asdf1000 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 On 8/13/2018 at 6:20 AM, Miska said: And much lower CPU overhead for high channel counts at hires sampling rates combined with lot latency. PCIe/Thunderbolt can do nice busmaster DMA "zero-copy" straight from application to audio interface without involving things like USB packet handling. Is the Thunderbolt interface easier to isolate noise from a powerful computer, than USB? Ground noise, power line noise etc? The common things discussed/tackled with isolating USB inputs of DACs? So even though it has lower latency and better support for high channel counts at high sample rates, does Thunderbolt still face those same electrical noise isolation challenges as USB? Link to comment
asdf1000 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 6 minutes ago, jabbr said: Using the Corning optical cable, perhaps I imagine so. My Corning Optical USB works really well. Here's a post by Ted Smith (who also uses it): https://forum.psaudio.com/t/corning-usb-optical-cable/3761/44 7 minutes ago, jabbr said: It may not but USB seems so very sensitive to cables so who knows. Hehe noted, I was asking here if Thunderbolt is as sensitive, in the hope that somebody knows ? @Miska @PeterSt Link to comment
asdf1000 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 28 minutes ago, jabbr said: Peter is already preparing the Luscious as well as the Luscious^2 which has a double shield over the fiberoptic cable ... Lol for real? Link to comment
asdf1000 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, Ralf11 said: at $275 for the cable, that is less than many, many isolation techniques Well that's what Ted himself says in the post... Many have had reliability issues with it though. Luckily not me though (yet). Link to comment
asdf1000 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 3 minutes ago, jabbr said: Stranger things have happened than a doubly shielded fiberoptic cable ( SPF 1,000,000? ) but I'll let Peter speak for himself -- don't want to pre-announce anything ? Ha, you're making fun of him for jumping on the JSSG 360 bandwagon with Lush^2. For others, the Corning is not a 100% fiber optic cable though. It has very thin power and ground lines but Ted explains above. look&listen 1 Link to comment
asdf1000 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, jabbr said: One thought at the time (I have one also) is that the resistance along the long and thin ground line, reduced ground flow and hence noise. That's what Ted Smith explains in the post I linked above.. Sounds fantastic in my system, from a 5Vdc LattePanda running HQP NAA at DSD512. jabbr 1 Link to comment
asdf1000 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 20 minutes ago, look&listen said: Also increased fragility & failure rate Mine has been working for 2 years but I did note earlier, many people have had reliability issues with the Corning optical USB cables. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now