Popular Post Superdad Posted March 1, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2020 The main issue--and the reason for much of the "objectivist"/"subjectivist" divide--may be that the traditional measurements being taken are not looking at or showing up many of the variances in gear that people readily hear. Much as specialized tests and advanced imaging and genetic testing is required to identify certain diseases which will not be found in routine blood lab work, there are measurements and research to be done which go beyond what an Audio Precision rig or high-speed scope will see. I need not recite to you the history of analog and digital measurement advances which revealed factors (e.g. TIM and jitter) that were for a long time not even considered. There is little reason to believe that current popular measurement regimens are telling us all there is to know about audible differences. PYP, Allan F, Sonic77 and 3 others 5 1 UpTone Audio LLC Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now