wgscott Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 I just read this: Music & Fractals | Stereophile.com (It is from 1990). I probably need to read it more carefully, but I think the assertion is that musical waveforms have an approximately self-similar property that isn't preserved with digital sampling. Whatdayathink of that? I'm skeptical, but it is an interesting idea... Link to comment
mansr Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Everybody was talking about fractals back then. A few years later they all stopped. Link to comment
mmerrill99 Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 All it seems to be saying is that digital audio does not display monotonicity whereas analog does. In digital audio the distortion increases as the level decreases. Link to comment
wgscott Posted December 14, 2016 Author Share Posted December 14, 2016 Everybody was talking about fractals back then. A few years later they all stopped. They still are. You just need to look at it in terms of a different time-scale. Link to comment
wgscott Posted December 14, 2016 Author Share Posted December 14, 2016 All it seems to be saying is that digital audio does not display monotonicity whereas analog does. In digital audio the distortion increases as the level decreases. Yeah, but you don't need to invoke some sort of self-similarity transformation. Anyway, it should be something that is computationally testable, at the very least. Link to comment
mansr Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 All it seems to be saying is that digital audio does not display monotonicity whereas analog does. In digital audio the distortion increases as the level decreases. And that is why we have 24-bit audio. Link to comment
mmerrill99 Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Yeah, but you don't need to invoke some sort of self-similarity transformation.Anyway, it should be something that is computationally testable, at the very least. Sure, fractals was just a sexy concept at the time of writing, shoehorned to fit Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Everybody was talking about fractals back then. A few years later they all stopped. Ha Ha! So true in so many fields - fractals turned out to be an interesting observation with limited predictive utility Link to comment
mansr Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Ha Ha! So true in so many fields - fractals turned out to be an interesting observation with limited predictive utility But they're so pretty! And you can keep zooming in on the Mandelbrot set for ever! Infinite precision. Take that, 24-bit. Link to comment
mrvco Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Fractals were replaced Fibonacci Numbers. -- My Audio System Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now