Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Auraliti PK100 File Player Review

    front_overhead_crop7-thumb.jpgDemian Martin and Ray Burnham of Auraliti must frequently feel like Russel Ziskey teaching Basic English in the movie Stripes <a href="

    ">[Link]</a><a href="
    "><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>. Almost everybody mispronounces their company name Auraliti. I admit to mangling the name a few times myself. An easy way to learn and remember the correct pronunciation is to repeat the words Audio and Reality as fast as one can over and over. Soon enough the tongue and lips get lazy and a shortened version of the two words is spoken as Auraliti. The name rhymes with the company's tagline - Welcome to the new audio reality. Auraliti's first product is the PK100. The name is not nearly as creative but mispronunciations will be very limited. The PK100 is an extremely basic yet highly refined purpose built file player. Readers seeking a multi-purpose computer capable of playing music and calculating the monthly grocery budget should look elsewhere. Computer audiophiles seeking a simple user interface, with no user intervention required or allowed, and automatic bit perfect playback of music from 16/44.1 kHz through 24/192 kHz may want to seek a new audio reality with the Auraliti PK100.

    [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

     

     

     

    <b>What is it, What Does it Do, What Doesn't it Do?</b>

     

     

    <b>What is it?</b>

     

    The PK100 file player is a computer underneath it's understated black metal housing. This computer is configured to function like a toaster. When I put bread in my toaster and depress the lever I can guarantee toast will pop up after a few minutes. It's that simple. Insert bread + depress lever = toast every time. The PK100 is a file player that requires no setup. In fact it cannot be setup by the end user. The PK100 arrives from Auraliti pre-configured and set in a read-only state of operation. When I connect music via USB hard drive to the PK100 the music appears in one of the many remote control applications and starts paying when I hit the play button within the app. Connect music + Select music = Play music. It's so easy even a caveman could … oh wait that's been used already. The PK100 design can be described with an analogy to the automobiles used in NASCAR races. The cars are purpose built to drive in an oval turning only to the left at a high rate of speed. For example Dale Earnhardt, Jr. drives a Chevrolet Impala on the track. This Impala would not function as an every day driver because all the modern conveniences such as power locks, windshield wipers, trunk, back seat, and normal tires, to name a few, have been removed. The PK100 is designed to play music and will not function as an every day computer because all the modern conveniences such as printing, office applications, and internet browsers have been removed or excluded from installation. It's not even possible to rip CDs with the PK100. Geeks will be happy to read the PK100 uses Linux with MPD installed to a small solid state flash drive set as read-only on an Intel D945GSEJT Johnstown Mini-ITX motherboard and a completely fanless design. Non-geeks should know that this is a great configuration that's nearly indestructible short of physical damage. The power can be removed and the user can click, the mouse, more times than people speaking the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoisan_languages">Khoisan languages</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoisan_languages"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> without impacting the file player's configuration or functionality. Astute readers may have already noticed the PK100 is very similar to the Bryston BDP-1. The two players use the same concept of a Linux operating system, MPD, attaching USB drives, and iPhone control. Many of the differences between the PK100 and the BDP-1 are hardware related. The most obvious visible difference being the expensive casework housing the Bryston BDP-1. The PK100 is a very small square running 7.5 x 7.5 x 2.25 in and weighing in at 5 lbs. including power supply.

     

    <center><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/front_overhead_crop7.jpg"></img></center>

     

     

     

    <b>What Does it Do?</b>

     

    The Auraliti PK100 file player is not a jack of all trades music server. It simply connects to a USB drive full of music, an external DAC, and an Ethernet port. The PK100 supports zero-config or what's commonly called Apple's Bonjour communication protocol that enables configuration free connecting from one device to another. Bonjour allows users of the PK100 to open a web browser and type http://auraliti-player.local into the URL box and be presented with the player's web interface. There is no need to find the player's IP Address on the local area network in order to connect to the unit. The player comes with a <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/auraliti-player.local.png" class="thickbox" rel="auraliti-01">simplistic web interface</a> that directs users to its pre-installed control software (NeoMPC) and to other sites where users can download other applications to control the PK100. The built-in <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/original/IMG_0012.PNG" class="thickbox" rel="auraliti-02">NeoMPC interface</a> is text based and allows the user to browse the folders of the attached hard drives. It's very straight forward and doesn't require a training session before the user is well versed in using the player. NeoMPC functions very well on the iPad but is not the best control app for readers using an iPhone. The NeoMPC buttons are very small via the iPhone.

     

    One of the best things about the PK100 is it's only capable of outputting a bit perfect audio signal. Without any configuration options for the user there is no way to screw this one up. Most other players on the market require anywhere from minor to major adjustments before they're capable of bit perfect playback. The PK100 supports FLAC, WAV, AIFF, and MP3 according to Auraliti, but I was able to play some lossy 256 kbps AAC downloads from the iTunes Music Store without an issue. Another very impressive feature of the PK100 is its ability to play all relevant sample rates from 16 bit / 44.1 kHz through 24 bit / 192 kHz without a hiccup. The PK100 automatically changes the sample rate based on music selected for playback assuring the user of bit perfect operation. I like to test manufacturer's claims so this is one of the first items I test when receiving a product for review. The PK100 passed with flying colors.

     

    A feature I did not use is the built-in Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) with modified analog RCA outputs. The DAC is a 24 bit AKM that's capable of sample rates from 16/44.1 through 24/192. I prefer to use an external DAC with volume control and a few other features. The built-in DAC may be very nice for users just entering the computer audio world who don't want to purchase another piece of gear or simply don't have room for another box on their desk or in their living room. This is a great way start with a minimal outlay of cash.

     

     

     

    <b>What doesn't it do?</b>

     

    Understanding what a product does and does not do is key when making a smart purchasing decision. This way there are no surprises when the new product is connected to the audio system. There is nothing worse than purchasing one component and realizing another product of equal or greater value must be purchased in order for the initial product to function as needed. Readers considering the PK100 must know that another computer is required to use this file player. The other computer is not required while playing music rather it's required for housekeeping tasks such as ripping CDs and editing metadata.

     

     

    Here are some important considerations for potential PK100 buyers.

    <ol>

    <li>No physical CD/DVD drive</li>

    <li>No ability to rip CDs</li>

    <li>No Network Attached Storage (NAS) support yet</li>

    <li>No usable onboard hard drive</li>

    <li>No physical buttons or user interface on the actual player chassis</li>

    <li>No USB or FireWire DAC support</li>

    <li>No Squeezebox / SqueezeCenter</li>

    <li>No iTunes music sharing capability</li>

    <li>No UPnP support</li>

    </ol>

     

     

    Some readers will look at this list and consider the PK100 worthless. In fact that's a good thing because these readers are likely not the ideal user for the PK100. Readers seeking all the above features in a single box can immediately rule out this Auraliti unit and move on in their search for a music player or server. Remember the PK100 was created to play music and do it very well. There are many reasons why the PK100 doesn't offer the above features. There is no need for a physical CD/DVD drive since the player does not rip discs. The design decision to not include the CD ripping capability in the PK100 was very smart. Currently there are numerous applications that rip CDs very well and allow the user to edit the metadata. There's no reason for Auraliti to either reinvent the wheel with its own ripping app or to enable one of the open source ripping applications. In fact enabling the PK100 to rip CDs would require enabling many other features that have nothing to do with playing music. For example the PK100 would have to allow access to the attached hard drives over the network, for metadata editing purposes, thus becoming a network file sharing server. There is really no reason to enable features 100% of the time when they are used 1% of the time. The PK100 file player has a very purist design. Support for Network Attached Storage that would allow the PK100 to pull files from a NAS drive would be nice but would also involve more complexity from a design and usability perspective. I believe Auraliti is working on a NAS of its own that will function seamlessly with the PK100. No official release date has been provided as of this writing. The only drive the PK100 ships with is the onboard solid state flash drive. This drive is not usable for music storage as its very small and marked as read only. Auraliti was wise not to include a usable hard drive in this unit. Companies like Seagate, Hitachi, Toshiba, and Samsung are far better at selling and servicing hard drives than Auraliti. Plus, user size requirements are all over the board and advances in storage technology happen very quickly. If Auraliti did ship the PK100 with an internal hard drive I'm wiling to bet many users would replace it with a drive of their choice anyway. One feature the PK100 doesn't offer and the Bryston BDP-1 does is a front panel display with user interface. This type of display can have negative consequences on sound quality. According to Auraliti excluding such a display, <i>"eliminates background processes which induce jitter inducing interrupts and noise from the GPU supplying a graphic interface."</i> Readers who like the ability to see exactly what's happening or the ability to physically press play on an actual audio component may find the PK100's lack of onboard display frustrating. Perhaps the biggest potential show-stopper with the PK100 is its current lack of support for USB and FireWire DACs. Audiophiles with wonderful USB or FireWire DACs will have to think long and hard about replacing their DAC to accommodate the PK100's S/PDIF output. Auraliti did have a <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0107/large/IMG_0698.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Auraliti-00">USB capable unit on display</a> at The Show in Las Vegas this year but there is not scheduled release date yet. Lack of UPnP support, Squeezebox / SqueezeCenter support, and iTunes music sharing support are the three remaining items users should consider before purchasing the PK100. Some servers offer these options as they allow users to access or send music to other devices or rooms in one's house. It's been my experience that these server type features are best run from a NAS device not a high quality file player like the PK100. Again, Auraliti was wise to exclude these and many other features from the PK100. This file player is certainly not for everyone. Understanding what it doesn't offer should be something every potential purchaser considers.

     

     

     

    <b>The Auraliti PK100 In My Listening Room</b>

     

    In my listening room I used the PK100 in a few different systems. I spent a considerable amount of time with the unit connected to a new Peachtree iNova integrated amp with Peachtree D5 loudspeakers. I also used the PK100 connected to my Benchmark DAC1 PRE sitting on my desk with a pair of Sennheiser HD600 headphones. The PK100 produced absolutely no audible noise when placed at arms length on my desk. Originally this was not a configuration I was going to try but for testing purposes I gave it a shot and fell in love with this little system. The PK100 would be a great addition to many office audio systems no matter what components are already in place. Using one's office computer for music playback just doesn't cut it anymore once you've tried the PK100 approach. I highly recommend CA readers give this a shot.

     

    To give readers a better idea of how to use the PK100 I compiled a step by step list of the process I used in my system.

     

    <ol>

    <li>Connected the PK100 to my home network via a single ethernet cable.</li>

    <li>Connected the PK100 to the Peachtree iNova via coaxial S/PDIF cable with a BNC connection on the PK100 end and a BNC with RCA adapter on the iNova end.</li>

    <li>On my OS X 10.6.6 MacBook Pro I formatted my external 750GB Oyen Digital USB hard drive as FAT32. This enabled me to read and write to this drive from my Mac or PC.</li>

    <li>On my Windows 7 PC (MacBook Pro running Boot Camp) I ripped music using dBpoweramp to the 750GB USB drive in FLAC format.</li>

    <li>I also copied AIFF files and other FLAC files from my NAS drive to the 750Gb USB drive.</li>

    <li>I ejected the 750GB USB drive from the MacBook Pro and connected the USB drive to the Auraliti PK100.</li>

    <li>On my MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.6 I opened my web browser (Google Chrome) and typed http://auraliti-player.local into the URL box. This brings up the PK100 home page.</li>

    <li>Once a USB drive is connected the PK100 can take a few minutes to search the hard drive and create its local database of music contained on the drive. I used the NeoMPC user interface to check on the status of the database building process. This user interface is accessed by clicking a link on the PK100 home page.</li>

    <li>Once the database was fully populated I mainly used the free <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/mpod/id285063020?mt=8">MPoD</a><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/mpod/id285063020?mt=8"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> iPhone application to browse and play music straight from the connected 750GB USB drive. I also use NeoMPC from my iPad as there is no iPad version of MPod available at this time. An iPad version currently named MPaD is in development. I briefly used the Mac OS X application Theramin to control the PK100 but the experience was less than enjoyable.</li>

    </ol>

     

     

    <center>Example Configuration Using External dCS Debussy DAC</center>

    <center><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/Auraliti-01.png"></img></center>

     

     

     

     

     

    <img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/Auraliti-02.png" style="padding: 5pt 10pt 5pt 5pt;" align="left">The process to add music to the 750GB hard drive was very straight forward. I disconnected the drive form the PK100, connected it to my MacBook Pro, ripped a CD to the drive in any folder structure I wanted, ejected the drive from the MacBook Pro, and reconnected the drive to the PK100. While this process is easy I did get tired of moving the drive back and forth to add more music. I purchase three to five CDs per week which required me to go through the hard drive routine fairly often. Whether this is a show-stopper or not can only be answered by each individual. I would much prefer ripping my CDs to a NAS drive and refreshing the library on the PK100 with the click of a mouse or tap of the iPhone screen.

     

     

     

     

    <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/neompc-with-folder.jpg.png" class="thickbox" rel="Auraliti-03"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/neompc-with-folder.jpg-thumb.png" style="padding: 5pt 10pt 5pt 5pt;" align="left"></a>The music I placed on the 750Gb hard drive for use with the PK100 was FLAC and AIFF originally ripped via dBpoweramp. Both types of files had all metadata including cover art embedded into each individual file. Using NeoMPC and MPod I was able to view all the metadata and cover art when paling FLAC files. FLAC is by far the best format for embedded metadata on all platforms except iTunes. MPod also handled AIFF embedded metadata without issue. NeoMPC on the other hand required a picture of the cover art be placed in each album folder and named folder.jpg in order to view AIFF cover art. Thus NeoMPC doesn't support embedded cover art with AIFF files. Ripping with dBpoweramp allows users to embed with cover art and simultaneously place the cover art into a folder.jpg file. This is a great way to cover more bases when ripping a collection. It's impossible to know what platform one will use in the future so this belt and suspenders approach is highly recommended.

     

     

     

     

    <center>

    <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/original/IMG_0969.PNG" class="thickbox" rel="Auraliti-MPoD"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/thumb/IMG_0969.png"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/original/IMG_0970.PNG" class="thickbox" rel="Auraliti-MPoD"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/thumb/IMG_0970.png"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/original/IMG_0978.PNG" class="thickbox" rel="Auraliti-MPoD"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/thumb/IMG_0978.png"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/original/IMG_0968.PNG" class="thickbox" rel="Auraliti-MPoD"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/thumb/IMG_0968.png"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/original/IMG_0971.PNG" class="thickbox" rel="Auraliti-MPoD"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/thumb/IMG_0971.png"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/original/IMG_0977.PNG" class="thickbox" rel="Auraliti-MPoD"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0228/mpod-images/thumb/IMG_0977.png"></a>

    </center>

     

     

     

     

    Sonically the PK100 out-punts its coverage or out-performs it's $799 price point by a long shot. The internal Juli@ audio card in combination with the single purpose finely tuned Linux operating system is every bit as good or better than a PC or Mac with Lynx AES16 audio card. It's impossible to compare apples to apples here because the Lynx AES16 cannot be placed into the PK100 chassis. It's very likely the Lynx would benefit from a simplified Linux OS, but I have a hard time believing it would sound better than the stock PK100. No doubt a fair amount of this great sound quality stems from PK100 designer Demian Martin's incredible knowledge and skill. Many Computer Audiophile readers already use components designed by Demian from Spectral Audio, NuForce, and a host of others for which Demian does't take credit publicly. He frequently shares much of his computer audio knowledge here on the CA forums. I'm always surprised when Demian spends his own time to research what may seem like an inconsequential issue raised by a CA reader and share his findings in a detailed response.

     

    Simply because I can I briefly compared the PK100 to my Pyramix machine with a several thousand dollar Mykerinos audio card running into a Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC. This is a totally ridiculous comparison on many levels including price and the user unfriendly professional software interface of Pyramix software. To my ears in my system the Pyramix / Mykerinos combination was clearly more resolving. In addition readers should know a very nice feature of the Mykerinios card, and a Lynx card, is the ability to externally clock the card from a DAC with word clock output such as the Weiss DAC202. External clocking is not a feature of the PK100 but I'm pretty positive nearly all PK100 users are thankful for this exclusion as an externally clocked card is quite cumbersome to operate.

     

     

     

    <b>Conclusion</b>

     

    The Auraliti PK100 is a finely tuned well designed computer file player. It's simple user interface that requires no tweaking is a major benefit to many computer audiophiles. The fact that users can't adjust any settings and obtain bit perfect playback automatically cannot be emphasized enough. this is a big deal. In my experience the most common cause of dissatisfaction with computer based sound quality is lack of bit perfect output. The PK100 completely solves this issue. Potential PK100 purchasers should ensure they've considered all the features this player offers and does not offer. This player is not a one size fits all music server and will not help complete one's taxes before April 18, 2011. The PK100 is capable of changing the way one listenings to music with it's highly refined minimalist feature set and simple operation. My tagline for this CA recommended player is, The Auraliti PK100 connect, select, and play.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    <b>Product Information</b>

     

    <ul>

    <li>Price - $799</li>

    <li>Product Page - <a href="http://auraliti.com/PK100_Store.html">Link</a><a href="http://auraliti.com/PK100_Store.html"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li>Quick Installation Guide - <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0228/PK100quickinstallguide.pdf">(PDF)</a></li>

    <li>Auraliti Simplified - <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0228/Auraliti_Simplified.pdf">(PDF)</a></li>

    </ul>

     

     

    <ul>

    <li>Plays FLAC, WAV, AIFF, and MP3 music files</li>

    <li>44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, and 192 KHz</li>

    <li>Automatically selects for correct sample rate</li>

    <li>Remote control from any web browser</li>

    <li>Bit perfect, low jitter, and no resampling</li>

    <li>SPDIF 75 ohm BNC digital</li>

    <li>Internal Digital to Analog converter allows option of RCA output or*balanced*output*over TRS connectors</li>

    </ul>

    <b>Analog output</b>: RCA stereo pair

    <b>Optional Analog output</b>: Balanced differential TRS connections

    <b>Dimensions</b>: 7.5 x 7.5 x 2.25 in; 190 x 190 x 55 mm

    <b>Weight</b>: 5 lbs, 2.27 Kg with power supply

     

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    TRS (1/4" three circuit jack) is the equivalent of an XLR 3 circuit connector except in a smaller space. I'm sure someone will have a heated opinion on which sounds better but I don't think its a significant issue since the signals are the same on both sides.<br />

    <br />

    I'm not sure why Chris didn't listen to the analog outputs either. Evaluating components can be a lot of work and adding another element just makes it harder, so I can understand that he passed on the analog outputs since its not his central interest.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <cite>1) does anyone use balanced interconnects? If so how many of you use XLR? how may use TRS?</cite><br />

    <br />

    I do. Pro-audio equipment tends to use both types of connectors, TRS is typically used to save some space on back/front panel. I make my own cables using Neutrik connectors with TRS on one end and XLR on the other.<br />

    <br />

    Unfortunately it seems to be quite hard to find those kind of cables ready made.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If by ready made, you mean shippable for two-day delivery a la Amazon, agreed. But I have never had any trouble getting balanced ICs.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <cite>If by ready made, you mean shippable for two-day delivery a la Amazon, agreed.</cite><br />

    <br />

    I didn't mean internet postal orders.<br />

    <br />

    <cite>But I have never had any trouble getting balanced ICs.</cite><br />

    <br />

    There are tons of XLR-XLR cables in shops here, but I haven't seen a single TRS-XLR balanced cable. For example Supra catalog doesn't list such.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I currently use XLR balanced from both my DVD/CD player and my DAC to my pre-amp.<br />

    <br />

    I used to have an EMU sound card which needed TSR - RCA adapters (single ended - found at Guitar Center)<br />

    <br />

    I used to have Cardas RCA - XLR single ended cables from a DAC to an RCA only headphone amp. I had to find this with google and order from the internet.<br />

    <br />

    Lastly, my balanced headphone setup uses XLR cables from DAC to Amplifier, and XLR outputs to my headphones.<br />

    <br />

    Common enough connectors, more commonly seen in "pro" gear, and chosen for signal rejection, especially for longer runs. Seen in higher end hifi gear for that reason, it is a bit more costly to implement well, and not frequently needed.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Can files be sent to the USB drive over the ethernet while the drive is connected to the PK100?<br />

    The Bryston BDP-1 supports this, which keeps the player from having to discover all the files upon reconnection.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As similarly stated above by Demian in an earlier post, we chose not to enable CIFS (SAMBA) access to USB devices temporarily connected to the player. It is another chunk of software with configuration and security issues to struggle with plus issues around explaining it to users. We are enabling it in the server we are testing now. The storage volumes on the Server are internal and will avoid confusion as to which connected drive one might have meant to load a file too.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    thanks Ray. You were talking so far over my head that I hadn't realized the earlier post was responding to my question....<br />

    :-).<br />

    <br />

    What's the ETA on the L1000?<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for the review. I have been happily using the PK 100 for about 5 months now and am very happy with it. Superb low cost single purpose machine that allows for use with a broad range of "legacy" dacs.<br />

    <br />

    Cheers<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Obviously there is some difference (ESi Juli@ Vs Lynx AES16 and different Linux distributions) but the Auraliti is a very similar concept to the Sonore you preiously reviewed... can you give any indication how they compared?<br />

    <br />

    Eloise

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After many mounths...first of all hello to all friends.<br />

    Like new customer (waiting for the device:) I want to ask to you if somebody has some experience with SSD, HDD and flash USB.<br />

    A) The new feature (enclosure with SATA filter) will be an upgrade for the only SATA owners? B) Is better use a USB power device than the not powered?<br />

    Thanks for the answ and sorry for my english.<br />

    <br />

    Luca<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am also keen on learning the reviewer's experience comparing the PK100 and similar products. <br />

    <br />

    BTW, a semi-completed Voyage MPD Starter Kit is available via the Voyage store at a very reasonable price. <br />

    <br />

    I also wonder how it fare against the Auraliti products.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    anyone can comment how Auraliti will sound compare to weiss 202

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Are not really equivalent. The Weiss 202 is a DAC and the PK100 is a player (virtual transport). The PK100 has an analog output but no pretensions to be the same level as the Weiss. Otherwise they don't connect except through SPDIF. The PK100 does not support Firewire.<br />

    <br />

    As a combo they may be very good.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is there any update on the release date for the Auraliti L1000?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ok, how is the sound quality of Auraliti PK100 compare with Weiss TNT 202 when using both as digital interface ?<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The PK100 is a different device entirely from a Weiss INT202 You would connect the output of a PK100 to a Weiss dac as a system. The Weiss INT202 would connect between a firewire source and a DAC. The PK100 is an appliance based on a computer to supply content to devices like the Weiss DAC. The PK100 does not support firewire so it would not work with the Weiss INT202. However you can come directly to the Weiss DAC202 from the PK100 and play content from a USB stick or drive connected to the PK100.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As a keen listener of music, with an extensive collection of both reel to reel (very undervalued as a high quality source) and vinyl (Well Tempered Reference t /t, Transfiguration cart), I recognise that the K100 / K1000 and digital solutions generally represent the next frontier, and I need to get better acquainted with the options. I'm following this thread with a great deal of interest because I get the "simplicity" and "value for money" propositions, but what I'm still left pondering is, what do I need in total to hook into my existing system to generate a better result than I'm currently getting? Clearly that involves hi - rez downloads. What does the total line - storage device, K100 / k1000, dac - look like at a number of price / performance points?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    An Auraliti-based system is pretty simple. The basic file player (PK-100 @ $799 or L1000 @ an estimated $3000), a USB hard drive (a 3 TB drive goes for less than $200, smaller sizes less), and a display/remote control like an iPod, iPad, or any device with WiFi and a browser. The remote device can range from around $200 to well over $600. I like the size of on-screen controls on a larger screen, although I can't afford one. The most expensive part of the system may be the DAC. As I discovered in my review of the PK100, the better DAC you use, the better sound you get. Since DAC prices range widely, that part is up to you. Same for cables; you only need a S/PDIF (PK100) or AES/EBU (L1000) cable, and there is a wide variation in those prices. The USB cable probably doesn't make a difference in sound. The CAT 5 or 6 cable shouldn't cost a lot, either.<br />

    <br />

    Hope that's what you're looking for.<br />

    <br />

    Vade Forrester

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    So, how does the internal DAC sound?<br />

    <br />

    I was about to buy a Mac Mini + HRT Streamer 2 + external HDD, but now think this might be the way to go... <br />

    <br />

    It's very simple, and allows me to add another DAC down the road.<br />

    <br />

    Any thoughts on using the internal DAC?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    Also, can I rip CDS in itunes, (and therefore keep all my files in iTunes for syncing with my iDevices) but also use these ripped files on the Auraliti? And if using iTunes to rip will the metadata be intact while using the remotes?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've only taken a quick glance at the Auraliti website and through this lengthy thread and from what I can tell this is almost the device I've been looking for and wondering why it didn't exist (and unfortunately still doesn't seem to).<br />

    <br />

    Contrary to popular opinion, this device is still too complex and therefore expensive. <br />

    <br />

    For audiophiles on a budget, and for those who think simple is best, a simpler still, yet quality front end would be ideal. In other words the Auraliti minus the internal dac/analog outs, and plus interface software built in that can be sent to tv, or monitor via video out (so that no computer and/or network has to be involved.<br />

    <br />

    A myriad of network and hd players optimized for video exist ($70-$200), and yes they play audio (but mostly as an afterthought). And cd players, dvd players and even receivers can play files from usb drives, so it's obviously possible and should be relatively inexpensive to produce a QUALITY simple stand alone player. So how about a simple Auraliti to go along with the flagship model? Please?<br />

    <br />

    Chris

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    It seems to me that this IS the simple audiophile device.<br />

    <br />

    Take me for example. I have a fantastic audiophile set up (Meridian monoblock amps, transport, and pre-amp, Linn speakers, Basis Audio turntable) yet I stream audio files through iTunes to my 17-year-old Meridian DAC built into my preamp. This sounds pretty good, but I really could use an upgrade. I don't want to spend a ton of money, so as far as I can tell the solution is to buy a mac mini+external HDD+DAC.... easily $2000.<br />

    <br />

    But this Auraliti is a one-box solution for $800 + a decent cable.<br />

    <br />

    I'm thinking about giving it a go.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...