Jump to content
IGNORED

Good Class D amps ??


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Kal Rubinson said:

Nope.  A switching power supply is not always correlated with Class D amplifier technology.  There are Class D power amps with linear power suppllies and there are Class A-B amps, like the Benchmark, with switching power supplies. 

 

 

My Class D uses a linear power supply.  Yet, it seems that many out there associate Class D with switching power supplies.

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment

What if we found out that if we finally achieved the theoretically perfect home system?   That the music and how it was recorded would not sound as good without some help from system coloration?

 

And, that our home system could never be a recreation of the actual event?  Our home system becomes its own event in its own right?  That we need to make our own event by how we put together our home audio system?

 

It can never sound like the actual event did. And, in theory, may end up sounding even better.  

 

I have witnessed to this myself by hearing playback of recordings of a live band I was in years ago.  The recording (in my opinion) made us sound better to listen to than being there.

 

So... we must discover what combinations of colorations suits us just fine. And, leave all the opinions of others walking down a path having no end. Find what you need to enjoy and have your own home system be truly our own.  Not a slave to trying to please the opinions of others who constantly wander seeking today's ideal that is not really the answer needed.   For, when does distortion become a none issue? 

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, crenca said:

 

Thanks.  A defensive of the artisan status quo, that an an advertisement for his company...

  You're obviously missing the point.  The one he was making in spite of the fact that he is world renown at what he does.

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
58 minutes ago, crenca said:

 

 

Nope, the point is made again and again and again.  Anyone who has been in audiophiledom more than a day already understands that measurements such as THD are correlated with good sound quality, but are not the exact measurement of SQ, that a bit of 2nd and 3rd order distortion (but not too much) is liked by many (most?) and is why tubes have stuck around, etc. etc.  The video is just more of the same.  

 

The real point of the video is to sell Dan's "world renown" art in coming up with just the right amount of "mystery" (his word) distortion so that the sound is "musical".  Same old same old.

 

Your a happy customer however 😋

  Do you enjoy your system?  Could it be better?  Have you already heard better? 

 

What are we looking for?  

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
On 1/21/2019 at 1:03 PM, crenca said:

 

I don't know about Dan, but yes Pass does investigate and "builds in" 2nd order distortion and the like because folks like it.  This "coloring" is known (if not well understood) and part of the Audiophile world.  Its relationship to fidelity is controversial.  GeneZ point is the common art and wine radical subjectivism with the strawmen "how does it sound", etc. and is the usual trope.

 

On topic, THD and the like are relevant, correlated to the sound, etc.  It's not the end of the story, but it is part of it...

Do you know how you sound?  How your response resonates?

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment

Well?   Where are we today with all the measurements?

 

Its helps. Yes..  But its not to become an idol to bow down to and worship as some seem to be doing. 

 

Has anyone in the past been enthralled with their audio system?   Or, are we seeking to be the first one?

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, crenca said:

 

The merits of measurement comparisons are exactly on topic in that they are related (if controversially) to what a "good" class D is.  The problem is that someone inevitably does not like measurements and how they question a purely art and wine evaluation (such as GeneZ).

  I like measurements.....  within reason.   I found things that were not being measured for to improve the sound.

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment

Things you apparently believe others like me imagine hearing when using.  Things you do not hear, so insist can not be real unless someone figures out how to measure them first... so, you then can know you have  an inability to hear certain things that others can and freely share about with others that also can .  :angel:

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, fas42 said:

A big problem is inertia - the audio business has fallen into a major pothole in its thinking, and only some are trying to get out, let alone even realise that they're trapped in this attitude dead-end.

 

 

Its the listeners that have fallen into inertia first.  When listeners are a happy people and vigorous even a little "sh_t box" playing music by a band having a genuinely good time sells stereos and recordings.   When it becomes a controlled and standardized industry the listeners will tend to become jaded and the thrill fades .  Creativity when its best is spontaneous and joyful ... not matter, even if its the blues.. When everything gets controlled and standardized a type of "smiley face" sadness takes over. 

 

Its all about the cultural values that ends up making a people unhappy.   Or, happy. The music/audio industry is simply a mirror,  not the cause.

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Ralf11 said:

 

list?

 

or examples?

   Do you know that some scientists believe that those who find true love can be measured?    Though, they have not found true love themselves?  How ironic life can be!

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, esldude said:

Life can be ironic. But this is no example. I can measure height without being tall. If love is measurable, there no reason it can't be measured by some one not in love.

  What science can only measure is sexual arousal and euphoria... by hormones present in the body.   But,  that's not love. That is why amplifier measurements are not enough to know which amp will sound the best.   Though measurements will be valid in showing which amps will sound bad.

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, fas42 said:

 

This should be the goal .. because it's what's on the recordings that is enthralling; flaws in the rig are the key elements that are in the way of achieving this experience - so, you have to work on improving things, in ways that are not easily measurable ...

 

Those with an 'objectivist' bent are obsessed with the concept that conventional measurements are good enough to tell the whole story. Because, the Important People have said so ... meantime, in the real world, lots of people have found this is hokum, by using various approaches to push the SOTA. The objectivists jump up and down in rage, insisting that people are using distortion to sweeten the sound - ummm, red herring, anyone?

 

A big problem is inertia - the audio business has fallen into a major pothole in its thinking, and only some are trying to get out, let alone even realise that they're trapped in this attitude dead-end.

The best sounding systems in my life were some of the worst sounding by today's standard.  What we see often times today in reviews is like telling a depressed person to have happy thoughts and the depression will go away.  A great sounding audio system is 90% how one feels to begin with. One of the symptoms of depression is the inability to enjoy normal things.  Can what is considered a great audio system make a depressed person to not be depressed?  Or,  simply be distracted for a moment in time?

 

If someone could make me feel 14 again?  I would have absolutely loved many of the systems I have owned. If it can be done for age 12?  Other styles of music would have been fully enjoyable.  

 

There is a mystery at work when it comes to music enjoyment. Its got to do with how we feel inside to begin with.  The music only finds a welcoming opening to fill. If that opening is not there?  It can be a 100,000 system, and be "meh."

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, jtwrace said:

I got into Class D when I built a pair of Hypex NC400's which replaced my 300wpc Class A Clayton Audio Mono blocks.  The madness ensued on AC.  Now I currently use the Hypex NC502MP as shown below.  

 

I have yet to hear a Hypex Class D amplifier.  I have heard an ICE amplifier (PS Audio S300) and its very good sounding.  I prefer my NuPrime ST-10. If I never heard the ST-10?  I believe I could be very happy with the S300.

 

Audience manufactures excellent speakers and cables, was looking at Hypex N core for their own amplifier.   As far as I know?  Its not being manufactured as of yet.  Audience is a highly respected - 'finicky -perfectionist' - audio company. 

Here is a video preview they gave with a prototype of their Hypex based amplifier.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9hWRyrroz8

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, kaka89 said:

I just got myself a ST-10 pairing up with Harbeth M30.1 and sounds very good.

Using RME ADI-2 DAC as preamp, directly connected to the power amplifier.

 

I just looked up the RME.  Interesting how it flies under the radar...

 

Here is a good review.  https://www.innerfidelity.com/content/rme-adi-2-dacheadphone-amplifier-review

 

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Ralf11 said:

I'd love to have you do a blind test of it vs. your Yggy... 

 

I do not do blind tests.  I live with a piece of equipment for several weeks to become accustomed to it. 

 

I will then try the other.  It should not be hard to hear a difference if there really is one.

 

If the differences are not obvious?  Or, just another flavor?  Then its not worth making any change.

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, kaka89 said:

 

I bought the RME because...

 

- I want to reduce the number of variables in my system, and RME is perfect because it objectively perfect

- I want EQ for room correction

- I want loudness control during low volume listening, RME implemented it perfectly

 

So now I only need to mix and match my amp and speaker.  

 

Yes..  Loudness control is essential for low level listening. 

 

I have gotten in trouble a few times when I mentioned it.  For my loudness control I chose to use a Barcus Berry BBE Sonic Maximizer.   The bottom end adjustment is dynamic EQ...  with a linear boost.  Its perfect for my desktop needs.  Mine was designed for desktop studio work with balanced connections.  WyWires makes great balanced cables.

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
Quote

Also not hard to hear a difference when there really isn't one using this methodology.  

 

In some cases, yes.  But not when its obvious.

 

You need to learn something....

 

https://www.zdnet.com/article/research-shows-musicians-have-better-hearing/

 

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28266-musicians-brains-fire-symmetrically-when-they-listen-to-music/

 

 

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

There are amps that designers add in even harmonics to produce a very nice "tube" effect on the sound. I have heard it.  It even sounds better than what I heard heard with tubes.  In essence, its the best of both worlds.

 

Because they do this?  The better sounding amp will not show as low distortion measurements.  Who wins? 

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, mocenigo said:

 

Well, FM Acoustics pre-amplifiers add a tad of 2nd harmonic to just the mids. Among the most transparent gear in the world, not the most neutral, very nice sound. 

 

 Roberto

  Ahh!  Another good company to be aware of. Thank you.

 

I just noticed that the Resolution Series 255-MKII uses the same type of potentiometer  as found in my passive preamp. 

https://image.jimcdn.com/app/cms/image/transf/none/path/sb99076bb5e16690c/image/ie536af55798bec26/version/1391575986/meticulous-attention-and-precision-in-every-detail-is-one-reason-for-unique-results.jpg

 

I gain the second harmonics with my NuPrime ST-10.  Very tube like in a very satisfying way, especially when its obviously sweet and detailed.

 

I also have a good tube preamp that sounds surprisingly almost identical with my passive.  Both use the same potentiometer. Very neutral tube preamp at that.

 

My passive preamp (when used in balanced mode) is the audiophile secret of the century.   I use only top notch balanced cables and sit back and laugh!  One balanced cable alone costs more than this unit!    Nob sound passive preamp

 

The NobSound will make your high-end system sound as good as the components you choose to implement. maybe I got an unusual piece?  Its so simple in its implementation.  Hefty metal casing.

 

I am now learning how power cords can greatly effect what is heard.

 

  :idea:

I may even place my tube preamp for sale in the near future and concentrate on finding the right power cords.  But, first.  I am going to test to see how different power cords will effect this nice triode preamp.

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Ralf11 said:

we need a good SET Class D amp with high bandwidth...

  

 

Could a tube possibly switch that fast with precision?  ...............    :scratch:

 

 

 

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, bluesman said:

 

The sound quality was absolutely superb - it was every bit the equal of my current Prima Luna except for a bit of flabbiness in the deep bass.  I'd hope and expect that a tube switching amp designed by a mind like Hegeman's would sound great.

 That may be something to keep an eye out for.   I wonder what the problems may be in implementing it and bringing it to the market, other than the notion that tubes are not as readily available as they once were,  and need to be replaced.  How could such speed be maintained and know when its time to replace a tube? (typical question that will be asked)

 

When I was in the Army Signal Corps we were trained on tube radios...  But, I figured that was because we were back in the early 70's.  hmmmm.. 

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment
54 minutes ago, esldude said:

At higher frequencies than that.

  What kind of tubes would be needed in a class D amp?    Are these for output?  KT88's?  What are we talking about?  🧐

It all depends upon in what dimension of life one finds themselves living in.  For, one man's music is another man's noise. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...