Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Simple Design Rendu Ethernet to S/PDIF Converter Review

    P1040190-thumb.pngHigh end audio can be a polarizing hobby. Audiophiles like to select a product or technology and support it vigorously as if they have a large financial interest in its success. I was born an audiophile. I completely understand the desire for one's selection to be validated by the audiophile community. I also completely understand how unhealthy that desire for validation is and the neurosis it can cause. Audiophiles, myself included, must realize the products we select today will sound just as good in five years regardless of competing products, newer technologies, and others' opinions. One polarizing topic in computer audio is digital interfaces. Two digital interfaces that have strong vocal support from users are USB and Ethernet. Users of one technology frequently turn a blind eye to the merits of the other technology and won't even consider its use. Many users selected one technology a few years ago based on the information available at that time and refuse to update their own knowledge for any number of reasons. This leads to armchair engineer arguments based on half truths and old information. These discussions are a disservice to all readers. Based on my experience with both USB and Ethernet interfaces it's clear to me that both can sound excellent and both will have a strong presence in high end audio for the foreseeable future. One Ethernet interface that caught my attention a couple months ago is the UPnP AV 2.0 / DLNA compliant Simple Design Rendu Ethernet to S/PDIF Converter. Admittedly I was drawn in by the features and specs, notably its ability to play DSD, 24/192 PCM, and gapless audio streamed over Ethernet. I've since listened through the Rendu for countless hours and put it through a number of network audio tests. At first the Rendu was a bit picky and had some playback issues. Today using the newest firmware I'm happy to report the Rendu works very well and continues to sound very good. The Simple Design Rendu Ethernet to S/PDIF Converter is a product to watch in both two channel and whole house network audio. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    P1040183-800px.jpg

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

     

    Simple Design Rendu Ethernet to S/PDIF Converter

     

    P1040218-thumb-mid.pngThe Simple Design Rendu is an Ethernet to S/PDIF all digital converter. The Rendu could be considered an audio appliance. It has one switch on the outside that turns the unit on/off and zero user configurable options. The Rendu is simple to understand. Ethernet in, S/PDIF out. Its only input is an Ethernet port that's connected to a home network via CAT5 or better cable. Its only output is a transformer coupled true 75 ohm BNC S/PDIF port that connects to a Digital to Analog Converter (DAC). Connecting to a DAC with an RCA S/PDIF port requires a very inexpensive BNC to RCA adapter. Simple Design can also supply a Cardas BNC to RCA cable. In addition to the Ethernet to S/PDIF model reviewed here Simple design offers an HDMI i2s model and a version with a built-in DAC among others.

     

    The Rendu features a low noise, low output impedance linear power supply. This power supply no doubt has roots in the extensive research Simple Design has done for its USB converters and Sonore music server PSUs. Critically important in converters such as the Rendu is the clocking scheme. Simple Design uses two fixed frequency low jitter clocks in the Rendu. This is frequently seen as one of the best, if not the best, way to lower jitter. One feature that may seem un-audiophile at first blush, but is very nice, is the integrated, 32 bit, high precision volume control. I really like this feature for controlling volume in independent zones. For example, when using several Rendu units and streaming the same or different audio to each unit it's possible to control the volume from an iPad / iPhone app such as JRemote. Using JRemote enables the user to not only control the volume of each zone independently but also from anywhere in one's house as long as the iDevice is on the network. During the review period I spent limited time with the volume control feature as my main use was two channel audio where my preamp remote was always available. In the next week or two I will publish a complete article on multi-zone audio using several Rendu units. In this upcoming article I will touch on the digital volume control of the Rendu.

     

    Careful selection of internal components by Simple Design enables the Rendu converter to stand out with a great set of features that work. Fans of Ethernet audio understand very well that UPnP / DLNA audio renderers often fail to meet the marketing hype from many manufacturers. The Rendu Ethernet to S/PDIF converter can do everything as advertised by Simple Design. This is a company that understands computer audiophiles and the Internet. Simple Design knows people will rant far more than they rave about a product. If the Rendu doesn't work as promised the company will never hear the end. A few of the Rendu's great features are DSD / DoP support for DSF and DFF files, 44.1 through 192 kHz support, AIFF, ALAC, WAV, and any FLAC compression level support, and (the mother of many heated internet rants) gapless audio support.

     

    The Rendu digital converter has some specific requirements in order to use its full potential. The Rendu hardware is ahead of most software applications with its DSD / DoP streaming capability. Readers looking to use the Rendu as a simpler PCM only converter without gapless support can likely use almost any UPnP / DLNA server / controller combination to feed audio to the unit. I have several DSD albums and live albums that require gapless playback for full effect. Thus I setup my system to meet the Rendu's requirements (at first). Then I strayed from the requirements and succeeded in producing a better user experience with my own configuration. According to Simple Design, "Gapless is currently supported via Android with Bubble UPNP as controller, J-River on PC and Mac as controller with local storage." In addition, "DSD/DoP pass thru requires the use of MinimServer." Once I verified the aforementioned configurations worked OK I moved to my preferred setup that I knew would also work. I used JRiver Media Center v18.0.175 as the server and an iPad with JRemote v2.31 as the control point. All my music is stored on a Synology DS1812+ NAS that isn't running any UPnP / DLNA software. JRiver's newest Media Center build features what it calls Bitstream DSD. This feature must be enabled deep within the Media Network settings for Media Center to stream DSD content as DoP to a compliant device. DoPE (DSD over PCM Ethernet) is supported by JRiver Media Center and MinimServer with the dopwav transcoder option. I used both during this review, but mainly JRiver because I like all its features, support forums, and using JRemote. The Simple Design Rendu supports gapless playback using SetNextAVTransportURI. There are other methods to accomplish gapless playback but I believe using SetNextAVTransportURI is the best method. JRiver Media Center sends a SetNextAVTransport call to the Rendu and identifies the upcoming track. It's then up to the Rendu to play the next track gapless. I put the Rendu through the ultimate torture test by attempting to play a gapless DSD album. Let's just say playback was a little less than great, but I believe JRiver Media Center had a hand in this subpar performance as well.

     

    Note: No question is a dumb question. Some readers have asked what is gapless playback. Gapless playback is simply playing the tracks on an album or in a queue without a time gap between tracks. When listening to The Dark Side of the Moon the tracks bleed into each other as do the tracks on most live albums. Without gapless support there is a pause of one or two seconds while the next track loads before playback continues. Gapless playback eliminates this time between tracks for smooth playback of all tracks just as the artist intended.

     

    P1040203-middle.png

     

     

     

    Testing Rendu's Features

     

    The Rendu not only had to sound good it had to work as advertised. Playback of 16 bit / 44.1 through 24 bit / 192 kHz material may seem like a standard feature that should work on every device, but that's not the case. Many UPnP / DLNA devices based on the Stream Unlimited Stream 700 board have a difficult time playing uncompressed FLAC files at 176.4 and 192 kHz. The Rendu doesn't use the Stream 700 board and doesn't have any problem playing 24/192 material bit perfect. The ability to play all relevant sample rates in whatever file format I use is a big deal. Devices that require transcoding one's entire library to a different format or compression level can tun off potential users and steer people from network based audio for no good reason. I connected the Rendu to my Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC for much of the testing as this DAC enables me to check for bit transparency. The sound quality of the Rendu was very good in my Berkeley / Spectral / TAD system. I really didn't know what to expect as I've never seen measurements for this device and I've only heard from Simple Design about the sound quality. Based on my extensive listening to the Rendu it's a terrific converter at all PCM sample rates.

     

    DSD over PCM Ethernet (DoPE) is a feature that intrigued me very much. At first I asked Simple Design why I would need this because the DoP devices I had used were all USB based and the Rendu was S/PDIF. Simple Design said DoP isn't interface specific and will work on S/PDIF, USB, and AES. Once I learned that major piece of information I was on a mission to find a DAC that supported DoP on its S/PDIF inputs. As luck would have it the dCS Vivaldi stack with DAC, Upsampler, and Clock arrived shortly thereafter. The Vivaldi DAC and Upsampler both support DSD DoP on all inputs. With the Vivaldi in place I could test the Rendu's DSD playback capability and sound quality. Much like it was with PCM the Rendu sounded very good with DSD material. My usual Nat King Cole album The Very Thought of You streamed via DoP from my computer to the Rendu then through the Vivaldi Upsampler was impressive. My only problem with DoPE playback was related to software. When selecting a DSD track playback started in JRiver MC but sound didn't come through the system for about 15-20 seconds. The tracks suffered a majorly delayed start, but weren't shortened in any way. MinimServer didn't produce this long of delay but my MinimServer library was vastly different as it resided on my Mac with five albums. Right now I consider MinimServer a testing tool because the JRiver interface with JRemote is so much better. However, for many people MinimServer is perfect because it is very low profile as it runs in the background and can be directed at a user's existing iTunes library. Perhaps if DoPE was of great importance to me and much of my collection was DSD encoded I would switch to MinimServer. I'm willing to bet JRiver will improve DoPE streaming in the coming weeks and months. The feature was only recently enabled. Without many test users for such a feature it's hard to get user feedback for improvement in a short period of time.

     

    Note: The EMM Labs DAC2X doesn't support DoP on S/PDIF or AES inputs yet. I've been told the Mytek Stereo 192 DAC and Benchmark DAC2 HGC support DoP on S/PDIF and AES inputs.

     

    Gapless playback over Ethernet has been the bane of many manufacturer's existence. Thus, I tested gapless playback extensively throughout the review period. The original version of Rendu firmware didn't support gapless playback. Simple Design furnished a firmware update, version 1.36.1.5, that enabled gapless playback at all sample rates. My music library contains gapless albums of all sample rates from 44.1 through 192 and even DSD. As noted earlier gapless DSD didn't work, but I don't hold that against Simple Design and the Rendu. I started with simple 44.1 albums such as The Dark Side of the Moon. Rendu didn't blink upon each track change. Playback was gapless or seamless from Dark Side track to track. I moved up to The Dark Side of the Moon at 24/96 ripped from the Blu-ray in the Immersion Box Set. My experience was identical to playing 44.1. The Rendu didn't blink and the sound was very good. After playing some gapless 24/176.4 material I moved to Stevie Ray Vaughan and Albert King at 24/192 kHz. The entire album start to finish played gapless through the Rendu. I also stopped and started a few tacks to simulate what a real user may do while listening. The Rendu / JRMC combo performed flawless. I thought I'd find issues with gapless as I moved up in sample rate. Fortunately there was no difference in gapless performance from 44.1 to 192. There was no way to identify the sample rate of the current album based on gapless performance. Either it's gapless or it's not and the Rendu is gapless at 192.

     

    Near the end of the review period I connected the Simple Design Rendu to the EMM Labs DAC2X's S/PDIF input and my CAPS Carbon server to the DAC2X's USB input. I wanted some reference with which to compare the sound quality through the Rendu. This comparison isn't the most real world comparison as most people with computers within 16 feet of their audio systems will simply select USB. The remaining users must user a longer distance technology like Ethernet. I don't see the Rendu as a competitor to products like the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha USB converter because the technologies are like apples and oranges. Users will likely require one or the other. During the comparison I was able to move directly from the USB to S/PDIF input and back with ease because the EMM Labs 2X remote has discrete input selection. I much prefer long term listening to compare components, but I did both short and long term for this review. Overall the Rendu holds its own very well versus the USB input of the DAC2X. Readers should consider that the 2X resamples all data to DSD rates as part of its jitter reduction scheme. I don't know if this equalizes the sound quality of the inputs a little bit or majorly. Music via the direct USB input was a bit tighter with a more solid image. When switching between inputs the first thing I noticed was the tightness of the images when using USB. I don't mean smaller image or soundstage rather the sound in the image just appeared tighter. The other noticeable sonic difference was a slight soft edge at the top and bottom frequencies through the Rendu. This softness was really minor. It's likely that many users wouldn't notice it unless presented with these two options for comparison and very familiar music. The Rendu was at a large disadvantage because the direct USB input is asynchronous and controls the clocking. Yet music played through the Rendu sounded very good. This is a terrific Ethernet to S/PDIF converter that works and sounds very good.

     

     

     

    Conclusion

     

    cash-logo-black-thumb.jpgThe Simple Design UPnP AV 2.0 / DLNA compliant Rendu Ethernet to S/PDIF Converter is a fairly unique device. Its features such as true gapless support from 44.1 through 192 kHz and DSD DoPE playback for streaming DSD over Ethernet help set the Rendu apart from the competition. Features are one thing but sound quality and a device that delivers on the manufacturer's promises is another. The Rendu sounded very good in all systems I used during the review. Both PCM and DSD playback was impressive through the Rendu. It's linear power supply likely plays a significant role in its sonic quality. The Rendu delivers on all its advertised features from DSD to 24/192 PCM playback to gapless audio all streamed over Ethernet. These features simply work as they should. The Simple Design Rendu Ethernet to S/PDIF Converter is a great solution for Ethernet based audiophiles, those tempted by Ethernet audio, and multi-zone music aficionados among others. Highly recommend and CASH Listed.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    Product Information:

     

     

     

    • Product - Sonore Rendu Ethernet to S/PDIF converter
    • Price - $1,369
    • Product Page - Link ex.png

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Jesus:

    Thanks for the PCB pic. Guess you'll have some stuffed production boards soon.

     

    What I was asking was if a Rendu can have both of your analog-out boards installed at the same time--the ESS-chip PCM DAC, and the new "PureDSD" board. So two pairs of RCA jacks at the back? (plus a pair of XLRs I guess since the DSD module has those too).

     

    You mention that the DSD converter board can also work with your USB input. You would seem to be referring to putting it in a different box, since the Rendu does not have a USB input. So are you offering the option to install the PureDSD module in your current Sonore USB converter box? That would make sense. (I don't imagine that you are planning to put it into any of the SoTM pieces or your Sonore/eXD DAC.)

     

    Have you set a price for a configuration of a box that is just USB>PureDSD (with internal PS please)? My preamp has plenty of inputs and my Mac has extra USB outputs. I could see switching input selection from my regular DAC to a dedicated DSD decoder for a proper taste of DSD (I assume that the board can do DSD128 and above).

     

    It turns out that commercial DAC chips which handle DSD (ESS, T.I., everybody), even though they bypass their regular sigma-delta sections and filters, they use a digital filter in the analog domain for DSD output, so they still have all the crazy FIR filter humps above the passband that you see on the DAC chip graphs! Knowing that now, I can see (hear) why DSD does not make people go wild--we are not hearing it in true form.

     

    Thanks and regards,

    Alex

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jesus:

    Thanks for the PCB pic. Guess you'll have some stuffed production boards soon.

    The boards have been produced and are on route to us now. There is still a lot of work to be done though and no eta.

     

    What I was asking was if a Rendu can have both of your analog-out boards installed at the same time--the ESS-chip PCM DAC, and the new "PureDSD" board. So two pairs of RCA jacks at the back? (plus a pair of XLRs I guess since the DSD module has those too).

    These are two different modules and if we combine things it will become very expensive. I'm just trying to give people some fun options...

     

    You mention that the DSD converter board can also work with your USB input. You would seem to be referring to putting it in a different box, since the Rendu does not have a USB input. So are you offering the option to install the PureDSD module in your current Sonore USB converter box? That would make sense. (I don't imagine that you are planning to put it into any of the SoTM pieces or your Sonore/eXD DAC.)

    The whole project is modular and we can swap USB for Ethernet and use any of the output modules we have produced. What changes is the rear face plate from design to design. The SOtM and Sonore/exD are unrelated projects.

     

    Have you set a price for a configuration of a box that is just USB>PureDSD (with internal PS please)? My preamp has plenty of inputs and my Mac has extra USB outputs. I could see switching input selection from my regular DAC to a dedicated DSD decoder for a proper taste of DSD (I assume that the board can do DSD128 and above).

    No info on the price. The max rate is based on the interface, but I'm not posting that just yet though:)

     

    It turns out that commercial DAC chips which handle DSD (ESS, T.I., everybody), even though they bypass their regular sigma-delta sections and filters, they use a digital filter in the analog domain for DSD output, so they still have all the crazy FIR filter humps above the passband that you see on the DAC chip graphs! Knowing that now, I can see (hear) why DSD does not make people go wild--we are not hearing it in true form.

    DSD into these DAC chips would not bypass the delta sigma modulator. It would bypass the PCM oversampling section.

     

    Thanks and regards,

    Alex

    Jesus R

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I assume you know how the Playlist mode of the Linn streamers work?

     

    With BubbleUPnP Server the software (can run on a NAS I believe I run it on my VortexBox) sits there and presents an OpenHome Media Renderer (the Linn extensions are basically the same) to the UPnP control point. In turn this allows you to create a playlist in Kinsky or LUMIN (or others). You can then close / disconnect the control point and the music remains playing because of the playlist on BubbleUPnPServer.

     

    This should get round the issues mentioned above of playback stopping when you use iOS apps (at least it did with my system).

     

    Eloise

     

    PS: Jesus; http://openhome.org/wiki/OhMedia may also be of interest to you. Open Home were developing a renderer (player) but it appears development has stalled.

     

    It's an interesting app and it was easy to configure. I was able to start a playlist with the Linn Kinskey iOS app, turn off my iPad and playback continued. The combination is not gapless with the Rendu though and the Lumin app does not find the proxy renderer created by the app.

     

    BTW Your not using the app on Vortexbox unless you installed it...

     

    Jesus R

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BTW Your not using the app on Vortexbox unless you installed it...

    Of course I installed it on the Vortexbox ... I just badly punctuated my sentance there...

    "[it|you] can run [bubbleServerUPnP] on a NAS I believe; I run it on my VortexBox"

    makes more sence but I probably typed it on my phone so I blame Apple!

     

    I wasn't sure if it would be gapless or not...

     

    Eloise

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Now that I've had the Sonore Rendu in my system for a while, I wanted to share my thoughts.

    But first, I want to thank Jesus for his incredible customer service. We must have sent a dozen emails back and forth, and he gave very complete answers to my many questions. It is such a rare opportunity these days to be able to interact with the designer/creator of something that you buy.

    So here is my setup:

    Western Digital WD Elements 1TB HDD connected via a USB 3.0 cable to a Belkin N300 wireless router.

    The router's firmware was replaced by tomatoUSB, which turns the router into a DLNA Music Server.

    Since the system has no access to the Internet, I created a private wireless network on the router.

    The music server (router) is controled via PlugPlayer on an iPad.

    The router connects to the Sonore Rendu via a generic CAT6 cable.

    The power cable for the Rendu is a Blank Sand Cable Violet Z1 MkII.

    The Rendu connects to a Chord QuteHD DAC via Audioquest VDM-5 BNC digital cable.

    The DAC connects to a Burson Soloist headphone amplifier via Audioquest King Cobra RCA analog cables.

    The power cable for the Soloist is a Blank Sand Cable Violet Z1 MkII.

    The Soloist connects to a pair of JH Audio JH16 Pro FreqPhase In Ear Monitors via a custom, solid OCC silver headphone cable.

     

    The sound quality of the Rendu is really striking. In my opinion, the ideal system makes me believe that I am there at the concert hall or recording studio.

    The Rendu brought my system much closer to this goal. Instuments sound more like they do when you hear them in person. In particular, the sound of cymbals was quite unrealistic when driven by my previous source (PC running JRiver). But on the Rendu, cymbals are startlingly realistic.

    The soundstage produced by the Rendu is both very precise and also very large. The soundstage extends way past my ears, which I didn't even know was possible with In Ear Monitors before. With my PC source, instruments tended to sound like they were on top of each other, but the Rendu gives all the instruments unique points of origin. The soundstage is also now very 3D.

    The resolution is also excellent. I love complex pieces, and with the Rendu, I am constantly amazed at how I now hear things in the background that I have never heard before.

    Dynamics are first rate. Bass is very tight and controlled, yet very deep. Voices sound incredibly realistic.

    Overall, I am extremely happy with the purchase and think that the Rendu is an incredible value.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    The sound quality of the Rendu is really striking. In my opinion, the ideal system makes me believe that I am there at the concert hall or recording studio.

    The Rendu brought my system much closer to this goal. Instuments sound more like they do when you hear them in person. In particular, the sound of cymbals was quite unrealistic when driven by my previous source (PC running JRiver). But on the Rendu, cymbals are startlingly realistic.

    The soundstage produced by the Rendu is both very precise and also very large. The soundstage extends way past my ears, which I didn't even know was possible with In Ear Monitors before. With my PC source, instruments tended to sound like they were on top of each other, but the Rendu gives all the instruments unique points of origin. The soundstage is also now very 3D.

    The resolution is also excellent. I love complex pieces, and with the Rendu, I am constantly amazed at how I now hear things in the background that I have never heard before.

    Dynamics are first rate. Bass is very tight and controlled, yet very deep. Voices sound incredibly realistic.

    Overall, I am extremely happy with the purchase and think that the Rendu is an incredible value.

     

    very nice feedback.

    I never expect that a change in transport from a pc to a renderer could yeild such improvement.

    One question, do you use only headphones or do you have a loundspeaker setup as well.

     

    Congrats!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I use my system only at work, so only headphones. I chose In Ear Monitors over open-ear headphones for the noise isolation. The JH16 FreqPhase IEMs are just phenomenal. CA wrote a great review. It surprises me that headphones get so little attention from audiophiles. One can get a top of the line headphone-only system for an order of magnitude less than a system that has to drive speakers. While headphones will never give one that visceral effect of bass hitting one's chest, headphones also completely bypass all of the terrible room interaction effects that plague systems with speakers. And I also feel that the resolution of the top of the line headphones is also better than just about any speaker.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, you should think of a music server or renderer the same way you think about CD transports. High-end CD transports cost many thousands of dollars and include custom power supplies among other things in order to limit noise and jitter. A PC has a very noisy switching mode power supply and was never designed for low jitter/noise. All the music software out there do their best to reduce the problem, but it can never be as good as hardware that was designed from the start to never introduce noise/jitter into the system in the first place. Music software tries to reduce the effects of the computer's operating system and all of the other processes. The Rendu is not a general purpose computer and so it has no operating system or competing processes. It only does one thing - play music. Having said all this, I was still surprised just how much of a difference the Rendu made. I highly recommend giving it an audition.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, you should think of a music server or renderer the same way you think about CD transports. High-end CD transports cost many thousands of dollars and include custom power supplies among other things in order to limit noise and jitter. A PC has a very noisy switching mode power supply and was never designed for low jitter/noise. All the music software out there do their best to reduce the problem, but it can never be as good as hardware that was designed from the start to never introduce noise/jitter into the system in the first place.

     

    Fully agree...

    X2! I keep saying this...better to eliminate the problem than to mitigate it..

     

    Music software tries to reduce the effects of the computer's operating system and all of the other processes. The Rendu is not a general purpose computer and so it has no operating system or competing processes. It only does one thing - play music. Having said all this, I was still surprised just how much of a difference the Rendu made. I highly recommend giving it an audition.

    Thanks for the detailed feedback....

    I hope to see the Rendu one day on this side of the atlantic with 220v version...who knows.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Extremely interesting product. I think more and more folks don't want computers near their audio systems.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It has been 3 months since the last post here but this thread is so informative I'll keep it going.

     

    I'm in the middle of evaluating some renderers using MinimServer installed on a Synology DS412+ and the Audionet iOS app for control. Unfortunately I cannot get access to a Rendu to make comparisons of sound quality so it would interesting if members who have such access could place the Rendu SQ in the context of the Krell Connect, Naim ND5 XS and Cyrus Stream X2 that I'm auditioning. In all cases I'm not using the on-board DACs but feeding the SPDIF output to my Bel Canto DAC 3.5 with VBS.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just received my Rendu. It arrived a bit sooner than Jesus promised, and he has been very helpful. I can't compare it to the devices you mention, but can compare it to 4 different asych USB input streams into a C50 pre-amp (Oppo 105, SOtM Miniserver, PC, SBT-EDO), and toslink and coaxial spdif via a SBT with EDO upgrade. I will report after comparisons.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've had a Rendu for a few weeks.

     

    I had been using a dedicated Mac mini with the usual "audiophile" tweaks--e.g. solid state hard drive, striped down OSX, after-market power cable and additionally, an iFi USB power supply (with the iGemini dual-headad USB cable and iPurifier, which all combined with the power supply was a definite improvement), and the usual player software including Amarra, Audirvana, Pure Music, etc.

     

    Still I felt something was definitely missing.

     

    Since I already had my iTunes library on a Sonology NAS and had read some good things about Sonore products (including this review by Chris) I thought I'd try the Rendu.

     

    My overall impression is similar to what was posted above by Koyie.

     

    Here's what I wrote back to Adrian at Sonore about the Rendu:

     

    "Adrian-

     

    I was right! And you were right as well!

     

    I said that my computer was the weak link in my system. And you said the Rendu was "crazy good".

     

    I managed to get Java and then MinimServer installed on my Synology NAS without even having to get my computer guy's help (thanks to a tutorial on the MinimServer forum on how to install Java). Then I got PlugPlayer. Then I started listening.

     

    Wow! I can't believe the difference the Rendu makes over my dedicated/tweaked Mac mini (even using programs like Amarra and Audirvana). I had been questioning everything about my system and room, thinking something wasn't right. The sound I had been getting -- while technically good, pristine, etc -- never was right. It always sounded a bit mechanical, flat, artificial, lifeless and ultimately uninvolving. I even bought a Benchmark DAC2 to try in place of my Berkeley Alpha DAC, thinking the Berkeley was just too soft and subdued. The Benchmark has got a bit more bite and is more up-front, but still the sound wasn't right. I tried other speakers and cables I have here at home. Tried tube swapping in my preamp. Nothing made the sound like I knew it should be.

     

    With the Rendu, there is so much more of everything. Immediacy, depth, great leading edge but more body at the same time. The percussive sound of instruments is now so lifelike. Music is so satisfying now. You said I would be amazed how good my Berkeley DAC would sound being fed by the Rendu. Boy were you right! This DAC is incredible. It just didn't have the highest possible source feeding it.

     

    Thanks to you (and Jesus) for making such a great product!"

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I also want to comment on the Rendu. It sounds to me better than the other input means I use (usb into an oppo, usb via SOtM miniserver into my dac in my preamp, SBT coax in, and others). One reason I am preferring it over usb (since it sounds as good or better), is that usb is a bit fussy about power up/off among components and requires rebooting sometimes, whereas the Rendu is bulletproof, and just always works. Finally, Jesus has to be in the upper reaches of the 'nice and helpful to deal with' category.

    Best,

    Mark

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's an interesting app and it was easy to configure. I was able to start a playlist with the Linn Kinskey iOS app, turn off my iPad and playback continued. The combination is not gapless with the Rendu though and the Lumin app does not find the proxy renderer created by the app.

     

    Is there any news on gapless playback support with the Rendu from BubbleUPnP Server OpenHome enabled playlists?

     

    I have both MinimServer and BubbleUPnP Server running on Synology DS713+ and I'm a long time fan of BubbleUPnP Android application.

    I'm seriously contemplating the idea of purchasing a Rendu therefore I'd be interested to hear about this.

     

    Thanks!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is there any news on gapless playback support with the Rendu from BubbleUPnP Server OpenHome enabled playlists?

    I don't use the Rendu ... but this certainly works (gapless playlist) now with other UPnP streamers which support gapless.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...