Jump to content
IGNORED

It *cannot* just be about 1's and 0's - surely?


Mazza

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, gmgraves said:

It could be anything. I know what AQ says is in it; a 72v battery to "bias" the shield, but who knows? After all, as you point out, they pack a decent sounding USB DAC into a package that is about the same size as a "thumb drive" memory stick! It could easily have a circuit that acts to re-clock the digital volume by +2 dB, although I'd hate to think that they would do that. 

A device that intercepts and alters USB audio data while otherwise being completely invisible to the endpoints would not be difficult to create. Although I wouldn't put it past AQ to do that, I still think some other explanation is more likely.

Link to comment
27 minutes ago, gmgraves said:

Unlikely, but, then, even an unlikely explanation is better than none. USB 1.1 is fast enough to pass 96 KHz audio (IIRC), but if he were listening to 24/192 or DSD over USB1.1 (for some reason), I suspect that SOMETHING will happen!

Yes, USB 1.1 supports up to 96/24 stereo. If the source file has a higher resolution, something would have to downsample it, and that something could well introduce a slight attenuation.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...