Teac 10MHz clock : CG - 10M

[mansr]

36 minutes ago, esldude said:

Master clocks are for syncing several devices.  The idea you improve sound with clocking locked to a better quality external clock is more audiophool woo.

This should be on a label attached to the clock input.

[mansr]

Why do people think the long-term stability (years) provided by atomic clocks is at all relevant to audio applications?

[mansr]

16 minutes ago, kevin gilmore said:

its not. But the jitter of the oscillator is important. Which is why the disciplined OCXO's sure seem to sound better than

the synthesized disciplined things. I really did not expect the quality of the sound to change, I was surprised.

An OCXO has very low jitter all by itself. The rubidium (or GPS) reference is only needed for extremely accurate frequency and long-term stability. Nobody can hear a difference of a few ppm, so that's pointless for audio.

[mansr]

I'm still waiting for any evidence these fancy clocks make an audible difference over a good TCXO.