Iving Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Hope I'm On Topic enough 🙂 1. I don't stream. The main reasons are because: (i) I dislike commercial environments associated with my personal listening (aside from the obvious financial implications of acquiring media inc. CDs and the equipment necessary to reproduce music); (ii) I dislike a distracting visual environment associated with listening - I use fb2k in black and white mode - simple - nothing but info germane and how I want to organise my flac Library and play back the music - I don't want (especially wrong for a given rip) Album Art and I don't like database typo mistakes or other errors - my Library is tagged my way - it's not just control freakery - the way I do it I can exploit and thus enjoy my music resource far more effectively - I can "study" the evolution of music more efficiently; and, (iii) I don't need to pay for music because I have enough already and there's little draw for me personally in "new" music - my interests are mostly pre-1980 with few exceptions. 2. CDs are an important resource for me. I rip using EAC [Exact Audio Copy] and always have done. Incidentally my system is Dante/RedNet. *All* my digital music is ripped/redbook and I upsample x 4 in fb2k before ASIO/DVSC. 3. I do value CDs as an archive. I get pleasure out of owning them. I go thru a lot of new Jewel Cases etc. Whereas my non-classical archive is A-Z by Artist my classical archive is sorted in other ways - not by Label as it happens but by Composer, Conductor etc - logical enough to my thinking. 4. Here comes the interesting point which I know may invite contradiction - I see CDs as an asset. I'm not dogmatic about it - and I know the world and his wife are streaming - but what if the streamers start charging too much for what we want - or mess up the masters - or just want to monopolise commercially etc - well I have my own resource at home and they can't touch it. 5. Some CDs or CD sets are valuable/collectable. I know as a fact because I am an online trader. 6. A two-edged sword (see my new Topic here: https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/58521-one-mans-jewels-another-mans-junk-or-load/) but I see CDs as a possible resource for my family. I know my nieces are interested in records. Maybe some of the next generation (or two) will want CDs. Maybe I turn out to be wrong about that, and in the end most CDs become deserving only of shredding. 7. In relation to the previous few bullets, I recall our mutual friend Bob was on the same page about this - rb2013 here and elsewhere but for present purposes Tubelover2 on USA Audio Mart - I remember he posted about CDs retaining their usefulness/worth - I could maybe find the thread area if interest. Thanks for the Topic Paul. Teresa 1 Link to comment
Popular Post Iving Posted February 24, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 24, 2020 P.S. You know that saying about history repeating itself. Well CDs came out (1980s/90s) and new releases were issued in small quantities on vinyl - now worth a fortune. We have a resurgence of vinyl (even if digits on vinyl is plain stupid and a nasty con on the young) as we speak. What I really wanted to say was about 78s - it was the same thing in a way. Have you seen that wonderful, wonderful documentary about Joe Bussard. He used to tout for 78s in the Deep South and elsewhere that folks were just dumping - all that amazing rare Blues stuff - some of it priceless as no master tapes - oh please watch if you haven't seen it - "Desperate Man Blues". Don Blas De Lezo, Teresa and mourip 1 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now