steveww Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 I use a silent Linux PC running MPD as my source. Currently I have a VA Labs TerraLink doing USB -> SPDIF duties. I hear all the fuss about async USB on the forums and I would like to give it a try so I am thinking about getting the MF V-Link II. Of course the MF website does not mention Linux so has anyone out there tried it, does it work and what hacks (if any) did you need to do? Regards,[br]Steve W[br]http://www.steveww.org/[br]Linux MPD (silent PC) -> MF V-Link II -> Benchmark HDR -> Hypex UcD400 x 2 (mono) -> Heybrook Sextet Link to comment
firedog Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 No official support from MF. The V-link I apparently does work with some Linux installations, based on various repoprts. The V2 probably does also, at least up to 24/96. I suggest you write MF and ask them under what circumstances it should work with Linux (alsa version, kernel version etc). Or as a MF dealer for a loaner or a demonstration. Main listening (small home office): Main setup: Surge protectors +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Protection>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three BXT (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments. Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three BXT Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup. Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. All absolute statements about audio are false Link to comment
nyc_paramedic Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 ask them if the dac is usb audio class 1 or 2 compliant. if yes, should work fine with linux. if they tell you that you have to download one of their drivers for windows then it's probably not going to work with linux. and looking at the manual on their website: ... The computer drivers for the USB input of the V-LINKII should install automatically. To check correct installation follow these steps: Temperature 5 to 45 degrees Celsius Humidity 10 to 90% non condensing There are no user adjustments inside. Please refer all service work to an authorised Musical Fidelity agent. Front and back connections Power LED (Blue) USB input Lock LED (Green) PC /Windows users Check the computer has picked up the device and is currently using it by clicking: (most Windows versions) - Start - Settings - Control panel - Sounds and Multimedia - Audio Check “Musical Fidelity VLINK” appears under PREFERRED AUDIO DEVICE tab Mac users Check the computer has picked up the device and is currently using it by clicking: (MAC OS X) - System preferences - Hardware - Sound Check that “Musical Fidelity VLINK” is selected under the OUTPUT tab. If the computer’s warning sounds/chimes are to played through the DAC, make sure it is selected under the SOUND EFFECTS tab too. looks like it uses the standar usb audio class 1 driver of the native os. Link to comment
falcongate Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 My original V-link works fine with my Alix/Voyage MPD machine, all the way to 24/96. Link to comment
dummy Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 I am a bit confused here... (don't worry I am often confused!) Are you saying that any DAC that need a driver for Windows won't work with Linux? I thought Windows always needed drivers beyond 96kHz since It isn't USB Audio Class 2.0 compliant unlike OSX and Linux (or so I thought). Can you clear that up for me please? Thanks! Arcam rDAC / Oppo BDP-83 / NAD 315BEE / Totem Arro Link to comment
nyc_paramedic Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 Not necessarily. If the DAC is only 24/96 *and* the DAC maker says no special drivers are needed it's most likey UAC1 compliant and will work with Windows, Mac and Linux out of the box. If the DAC decodes 24/192 it will need a special driver for Windows but not necessarily Mac or Linux. Reason is, Windows does not have a built in UAC2 driver, last I checked. And last I checked was looong ago as I don't use Windows. If the DAc decodes 24/192 and runs out of the box in Mac, it should be UAC2 compliant and work with Linux that has a recent kernel and ALSA 1.0.24, which most have. Link to comment
dummy Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 I will start another thread at some point to really understand Linux and all its subtilities... Arcam rDAC / Oppo BDP-83 / NAD 315BEE / Totem Arro Link to comment
nyc_paramedic Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 Ok. But just remember: Linux is not an OS. It's just a kernel. But that's a whole other ball of wax... Link to comment
dummy Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 That's why I will start another thread, not to hijack this one, since I thought I knew what It was but the more I read about It, the more confuse I get... Arcam rDAC / Oppo BDP-83 / NAD 315BEE / Totem Arro Link to comment
Paul R Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 I have no trouble using a V-Link or a Halide Bridge under relatively new versions of Linux. On most of them you do have to go and use alsamixer or aplay to unmute the interface and/or turn up the volume. That's not difficult, but it can be confusing. -Paul Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
steveww Posted November 15, 2011 Author Share Posted November 15, 2011 New V-Link II has arrived and been plugged in to my Linux MPD. Worked first time :-) The V-Link II only supports S24_3LE (24 bit) data format so you have to use plughw:1,0 for the device as ALSA needs to convert my CD rips (16 bit) to 24 bit. I spent some time comparing the V-Link II to my existing Teralink X both connected via Toslink to Benchmark HDR. The difference is very slight but could be spotted in a blind A-B test. The V-Link is a tad smoother, the music is more liquid, slightly less grain or glare. The difference though is very slight it is not a night and day change. I am happy with this new device and it will be staying in the current configuration. Regards,[br]Steve W[br]http://www.steveww.org/[br]Linux MPD (silent PC) -> MF V-Link II -> Benchmark HDR -> Hypex UcD400 x 2 (mono) -> Heybrook Sextet Link to comment
nyc_paramedic Posted November 15, 2011 Share Posted November 15, 2011 MPD had had S24_3LE support for a while. No need to use plughw; hw should be just fine. Link to comment
steveww Posted November 15, 2011 Author Share Posted November 15, 2011 I am running Ubuntu Server 10.04 LTS which ships with 0.15.4 which predates support for S24_3LE. This came in with 0.16. As all my music is 16:44100 CD rips I am trying to decide if it is worth updating? Regards,[br]Steve W[br]http://www.steveww.org/[br]Linux MPD (silent PC) -> MF V-Link II -> Benchmark HDR -> Hypex UcD400 x 2 (mono) -> Heybrook Sextet Link to comment
nyc_paramedic Posted November 15, 2011 Share Posted November 15, 2011 If you value the stability you have now with your Uubuntu then probably no. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now