Ralf11 Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 what kind of envelopment? cryptical envelopment ?? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 he said would but meant wouldn't... see: mics always discriminate; they never pick up all the sound energy that is impinging on their diaphragms Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 no my post is not in jest - one hopes that yours are no microphone is perfect Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 that isn't the question - ears are nowhere near perfect STC 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 how about: While imperfect, mics do not actively pay attention in the way a human listener does. by "pay attention" I mean the sorts of things cognitive psychos study in attentional processes - subject to change when Siri becomes self-aware fas42 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted July 27, 2018 Share Posted July 27, 2018 Schroeder, not Scroeder - for those inclined to look it up swarm subs can help with modes & nodes Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted August 3, 2018 Share Posted August 3, 2018 doesn't Kal have a "multichannel system for high-end music" ?? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Yo man - I am with you in Rockland! Any perception we have is the TRUTH! Teresa 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 "incredible" as in not credible? Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 17 hours ago, pkane2001 said: Still trying to figure out how to blind test this change.. quickly flipping a heavy speaker and de/resoldering a couple of connections is hard enough when not blindfolded... buy 40 identical speakers - eff up the solder on half, then have a relay box randomly switch them each time (it can record which is which) - you can economize by using mono with a speaker on each stereo channel Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 Why doesn't the mind compensate for crummy solder? or for mp3? vinyl? Where is the event boundary that sets the acquisition limit on the black hole of SQ for the mind to suck it all in and create the illusion of a space-time continuum? And.. since brain power is energetically expensive, why do I want to burn neuronic energy fields to create this illusion? What would Rudy Arnheim think of the Frankensteinian erection of high SQ from a "good enough" tweak of the wires? pkane2001 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted August 18, 2018 Share Posted August 18, 2018 it's cheaper too - why blow your hard earned sheckels on gear when you can Mentalize Yo Sound! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now