Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Halide Design Bridge Review

    bridge-thumb.pngIn 2008 Devilsound Labs released its Digital Audio Cable. The idiot-proof USB to RCA DAC in-a-cable reviewed here on Computer Audiophile. Since the DAC’s release Devilsound Labs has changed its name to Halide Design and released The Bridge its new asynchronous USB to S/PDIF converter. The Bridge isn’t just another USB to S/PDIF device. Halide Design licensed Streamlength™ asynchronous USB code from Wavelength Audio to take this converter to another level. Not content to rely on Streamlength’s™ reputation as one of the best USB implementations available, Halide completed The Bridge with an innovative design in a very small package.

    [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

     

    Devilsound <s>Horns</s> Roots

     

    dsl.pngOver the last couple years I've talked to Jonathan and Aaron of Halide Design via email numerous times. Half of our conversations were about Halide Design products while the other half were about computer audio and the high end industry. After every conversation I always said to myself, "These guys are really cool, really smart, and have great potential in high end audio." There's a lot to like about the unjaded enthusiasm and ideals of Jonathan and Aaron. Never once have they talked about high margins and snake oil. It's really refreshing to hear their ideas about new high quality products at relatively reasonable prices. These guys are not in the business to separate people form their money. Jonathan and Aaron really have a passion for creating great sounding and innovative audio products.

     

    Jonathan and Aaron share many beliefs with the readers of Computer Audiophile. "Computer audio is here to stay, and at this point, can supply sound quality that matches or rivals the best audio devices out there. Computers can store all your music (lossless of course) and have moved from a novelty, to a convenience, to a central component of high resolution computer playback." Said Jonathan and Aaron.

     

    When Jonathan and Aaron first dipped their toes into designing commercial high end audio components, the company name Devilsound Labs seemed perfectly fine. At least it signified something different from the more traditional audio companies. According to Jonathan, "We wanted to make something for the "new generation" of audiophiles. Simple, small, easy to use, and relatively inexpensive. Thus was born the Devilsound DAC, our first product. The idea there was to take ideas that had been floating around in the audiophile world, such as non-oversampling on the D/A converter and high-quality interconnects, and add our own touches."

     

    The signature touches of Devilsound Labs products are good components, circuit design and layout, and compact size without sacrifice. In almost every audiophile endeavor shorter is better at keeping the audio path cleaner. During the design phase no opportunity is missed to make these paths shorter in the interest of better measurements and increased sonic accuracy.

     

    After the successful Devilsound DAC and a bit more experience under their belts Jonathan and Aaron decided to advance the company further with a new name and new product. They settled on Halide Design as the label to launch new products. It does sound much more professional and robust compared to the possibly juvenile Devilsound Labs.

     

     

     

    The Bridge

     

    Continuing with their signature design touches Jonathan and Aaron set out to make The Bridge USB to S/PDIF converter. They saw no need for the traditional S/PDIF output cable. Instead they aimed to clean the signal path by using what they call an "Active Interconnect" where the device is really a signal unit. "The advantage of eliminating unnecessary components is that it leads to reducing other unnecessary components. So for instance, since we don't need any sample rate converter or other bulky devices to clean up jitter, this saves board space, and makes it possible to build the device small enough to eliminate the cable as well." Said Jonathan.

     

    Short clean signal paths are not the only innovative design elements in The Bridge. Without a separate power supply The Bridge receives power via a USB port. Five volt power emanating from the less than satisfactory switching power supply of a computer is the last thing an audiophile wants feeding his components. To the layman it may appear there is no room in The Bridge's small CNC milled anodized aluminum frame to address this dirty power issue. Audiophiles are used to enormous linear power supplies, exotic power cords, and numerous power related products. I'm certainly guilty of running a separate power sub-panel to my listening room with dedicated circuits for the components. All of this seems so far from what is possible in the tiny Bridge USB to S/PDIF converter / Active Interconnect.

     

     

     

    "In order to supply clean power to the on-board circuitry, the Bridge uses a combination of power supply filtering and an newly released power down regulator. Power coming into the device is first PI filtered (CLC), which gives a two-pole attenuation for noise above roughly 3 kHz. This works to eliminate high frequency noise, which down-regulators are typically not as good at rejecting. This filtered signal, which is slightly less to 5 V (due to resistive elements in the passive filter), is down regulated to 3.3 V for the digital electronics, and an separate 3 V line for the clocks. Note that down-regulators tend to be excellent at rejecting noise at DC and lower frequencies, the rejection ratio falls off at higher frequencies. The combination of an initial LC filter and a regulator with high PSRR (70 dB at 10 Hz, a reduction factor of over 3,000), ultralow noise regulator insure that the clocks and the digital circuitry can operate as accurately as possible."

     

    "In order to isolate the output from the (potentially noisy) computer ground, and to avoid the possibility of ground loop noise, SPDIF commonly employs an output transformer. We use a small, high-quality output transformer, which allows excellent isolation and signal integrity in a small package." - Halide Design

     

     

     

    Removing unneeded internal circuitry and improving The Bridge's use of dirty computer power were two critical first steps. Getting to the next level of performance required the use of an asynchronous USB implementation. Not to be confused with Asynchronous Sample Rate Conversion (ASRC). Jonathan and Aaron were not satisfied with the existing adaptive USB or off the shelf implementations found in most USB audio devices. These guys look at everything from an engineering viewpoint as well as an audiophile sound quality viewpoint. Using either perspective it's easy to see or hear the advantages of an asynchronous design. (See <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Asynchronicity-USB-Audio-Primer">Asynchronicity USB Primer</a> here on CA for additional information). Halide Design didn't settle for just any asynchronous design as The Bridge needed to be completely plug n' play without additional device drivers to achieve the "Active Interconnect" concept.

     

    Jonathan and Aaron contacted Gordon Rankin of Wavelength Audio who developed Streamlength™ asynchronous USB code and licenses it to a limited number of high end audio manufacturers. Based on my conversations with Gordon it's evident he likes Jonathan and Aaron and thinks these guys have great potential as well. It should be noted that Gordon doesn't license his code to just anyone. Fortunately Halide Design was able to acquire the Streamlength™ license from Gordon and implement this asynchronous USB code in The Bridge.

     

    bnc.pngThe Bridge ships with a captive six foot USB cable that is capable of being extended with a standard USB extender or a much better optical USB extension and isolation device. The six foot cable length is a bit short for my system as I house my music servers outside my listening room. I typically use three meter USB cables that passthrough a port in the wall from my music servers to my audio components. Without a USB extender readily available during this review period I moved my <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Computer-Audiophile-Pocket-Server-CAPS">C.A.P.S.</a> silent music server next to my Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC. This eliminated the need for a longer USB cable but was a little inconvenient. The Bridge truly is plug n' play without the need to install any software of drivers. It supports bit transparent digital audio output at 44.1, 48, 88.2, and 96 kHz. The Bridge is available with Eichmann RCA or standard 75 ohm BNC terminations. During the review I used the BNC version connected directly to the BNC input of my Alpha DAC. Both versions are cryogenically treated and have a fully isolated output using a high quality digital audio transformer.

     

     

     

    bridge.png

     

     

     

    <b>The Bridge To Sonic Bliss?</b>

     

    Simply put, I was surprised by the high performance of The Bridge. I had an inkling The Bridge would be good based on its designers and the Streamlength™ USB code, but I didn't expect it would be this good. Playing all types of music The Bridge offered wonderful separation of the instruments and a clarity from top to bottom that was close to my Lynx AES16 PCI card. During the review I purchased Reference Recording's Crown Imperial by the Dallas Wind Symphony from HDtracks at <a href="https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=catalogdetail&valbum_code=HD030911111229">24 bit / 96 kHz</a>. I own the HRx version at <a href="http://www.referencerecordings.com/HRxORDER.asp">24 bit / 176.4 kHz</a> but The Bridge does not support sample rates above 96 kHz. Track eight on this album, Michael Daugherty's Niagara Falls, has become one of my favorites as a civilian and as a reviewer. Listening to Niagara Falls through The Bridge seemed to open another complete octave at the top end compared to other USB to S/PDIF devices I have used. The resolution and extension was so good I contacted a couple colleagues in the industry to discuss why I wasn't getting this level of performance from other converters. Specifically the M2Tech hiFace. My comparison between the hiFace and The Bridge was not a scientifically thorough longitudinal study conducted under controlled conditions. I have many hours of listening left before writing the complete hiFace review. It's entirely possible I'll be able to squeeze improved performance out of the hiFace in the coming days and weeks. As of now The Bridge is definitely my go-to USB to S/PDIF converter even if it is limited to 24/96 and below.

     

    Another clear sign of The Bridge's great performance can be seen through my listening habits during the review period. When I first placed The Bridge in my system I had the urge to listen to tons of music just to hear what it sounded like through The Bridge. I listened to a minute or two of what felt like hundreds of tracks. After twenty-four hours of this kid-like listening style I fell into complete album mode. I listened to whole albums one after the other. In the case of Shelby Lynne's new album Tears, Lies, and Alibis I listened to the same album three times in a row all the way through. This type of listening does not happen with every component and especially new components I'm not accustomed to hearing in my system. Sure the extremely low jitter specs of The Bridge play a role in its performance, but it's much easier for me to judge performance when my listening habits are altered by a component. I have other audio components here that can't hold my attention more than one or two minutes. The music through these components is simply inaccurate and unappealing causing my brain to tune out.

     

    During my last listening session with The Bridge I played the Anthony Wilson Trio's <a href="http://store.acousticsounds.com/d/61116/Anthony_Wilson_Trio-Jack_of_Hearts-Hybrid_Multichannel_SACD">Jack of Hearts</a>. This is a terrific album musically and sonically. I often play this album to hear how accurately components can reproduce drums and cymbals. On many mainstream recordings drums sound like someone is striking a piece of paper with a stick. This can make sonic quality judgments nearly impossible. Not so with Jack of Hearts. As far as I could tell The Bridge reproduced this recording with great accuracy. The drums sounded very good with space around them, appropriate reverb trials, and sharp transients. I'd have to ask Audioquest's Joe Harley for a 100% accuracy check as he was involved in the production of this fine album. Again, The Bridge performed great and was a pleasure to have in my system.

     

    Throughout the review I used J River Media Center v14 and v15 with WASAPI output. I was able to achieve bit transparent output without jumping through any hoops. I used the <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Computer-Audiophile-Pocket-Server-CAPS">C.A.P.S.</a> server running 32-bit Windows 7 Ultimate edition.

     

     

     

    <b>C.A.S.H. Worthy</b>

     

    cash-logo-black-thumb.jpgThe Halide Design Bridge asynchronous USB to S/PDIF converter has earned a well deserved spot on the Computer Audiophile Suggested Hardware List (<a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Computer-Audiophile-Suggested-Hardware-List">C.A.S.H. List</a>). This simple, small, single cable solution incorporates innovative design and the current holy grail of USB implementations asynchronous transfer mode, not to be confused with Asynchronous Sample Rate Conversion or ASRC. There are some fabulous DACs around without USB or FireWire input that will benefit greatly from the Halide Design Bridge. The Bridge enables audiophiles to use these existing DACs with almost any computer audio system available today. At $450 The Bridge is a relatively inexpensive component with great potential to bring any audio system into the future of high end audio reproduction. I highly recommend The Bridge from Halide Design to colleagues and Computer Audiophile readers around the globe.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Product Information

    <ul>

    <li>Price - $450</li>

    <li>The Bridge Product Page - <a href="http://www.halidedesign.com/bridge/">Link</a></li>

    <li>Product Design Details - <a href="http://www.halidedesign.com/bridge/design/">Link</a></li>

    <li>Halide Design Store - <a href="http://www.halidedesign.com/store/">Link</a></li>

    </ul>

     

     

     

    Associate Equipment:

     

    <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2010/0418/Brochure_Fidelio.pdf">Verity Audio Fidelio loudspeakers</a>, <a href="http://www.mcintoshlabs.com/products/mcintosh-mc275-vacuum-tube-power-amplifier.asp">McIntosh MC275 amplification</a>, <a href="http://www.richardgrayspowercompany.com/products.aspx?type=accessories">Richard Gray's Power Company High Tension Wires</a>, <a href="http://www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com/">Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC</a>, <a href="http://www.usbdacs.com/Products/Products.html">Wavelength Audio Proton</a>, <a href="http://www.ayre.com/products_detail.cfm?productid=12">Ayre AX-7e Integrated Amp</a>, <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Computer-Audiophile-Pocket-Server-CAPS">C.A.P.S. server</a>, <a href="http://www.belcantodesign.com/Product_USBlink.html">Bel Canto USB Link</a>, <a href="http://www.halidedesign.com/bridge/">Halide Design Bridge</a>, <a href="http://www.dcsltd.co.uk/product/debussy-dac"><i>d</i>CS Debussy DAC</a>, <a href="http://www.dcsltd.co.uk/product/puccini-u-clock"><i>d</i>CS Puccini U-Clock</a>, <a href="http://www.kimber.com/products/interconnects/digital/usb/bbus/cu/">Kimber USB Cu</a>, <a href="http://www.kimber.com/products/interconnects/digital/usb/bbus/ag/">Kimber USB Ag</a>, <a href="http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/system1/digital-analog-converter/dac1-pre">Benchmark DAC1 PRE</a>, <a href="http://www.kimber.com/products/interconnects/analog/select/singleended/ks1011/">Kimber Select KS1011 Analog Cables</a>, <a href="http://www.kimber.com/products/interconnects/digital/select/ks2020/">Kimber Select KS2020 Digital Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.kimber.com/products/loudspeakercables/monocle/x/">Kimber Monocle X Loudspeaker Cable</a>, <a href="http://usa.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=SPZfqXDJvadmFPoh&templete=2">ASUS Xonar HDAV 1.3 Slim</a>, <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/">Apple iPad</a>, <a href="http://www.amarraaudio.com/">Sonic Studio's Amarra</a>, <a href="http://www.m2tech.biz/products.html">M2Tech hiFace</a>, <a href="http://www.weiss-highend.ch/dac202/index.html">Weiss Engineering DAC202</a>, <a href="http://www.lynxstudio.com/product_detail.asp?i=13">Lynx Studio AES16 Digital I/O Card</a>.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    I've spent a good amount of time now perusing the HD website at:<br />

    <br />

    http://www.halidedesign.com/ <br />

    <br />

    …. At this location I see nothing, nada, zip, zilch in terms of SUPPORT or CONTACT info.<br />

    <br />

    Is this their website? how am I missing this? Where did they put it?<br />

    <br />

    Shouldn’t HD or the group formerly known as DeVille Sound, wish to have contact with their consumer base? Not just with the reviewers or other industry connections?<br />

    <br />

    I see not even a forum link on this page.<br />

    <br />

    Are these people an off shore manufacturer? USA? N. America?<br />

    <br />

    I see only links to the Bridge design, the CA review, and a Store or purchase page, HD further indicates the terms of sale have a sixty day return policy.... yet no return shipping info is openly published, nor is there any contac info for acquiring a return authorization, nor is there any link for FAQs, or Support info.<br />

    <br />

    All I see is info indicating it's great so buy it and you're on your own, in essence. I see nothing reassuring me following the transfer of my money.<br />

    <br />

    Am I misreading this site somehow? Are the links I've yet to find posted on some other now updated page or website?<br />

    <br />

    Normally, I'm quick to pass on ANY item which offers up only point of sale and self serving ads, and contains NOTHING resembling means of contacting the maker for Q's, support, or returns, at or prior to point of sale.<br />

    <br />

    The ONLY reason I’m not passing outright is or was, to see for myself how this limited functioning USB DAC INTERFACE, performs.<br />

    <br />

    I find this a bit off putting actually. All promotion, and no concrete or prior to affirmations, or assurances.<br />

    <br />

    it seems a hollow promise to mention a trial basis but not to mention any pointed contact info for the company... NOT even an email link? Sheeshh.<br />

    <br />

    These links must be available and I've merely missed seeing them ... Right? <br />

    <br />

    Thanks for any help here in advance.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is probably just an oversight on their part. I have had good communications with them through e-mail:<br />

    <br />

    [email protected]<br />

    <br />

    Both they and Phillip from Audiophileo have been very quick to respond to any questions I had about their respective converters. Send them an e-mail, I am sure they will put your concerns to rest.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In my book... that's some oversight!<br />

    <br />

    Thanks much for the link Barrows. Really, thanks.<br />

    <br />

    It's a real shame when the masses need to support the manufacturer's shortcomings by providing something as simple as a contact method which for all intents and purposes, were not and have not been seen as necessary by the makers of the HD Bridge.<br />

    <br />

    Naturally I trust you completely Barrows, but the heretofore mentioned failure to notice omissions like these being left out of the Home page of a manufacturer don't convey or instill an atmosphere of confidence.<br />

    <br />

    Such lacks aren’t keynotes of professionalism in business to my way of thinking.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Guys - It's actually not an oversight. The contact information is listed on this page on the left side. http://www.halidedesign.com/bridge/<br />

    <br />

    The Halide guys are trying to outsmart the spam bots by making the contact information part of a graphic image.<br />

    <br />

    That said, I've had numerous people contact me looking for the Halide contact info.<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Edit: Additional technical info is available at this URL http://www.halidedesign.com/bridge/design/<br />

    <br />

    It's kind of hard to find on the site.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris & fellow members,<br />

    <br />

    Would the Halide Bridge work well into the S/PDIF input of the Benchmark HDR DAC1?<br />

    <br />

    I ask this as I purchased the M2 Highface, thinking that as the Benchmark USB input is "adaptive" this would be a great fit. However, I was not overly impressed and in general concur with Chris's comments in his review of the Highface.<br />

    <br />

    I am very happy with the SQ out of the Benchmark USB into my Adam A7 active speakers, however, after reading all the hype about asynchronous technology it seemed logical to include it given I have an adaptive DAC.<br />

    <br />

    I know I need to listen for myself, however, any thoughts would be appreciated. Am I on the right track?<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    I’ll always commit to my own findings that the Hiface unit is anything but dull or shaded when properly applied in the context of a decent audio rig. If anything, I’d say it’s utterly vibrant and neutral transmitting every facet of the audio diagrams resolve and information laden scope that it’s being sent, and conveying it all in a most musical fashion to the downstream items/DAC in a less jitter added form.. Be it used in Kernel streaming, or WASAPI output config, using Fu 2K or JR MC..<br />

    <br />

    ... if you did try differing cables from the M2T device to your dac and the results were less than satisfactory, it would seem some other interface is required.<br />

    <br />

    Personally, I thought to try the halide gizmo myself… but felt after looking at the whole picture, moving on into a full fledged device which could output the entire range of current word lengths and sampling rates was a better idea than settling for only half of that spectrum. Consequently, and as Chris, among many others here use the often talked about but never reviewed on this site, Lynx AES 16x card, that would be the way to go…. As it seems to never have issues involving outputting info to any other DAC in for review here…. And it does handle all the various data compositions.<br />

    <br />

    Add to that the HDB has not since it’s review made it to ‘reference’ level around here… but the Lynx has…. And the Lynx has yet to be displaced. So very quietly that one component lingers around in each and every review of new gear, new DACs, new Software, servers, remotes, etc…. not the Hallide Design Bridge, Hiface, or too many others listed in the CA cash list or recommended hardware lists. Etc<br />

    <br />

    There’s a real statement in there if you look for it, which remains hushed and secretive…. Apparently.<br />

    <br />

    You’ll have to scour the web a bit though to find any subjective accounts on it’s powers and presentation or voice, as there’s no pointed account of that here…. Other than the undeniable fact it remains a vital cog in nearly EVERY review Chris posts. Albeit it’s a few dollars more than the HDB, but you get more, and you also get less controversy.<br />

    <br />

    If your application is for a desktop or server machine, and not a laptop, I’d suggest you save the extra duckets up and grab a PCI express Lynx AES 16… or some other in the Lynx family. They’re around 650 – 750 new if you look around…. Plus the cable (s)…. But the amount of hassles will drop off accordingly too, I suspect. In all, I’ll keep my BNC Hiface and distribute it’s use elsewhere in subordinate systems.<br />

    <br />

    Lastly, the new M2T eVO lays squarely in the price range of the HDB, and offers more flexibility. I gave that line up a long think…. But fell to the side of the Lynx for the above reasons instead.<br />

    <br />

    Very good luck to you which ever road you travel.<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have been using a Hiface with a Benchmark Dac/Pre, Mac Mini and Amarra for several weeks now, and for the same reason you were, to check it against the built in USB. I have had no issues with it and my impressions have been good. I do find it better than the stock USB. I ordered a Halide Bridge a few days ago as a further comparison.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Blindjim,<br />

    <br />

    "... if you did try differing cables from the M2T device to your dac and the results were less than satisfactory, it would seem some other interface is required".<br />

    <br />

    I have not experimented with different cables and from yours others comments maybe I should before being over critical of the Highface.<br />

    <br />

    I do not want to go the Lynx route as I want the ease of use and flexibility that comes with a USB connection.... I can use it on several different computers.<br />

    <br />

    Hi Housteau,<br />

    <br />

    I would very interested in your observations after comparing the Highface to the Halide Bridge/

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    Ajax<br />

    <br />

    there's definitely something to the digital cable interface itself. It's very very likely not going to attenuate any electrical overage being transmitted to any DAC, but the build characteristics and metalurgy of the conductor (s) and connectors will play a part in the resultant sound you achieve.<br />

    <br />

    I noticed a change as well simply moving from an RCA Hiface to a BNC model. <br />

    <br />

    I used 3 different RCA cables during my audition of the RCA unit, and each had a noticeably different affect on the sound. One was a 'El Cheapo' 2M RCA; One was my Stereovox XV2 RCA/BNC 1M; One was the Stereovox XV2 Ultra.<br />

    <br />

    the Ultra had the most natural sound of that lot and it was the easier listen.... not nearly as edgy or dry as the others. <br />

    <br />

    I even tried a uber expensive Nirvana digital RCA cable from a Sony SCD xa777 es &/or Oppo BDP 83, into my BC DAC 3. it ran $700 or so new.... <br />

    <br />

    I took a shot in the dark on the Oyaide all silver BNC 1.3M. it paid off IMHO. it's easily the class of those other digital cables IMHO, along with being the best value too.<br />

    <br />

    There are others around I thought to try but I felt it unecessary. I think if you either can live with what you have on hand, or better put, like what you're getting, keep doing what you're doing.<br />

    <br />

    Rather than fix it till it breaks.<br />

    <br />

    Is there some better still wire out there which bests the Oyaide silver BNC? Probably.<br />

    <br />

    For $220? Probably not.<br />

    <br />

    So I'm good with it until some folks run across some new whozit wire that gets tremendous raves on nearly all accounts... then I might try that one.<br />

    <br />

    I'd still offer up to you the option of the newer and reputedly better sounding, and far more flexible EVO from M2T, given your needs for multiple platforms USB use.<br />

    <br />

    .... luck

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    <br />

    Thanks much for the insights on your current use of the HDB, and Hiface/USB device. there’s always room for another objective account of this same device or gear…. It adds to the perception of it’s true abilities.<br />

    <br />

    I simply must try some other USB cables it seems, to connect my Hiface with…. Mine is simply plugged into a USB port on the confuser, and I use a BNC cable from it to my DAC. I did try two so far and was not nearly as well pleased as I am using the current Hiface + BNC cable arrangement.<br />

    <br />

    To avoid any bending, or pulling of the Hiface + SPDIF cable on my PC, I use a nylon zip tie in a noose like configuration, to suspend the Hiface from drooping down or being pulled this way or that…. And my pc lies on it’s side in my Sound Anchor Rack, atop some Bright Star nodes. I also use a Virtual Dynamics pc for power to the personal confuser via a dedicated ckt.<br />

    <br />

    Wires do matter IMHO. And at every intersection. I felt the BNC wire would have had the least impact of adding more jitter to the proposition, than using a USB cable. <br />

    <br />

    I feel many people confuse the aspects of different versus better or worse, when doing comparisons between components. Different is far easier a thing to discern. Better is not so easy sometimes. Sometimes better is hidden right in the midst of different…. Or it’s illusionary only. Simply appearing to be better when it remains only that of some distinctive difference… and in truth, no better at all.<br />

    <br />

    ….and if it’s found truly better or worse, then how is this just so? Setup plays such an immense portion within the confines of any audio system, as well as the listener, and the room itself. <br />

    <br />

    That’s why it always pains me greatly to see some overwhelming positive accounts for a certain thing, and then to see it admonished severely by one or two subjectively weightier press…. I often then wonder a great deal more as to the ‘why’ of such disparity…. As it then becomes a more confounding issue.<br />

    <br />

    So I feel aside from the variables of room and listener, and certainly the system performing the playback, How a thing is integrated into that system is as key a thing. In your case the config comes along as closely to that of the HDB as is possible…. DISALLOWING the addition of some more expensive SPDIF cabling.<br />

    <br />

    Your current config also enables the Hiface to reside in place at a far more affordable level, subtracting the cost of a pricey SPDIF cable from the equation.<br />

    <br />

    What would be really cool would be ascertaining which USB cable HD used in the construction of the Bridge…. I doubt seriously it is of some esoteric sort, rather one of great availability and lower or lowest cost, and from a major outlet for such things…. Like BelKin, DH labs, etc. it would seem as well a prerequisite for maintaining build integrity and performance consistency.<br />

    <br />

    I’m very curious to hear more of your subjective results as time moves forward and things get better run in…. though do try and guard against the trap of seeing purely different as better or worse…. If possible.<br />

    <br />

    Congrats and Thanks much so far, on your comparisons. I for one, appreciate it immensely.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My Bridge came in yesterday and I was able to do a little listening last evening. It couldn't be simpler to use, a true plug and play. A nice benefit to the design is that there are no further cables needed for the connection. With the Hiface an extension USB and an SPDIF cable is needed, and depending upon the make the cost difference between the two choices can become quite small.<br />

    <br />

    I currently have all three USB connections to the Benchmark, its own USB, the Hiface and the Halide Bridge. It isn't an instant comparison though. In order to switch between them their output needs to be selected on the Mac Mini, then Amarra and iTunes needs to be restarted. So, there is about a 30 second gap in there. Also, since I was alone I needed to get out of my seat to make the changes. <br />

    <br />

    My preliminary thoughts are very subjective as I cannot honestly single out exact specifics as to why I prefer one over the other. For me what appears to change and improve is the clarity and overall general focus of the material, along with a more relaxed presentation. Had I never experience either the HiFace, or Halide Bridge I would have been content with the built in USB, as that combined with the benefits of a HD playback best my transport. The HiFace is an improvement and I find the Bridge to be a step above that, but not yet by the huge margin that others have noted. However, that may very well change as I spend more time with it and I am able to do more involved comparisons with help from a friend.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would like to buy the Bridge, but does anyone know what would be better, RCA or BNC?<br />

    I have a Bryston BDA1 and I would go for BNC but RCA is more common I guess and I could use the Bridge in other DACs if I upgraded or replaced it.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    always choose BNC if you have the option. BNC is far superior to RCA for SPDIF connections.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would go for BNC every time, in the event you find a DAC with RCA you can get a BNC to RCA adaptor...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    the SQ is very pleasant to the ear from the Halide Bridge. <br />

    <br />

    Stereophile reviewed the device, (Dec 2010) and its high jitter rejection is a true credit to Halide and Gordon Rankin's hard yards to nail this dilemma. No wonder the Bridge is quiet and can resolve music with great detail, take a look at the measurements, they speak for themselves.<br />

    <br />

    http://www.stereophile.com/content/halide-design-spdif-bridge-usb-spdif-converter<br />

    <br />

    If you can control jitter at the interface, the DAC has less to drama to decode the real signals from the rubbish.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd like to pick up a BNC to RCA adapter for the Halide Bridge. I only see really inexpensive adapters available ($1-$4 for a BNC F to RCA F adapter). Given the cost of the Bridge, I'm feeling a little guilty for spending so little on the adapter and hope it's not going to degrade the sound from the Bridge, especially since that's all I can find!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just received one of these in the mail, which I ordered, largely based upon this review.<br />

    <br />

    Two concerns:<br />

    <br />

    1. Twice now I have tried to use this and no signal comes out unless I unplug the USB and plug it right back in. The bridge appears as one of the sound output options, but it is dead until I unplug it and plug it back in, which is a significant annoyance.<br />

    <br />

    2. I am struggling to hear any difference between this and my optical cable. I worry that maybe my Nova simply isn't able to benefit from the improvement the bridge offers. Since it is plug (and replug) and play, I don't know if I am doing anything wrong. I've tried a variety of music, different sampling frequencies, speakers, headphones, and I cannot detect any difference. Not a hair.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I sure hope you resolved your problems. My Bridge was plug'n'play, with no issues whatsoever. Anytime I've had problems with playback it's seemed to have had something to do with iTunes or Amarra, but never the Bridge.<br />

    <br />

    In terms of sound quality, I don't know what to tell you. I would think that your Peachtree Nova should be more resolving and revealing than my Arcam AVR350 receiver supplied by my Cambridge Audio 840C dac section. Yet the difference the Bridge made in my system (between my Mac Mini and the 840C)was profound! Not subtle in the least.<br />

    <br />

    Prior to the Bridge I was using a M2tech HiFace BNC (great detail and soundstage, but a bit edgy), then a jkeny modded HiFace (smooth, round sound, analog sounding, but I experienced problems with the batteries), then finally the Halide Bridge. The Bridge not only seemed to display the best qualities of both the HiFace BNC and the modded version, it brought a very real presence to the listening space. Music sounded closer to "live" than it ever had.<br />

    <br />

    It's funny, but the difference was so profound that it took me a couple of days to get used to it... or maybe it just took some time to settle in. <br />

    <br />

    But if you can't discern a difference between the Bridge and toslink... I've got to think that something is amiss! Hope you get it worked out!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, it did it again today, and I am still struggling to hear a difference. Quite frustrating. I keep forgetting I am supposed to be enjoying the music. Maybe I just have a brain tumor or something that prevents me from hearing what everyone else does.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    @wgscott<br />

    <I><br />

    1. Twice now I have tried to use this and no signal comes out unless I unplug the USB and plug it right back in. The bridge appears as one of the sound output options, but it is dead until I unplug it and plug it back in, which is a significant annoyance.<br />

    </I><br />

    <br />

    I have been experiencing the same thing and I just found out the cause in my system. I have a signal "lock" Indicator on my dac and every time someone rang the electric door bell, the signal becomes unlocked. And I have to replug the USB to lock the signal again. Must be the spike in the 5v USB power. This make me quite nervous as it doesn't have its own gavanically isolated power supply like the jenny hiface mod or the hiface evo (both of which I have not tried) and there is this idea in my head that it may affect the sound quality. <br />

    <br />

    The halide bridge sounds great though, and definitely better than toslink output on my system. Tonality is roughly the same, so looks in the imaging and spatial qualities. <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When I was playing with a glass toslink cable a few months ago, I noticed a drop-out phenomenon caused by a voltage spike generated when I turned off my electric dog shears (I was grooming the dog and had it plugged into the same circuit as the nova and mini). So that kind of thing can definitely happen. What I discovered was that the DC (I presume) spike or interference could get through the 2010 mini power supply and into the computer and then have an effect upon the output signal. I then bought a power filter (tripplite) and plugged the mini into that and it cured the problem). We tend to worry about the noise our computer power supplies generate, but I found that for me at least it was a bigger problem in the other direction. Since I live in the Santa Cruz mountains, power anomalies during winter storms are quite frequent, so buying the power filter/surge protector was probably something I should have done anyway.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    I was just wondering if you have done any more testing since your previous blog on the sound difference using the various inputs: USB vs HighFace vs Halide Bridge into your Benchmark DAC?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The customer service for this company is extremely pro-active and like nothing I have experienced before. They identified the problem and I think it is fixed and I can hear a significant sound quality improvement as well.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wgscott,<br />

    <br />

    I'm glad to hear you got the problem resolved and are enjoying improved sound. May I ask what the problem was? Having a Nova myself, this is of interest to me.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...