Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Devialet Unleashes Phantom

    thumb.png

    1-Pixel.png

    One week ago Devialet contacted me about returning to Paris to see a new product before it was released to the public. I was provided no additional information. I wasn’t sure if I was going to see a loudspeaker, a DAC, or an iPhone replacement. I said yes immediately because Devialet doesn’t build run-of-the-mill products. The company’s products so far have been fantastic and like nothing else on the market. Thus, My flight was booked and my high expectations were set.

     

    I arrived in Paris on a cold, windy, and rainy day. Due to the time change and eight hour flight I didn’t schedule anything for the day of my arrival. However, I received a hint about the new product from an industry friend still awake in the Pacific US time zone. This friend didn’t know what the product would be, but he had been following a Twitter account named PhantomRising. This account, shrouded in mystery, wasn’t directly linked to Devialet, but both Devialet and this PhantomRising account said there would be a revolutionary announcement December 16, 2014. The hint I received from my friend via the PhantomRising Twitter account said, “RIP CHAINES HIFI, DOCKS, ENCEINTES, HOME CINEMA…” I had an entire day to chew on that information before my scheduled visit to Devialet at 9:00AM the next morning.

     

    The following morning I put in my JH Audio JH16 earphones and turned up Leonard Cohen’s new album Popular Problems via Tidal HiFi as I walked the streets of Paris. I met Quentin Bernard at 9 o’clock sharp outside Devialet headquarters in Paris’ 2nd arrondissement. Quentin didn’t waste any time before leading me to a special conference room cloaked in secrecy. Inside this room were several roundish objects covered by black Devialet microfibre cloths and a single MacBook Air laptop. In my head I was thinking about the previous RIP message and I still couldn’t put the pieces together to figure out exactly what might be under those cloths.

     

    Quentin pulled the cloths off each item to reveal the new Devialet Phantom. Phantom is what Devialet calls a Sound Center. The unit receives music via Optical, WiFi, or Ethernet (PLC Homeplug AV2) and outputs it with 750 watts (Phantom) or 3,000 watts (Silver Phantom) of power. Phantom is design to be used as a single unit, a stereo pair of units, a multi-channel mix of units, or even up to 24 units running in what is called Club Mode. Phantom is a true all-in-one solution that enables the user to bring their own source of music for playback. Quentin gave me a little information about Phantom before asking me to take a seat to have a listen. The sound of Phantom was absolutely terrific. It’s hard to believe these units go down to 16 Hz. After hearing a couple demo tracks I streamed a little Leonard Cohen via Qobuz though a pair of Phantoms. Leonard’s deep baritone vocal sounded as if it was emanating from a large ported loudspeaker and the soft background violin contrasted beautifully. It was hard to believe Phantom’s a sealed enclosure could produce what I was hearing.

     

    Along with Phantom, Devialet has created a new iOS and Android application called Spark to control playback of local music and streaming services like Qobuz, Deezer, and in the not-to-distant future Tidal HiFi. Equally as impressive as Phantom was the demonstration of Spark. The application works exactly how users think about music playback rather than forcing the user to play music based on an antiquated GUI. Spark’s playback queue is so fast and impressive I can’t do it justice via a limited number of words. Dragging and dropping tracks and albums and playlists via iPad and watching them same queue on an optional computer instantly mirror the iPad was extremely impressive. I know what it takes to develop applications and I can guarantee the Devialet team is seriously talented.

     

    There is so much more to say about Phantom because it’s an entirely new product with 77 patented inventions inside. The multitude of uses is endless. For now I will include a couple PDFs with more information for readers and hope to follow up with a full review of Phantom in due time.

     

     

    Press Release [LINK] (45 MB PDF)

     

    White Paper [LINK] (3 MB PDF)

     

    Devialet Site [LINK]

     

     

     

     

    [video=youtube_share;N24vaTER10k]

     

     

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15923[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15920[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15917[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15924[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15921[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15918[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15925[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15922[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15919[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15926[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15934[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15931[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15928[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15932[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15929[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15933[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15930[/ATTACH]




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Devialet paid for my plane ticket, hotel, and lunch after the demonstration. Without this I wouldn't / couldn't make the trip to report on the Phantom to the CA Community.

     

    That's what I assumed, but I thought it should be disclosed upfront by you or anyone else who submits an article or review. I appreciate the direct reply. As I continue to refine and improve my setup I appreciate the great resource that CA is! Thanks.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Could someone explain how it is possible to get low bass that they are claming with such a small woofer inside a very small cabinet? I thought it takes a lot of mass to move a substantial amount of air to deliver deep, powerful bass! Inquiring mind wants to Know?

     

    I don't think it needs mass, the speaker is just a type of piston displacing volume (rather quickly).

    Force = mass x acceleration

     

    the mass in the equation above is the effective mass of the air being displaced, the acceleration relates to how quickly it's being displaced.

    the design relies on a huge amount of displacement at lower frequencies, so the peak accelerations are going to be very much higher than a traditional (larger) bass driver to get the same SPLs. therefore the required force acting on each driver is going to be very high too.

     

    to achieve that you need lots of transducer wire, lots of magnet power, lots of current (all of them). So it's not mass you need per se, just loads of amps, the driver coils to handle it and driver/cone structure that doesn't disintegrate under the high loads.

    Essentially I think it's just compensating for the much smaller cone by using a much bigger displacement so as to move the same volume of air.

     

    the high displacements also explain why contra-acting driver makes sense, else at 20hz a single-sided design would be wobbling (or rolling?) it's way across the living room.....

     

    does that make sense or am I talking rubbish ?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think it needs mass, the speaker is just a type of piston displacing volume (rather quickly).

    Force = mass x acceleration

     

    the mass in the equation above is the effective mass of the air being displaced, the acceleration relates to how quickly it's being displaced.

    the design relies on a huge amount of displacement at lower frequencies, so the peak accelerations are going to be very much higher than a traditional (larger) bass driver to get the same SPLs. therefore the required force acting on each driver is going to be very high too.

     

    to achieve that you need lots of transducer wire, lots of magnet power, lots of current (all of them). So it's not mass you need per se, just loads of amps, the driver coils to handle it and driver/cone structure that doesn't disintegrate under the high loads.

    Essentially I think it's just compensating for the much smaller cone by using a much bigger displacement so as to move the same volume of air.

     

    the high displacements also explain why contra-acting driver makes sense, else at 20hz a single-sided design would be wobbling (or rolling?) it's way across the living room.....

     

    does that make sense or am I talking rubbish ?

     

    Sure, or more simply: A bass driver needs to move a lot of air. It can do that either by being large in cross-sectional area, or if not (as in the case of the Phantom), by having a large excursion, i.e., back-and-forth movement.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The industrial design of these is surreal, disturbing and awesome all at the same time... :)

     

    First Naim comes out with Muso (also really cool), and now this. Where does this new all-in-one trend now come from?

     

    I hope both win some entirely new people to high quality audio!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Devialet paid for my plane ticket, hotel, and lunch after the demonstration. Without this I wouldn't / couldn't make the trip to report on the Phantom to the CA Community.

     

    For the sake of (seemingly) independent journalism, it is absolutely critical that it be disclosed when a junket is made and the products reported on. I find it surprising that you didn't declare this initially in the article you wrote.

     

    Be careful that you don't become a shill for too many manufacturers, or the loss of respect as an independent voice will soon follow.

     

    As someone who has written product reviews for publications in the past (not audio), I can speak from a similar perspective, and feel it is imperative that a certain distance be maintained. Everyone has their own level of comfort with this, and I'm not saying that anything was done wrong at all. Just be thoughtful.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sure, or more simply: A bass driver needs to move a lot of air. It can do that either by being large in cross-sectional area, or if not (as in the case of the Phantom), by having a large excursion, i.e., back-and-forth movement.

     

    I would expect this to result in a significant amount of bass bloat due the the time it takes for the drivers to move that far. It will be interesting to hear these at a show and see how they sound.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Didn't Bose do this already (small drivers, mucho equalization) in 1968?

     

    No free lunch, guys!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would expect this to result in a significant amount of bass bloat due the the time it takes for the drivers to move that far. It will be interesting to hear these at a show and see how they sound.

     

    The drivers would have to move in time with the frequency/ies they reproduce, so that's not going to change from a larger driver.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The industrial design of these is surreal, disturbing and awesome all at the same time... :)

     

    First Naim comes out with Muso (also really cool), and now this. Where does this new all-in-one trend now come from?

     

    I hope both win some entirely new people to high quality audio!

     

    Though at ~$2000 and ~$2500 US each, I don't see these scattered around folks' homes unless they have quite a bit of spare cash.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, could you comments on the Phantom set-up you heard? Did you listen to one or two Phantoms? Were they on stands or the floor? You state you were seated....just trying to visualize how they were configured. Thanks.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, can you describe the set up you auditioned? Was it two Phantoms in a typical stereo configuration? Were they on stands? Etc. Thanks.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For the sake of (seemingly) independent journalism, it is absolutely critical that it be disclosed when a junket is made and the products reported on. I find it surprising that you didn't declare this initially in the article you wrote.

     

    Be careful that you don't become a shill for too many manufacturers, or the loss of respect as an independent voice will soon follow.

     

    As someone who has written product reviews for publications in the past (not audio), I can speak from a similar perspective, and feel it is imperative that a certain distance be maintained. Everyone has their own level of comfort with this, and I'm not saying that anything was done wrong at all. Just be thoughtful.

     

    Well, you have cahones...we all bow to the moral arbiter.

    Here is a guy that has provided an incredible website on his own steam, created a site read world wide and filled with very useful information to an uncountable number of people but we all waiting by the phone in case you have a nascent objection to his integrity. WOW

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, your site is still messed up regarding number of posts shown when logged in vs. logged out. The counter at the top of the page for this article always shows 23 comments. The home page lists 37 comments. When logged out and on the article page 37 comments are visible. When logged in only 26 comments are visible. This makes it impossible to respond to the missing comments especially if you want to quote what someone else has written.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Very exciting and to my eyes it looks great.

     

    It seems Devialet are aiming the product at the Linn, Naim, Cyrus end of the market rather than Bose and Co. If the sound quality lives up to the hype expect retail turbulence and a frenzied change of R&D direction from the competition.

     

    Me - I think I want 2

     

    Tog

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, you have cahones...we all bow to the moral arbiter.

    Here is a guy that has provided an incredible website on his own steam, created a site read world wide and filled with very useful information to an uncountable number of people but we all waiting by the phone in case you have a nascent objection to his integrity. WOW

     

    I think your comment is out of line. When someone writes about a product, especially when they are given an exclusive, readers should be told under what conditions the trip was made. It doesn't matter that Chris started his own website. It's now a large influential site in its field. Readers don't have a personal relationship with Chris, so they should be made aware under what conditions such an article is being written. Otherwise they don't have a proper framework for evaluating the article.

     

    Disclosure of such info only increases the readership's confidence in Chris; absence of disclosure will only promote cynicism and speculation about possible lack of objectivity on Chris' part.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Didn't Bose do this already (small drivers, mucho equalization) in 1968?

     

    No free lunch, guys!

     

    uh, no. basically none of the technology Devialet is using existed back then. Have you read the white paper linked to in the article?

    Get a bit of knowledge about the technology before dissing and dismissing it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, what was the set up you listened to? Two Phantoms sitting on stands ala a normal 2 channel set up? One Phantom on a conference table? I read that you were seated when listening.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    uh, no. basically none of the technology Devialet is using existed back then. Have you read the white paper linked to in the article?

    Get a bit of knowledge about the technology before dissing and dismissing it.

     

    White Papers don't move air.

     

    And linear, clean, low bass requires air to move.

     

    Physics.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    White Papers don't move air.

     

    And linear, clean, low bass requires air to move.

     

    Physics.

     

    These are nothing like the Bose. Bose moved air with multiple close-set smaller drivers. Devialet does it with long driver excursion, controlling the distortion that might otherwise result with very powerful amplification and sophisticated DSP.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, what was the set up you listened to? Two Phantoms sitting on stands ala a normal 2 channel set up? One Phantom on a conference table? I read that you were seated when listening.

    Two Phantoms on a table. I was both seated and standing.

     

    You should see the stands for the Phantom. They are awesome and perform heat dissipation as well. I can't wait to hear these on stands. The table setup was just for ease of demo even though we all acknowledged it was less than perfect for sound quality. Plus, Devialet wanted to demonstrate how good the speakers could sound sitting on a table.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, your site is still messed up regarding number of posts shown when logged in vs. logged out. The counter at the top of the page for this article always shows 23 comments. The home page lists 37 comments. When logged out and on the article page 37 comments are visible. When logged in only 26 comments are visible. This makes it impossible to respond to the missing comments especially if you want to quote what someone else has written.

     

    I think they replies to reviews need to be approved and thus why the numbers differ temporarily.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, you have cahones...we all bow to the moral arbiter.

    Here is a guy that has provided an incredible website on his own steam, created a site read world wide and filled with very useful information to an uncountable number of people but we all waiting by the phone in case you have a nascent objection to his integrity. WOW

     

     

    Yes, I absolutely do, because I have been in his shoes and am aware of the responsibility that publishing articles of this nature require to maintain editorial integrity.

     

    Your reading comprehension may be lacking because of the inclination to skim through fora postings, so you may not have noted that I state that I did not say that anything improper has been done...

     

    The internet is awash with sites that appear to have independence from the manufacturers, but simple observations prove that many are doing nothing more than reprocessing press releases. It has gotten so bad that it is showing up in printed magazines now, including well known audio industry magazines, in thinly veiled articles.

     

    I'm suggesting that Chris has a much better reputation than that, and he should act to ensure he maintains it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think they replies to reviews need to be approved and thus why the numbers differ temporarily.

    It's actually a cache issue behind the scenes. Once in a while I need to clear the cache to get the number of posts to match.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Could someone explain how it is possible to get low bass that they are claming with such a small woofer inside a very small cabinet? I thought it takes a lot of mass to move a substantial amount of air to deliver deep, powerful bass! Inquiring mind wants to Know?

     

    When we talk about bass from our standard loudspeakers being omnidirectional, it may be so to some approximation and at some distance, but a normal bass driver in a box isn't a true monopole, which is a pulsating sphere.

     

    The moment I saw the Phantom, the bass drivers and their constellation reminded me much more of a true monopole. And I suspect that this contributes to the efficiency.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well these look very interesting. If they are truly flat from 20-20k ±0.5dB that seems like exceptionally good performance for a speaker that size. Even more-so if they can truly extend to 16-25k ±2dB.

    I am especially interested in this because it is a sealed design. I have always preferred sealed speakers to ported ones, though that typically means your low frequency extension is rather limited.

     

    It really has felt that the traditional large passive speaker design has been on the way out, and this seems like the way forward for speaker design.

    I have been looking at higher-end "bookshelf" size speakers for a while now, and these have jumped straight to the top of my list.

     

    While it my be $5000 for a stereo pair, that should put it in a similar price-point to the Genelec 8351A, which was also near the top of that list - but it's ported, only extends down to 38Hz, and would need to be paired with a subwoofer.

     

     

    I do have some concerns though, and have always been wary about buying into the first generation of unconventionally-designed products like this.

     

    My first concern would be: how do you actually send music to them? Do they just use DLNA, or do I have to use some Devialet-specific app? I really don't want to buy into a proprietary system.

    What about multi-channel audio? With optical you are limited to stereo signals, you need HDMI for uncompressed multichannel audio.

     

    The bigger question I have though, is: what about room correction?

    It doesn't matter if your speaker is perfectly flat 20-20k once you place it in a non-ideal room.

    With all the DSP in there, and each driver having its own amplifier, I would hope that it has a good room correction system, because it could really limit its performance if you have to perform DSP externally and treat it as a stereo speaker rather than correcting each driver individually.

    The built-in room correction is really what had put the Genelec 8351A at the top of my list until now.

     

    And if I'm nitpicking, I actually think that the white unit looks better than the silver, but I would rather pay for the higher performance model.

     

     

    For anyone that wants to see what it looks like actually playing music, I found this video:

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...