Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    C.A.P.S. v2.0

    m10_shot2-s.jpgEarly in 2010 the original Computer Audiophile Pocket Server design was published on CA. At the time I wasn't sure if readers would be interested in building their own servers. I thought it would be a great thing if many computer audiophiles used the exact same music server. This could ease troubleshooting and enable the sharing of successful tweaks among all C.A.P.S. users. I had no idea the C.A.P.S. server would become incredibly popular among computer audiophiles. Many CA readers commented on the original build with suggestions to make it better while others were delighted someone else had done all the work. I was very happy to read both types of comments. After the original Pocket Server debuted I began fielding questions about it at every computer audio seminar I attended. A few months later in true computer audiophile fashion everyone was asking about the next C.A.P.S. server. The inquiries were a double-edged sword. I was thrilled so many people expressed interest in the server. At the same time pressure was building to create something better. After nearly 18 months I believe I have something better. It is with great pleasure that I reveal the Computer Audiophile Pocket Server version 2.0!

    [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

     

     

     

    <font size="4"><b>C.A.P.S. Version 2.0</b></font>

     

    I was originally going to release version 1.5 as a minor update to the first Pocket Server. I was underwhelmed by some of the "upgrades" available from computer component manufacturers and couldn't justify calling it version 2.0. However, I have since scrapped the design of v1.5, wiped the slate clean, and built new version 2.0. This is not a minor upgrade to <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Computer-Audiophile-Pocket-Server-CAPS">version 1.0</a><a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Computer-Audiophile-Pocket-Server-CAPS"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>. I have tentative plans for version 3.0 but readers should not hold their breath waiting for this version. The current plan is very different, complicated, and will need a new set of requirements. Thus, if you like v2.0 don't wait for v3.0 as you might be disappointed and waiting quite awhile.

     

    My goal in publishing C.A.P.S. v2.0 is the same as it was for the original Pocket Server, <i>"[T]o put together a hardware and software music server solution that I would actually use and the Computer Audiophile readers could actually use. I would do the leg work, test & listen to everything, and provide the information for CA readers to put together the exact same music server."</i>

     

    Readers unfamiliar with history behind these servers are likely asking why the name Pocket Server? Here is a brief explanation copied from a comment response to version 1.0. <i>"The title does not reference the literal size of the music server. The name Pocket Server is no less accurate than the name Compact Car…Along the way this server was named the Pocket Server by a colleague who was very surprise at its small size when I pulled it out of my carry-on luggage. The server is a bit larger today than it was at that time but the name hasn't changed. This colleague named the server because it was so small not because it actually fits into a pocket. I elected to keep the name, going with the spirit of the name not the letter of the name."</i>

     

    Many CA readers realize standard off-the-shelf computers don't make the best high-end audio music servers. Sure a regular Dell built with nothing but price in mind, with commodity parts and software from any company willing to fork over enough cash, can work as a music server. Such a computer is usually good as a proof of concept machine but literally nothing else that has to do with high-end audio. Don't believe me? Try it and report back in the comments section below. The prevalence of USB DACs in high-end audio has made the need for a quality computer even greater. A quick glance at most computers built today usually reveals a few internal USB hubs to which devices like IR receivers, Bluetooth controllers, keyboards, trackpads, memory card readers, and built-in cameras are all attached. Most users have no clue computer are built this way. Computer audiophiles frequently avoid using external USB hubs like the plague. Little do they know they're using internal USB hubs for their USB DACs. Evidence of one problem related to this can be found by using a USB DAC with a pre unibody MacBook Pro. If the DAC is not connected to the correct USB port the listener will experience audio drop-outs. The trouble stems from several internal devices sharing the same USB bus, namely the keyboard in this situation. In layman's terms there are too many cars on the highway. The audio car should be in the dedicated high occupancy vehicle lane cruising by itself. In reality this is rarely the case.

     

    Throughout the history of consumer electronics the massive mainstream consumer base selects a technology because of its convenience. The niche high-end audio industry perfects this frequently less than desirable technology. Think optical S/PDIF - TosLink. Audiophiles are always striving to improv technology whether it be turntables, CD players, or music servers. The C.A.P.S. v2.0 design is no exception. This is a USB based design that's unlike almost every other music server. C.A.P.S. v2.0 addresses potential USB issues by providing the USB audio data its own autobahn in addition to other leading edge customizations. The performance and sonic quality of Pocket Server 2.0 has truly surprised me. I believe the Computer Audiophile Pocket Server version 2.0 is better than version 1.0 in every respect. Yes, that unequivocally means sound quality. Period.

     

     

     

    <font size="4"><b>Requirements</b></font>

     

    The requirements for version 2.0 are identical to the original Pocket Server. The requirements are both objective and subjective. When necessary I'll do my best to explain how or why my component selections meet these criteria.

     

    <ol>

    <li>Absolutely silent.</li>

    <li>Capable of great sound.</li>

    <li>Great looking.</li>

    <li>No moving parts.</li>

    <li>Fairly inexpensive.</li>

    <li>No legacy components.</li>

    <li>Easy to operate.

    <ol>

    <li>Directly or</li>

    <li>Remotely</li>

    </ol>

    </li>

    <li>Easy to assemble / install

    <ol>

    <li>Assembly / installation by one's self or</li>

    <li>Assembly / installation by local computer shop, son, daughter, neighbor, or friend.</li>

    </ol>

    </li>

    <li>Small size.</li>

    <li>Low power consumption.</li>

    <li>Low heat.</li>

    <li>Accept an add-in card for audio or additional capabilities. Hardware & Software must accept appropriate add-in cards.</li>

    <li>Play 16/44.1, 24/44.1, 24/88.2, 24/96, 24/176.4, and 24/192 all bit perfect.</li>

    </ol>

     

     

     

    <font size="4"><b>Hardware</b></font>

     

    <b>Motherboard</b>

    The main component of every computer is the motherboard. Selecting the right one is the toughest part of designing a server. It's very easy to go overboard with features and wind up with a board that requires so much cooling it sounds like the Space Shuttle. On the the end of the continuum are the boards without any features. These low power featureless boards are interesting but not for a C.A.P.S. design. My motherboard selection for C.A.P.S. v2.0 is the $167 Jetway NF96FL-525-LF. One thing to note about this board is its large heat sink. There is no way to use a full height PCI card, even with a riser, without hitting the heat sink. The main features of this board are a dual core 1.8 GHz Intel Atom D525 fanless processor, capacity for four GB of RAM, Integrated graphics, PCI slot for expansion, an eSATA port, and built-in DC 12-volt power. The dual core 64-bit Atom processor is a major improvement over the original server design. C.A.P.S. v1 was very close to maxing its slower single core 32-bit Atom processor. Like the previous design this processor requires no fan to assist in dispersing heat and satisfies the no moving parts, absolutely silent, low power, and low heat criteria. The other critical component for a silent fanless design is built-in DC power. This enables use of a small external power supply that connects to the rear of the server. Finding a "regular" fanless power supply is not impossible but can severely limit one's case options due to size and heat dissipation. The Jetway's support of 4Gb of memory is another major improvement. Mainstream operating systems and applications continue to take "advantage" of more memory every release. The eSATA port on this motherboard was one of the features that elevated this board over all others. I realize not every computer audiophile has or wants a Network Attached Storage (NAS) device. These users require direct attached storage. It has been my experience that the speed of eSATA disks is a great benefit to music servers. The annoyance of waiting for an external hard drive, even if it's only a second or two, can drive users nuts over time. Using eSATA this annoyance should be reduced considerably. The remaining feature that is imperative to the C.A.P.S. v2.0 design is the PCI expansion slot. The PCI slot may seem like old technology when compared to new blazing fast PCI-express slots. However, many PCI-express cards such as the Lynx AES16e are actually bridged PCI cards made to work in PCI-express slots. The advantage of PCI-express may be moot for most music servers. Plus, C.A.P.S. v2 requires a PCI slot for its superior USB implementation discussed elsewhere.

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/jet-side-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-jet"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/jet-side-thumb.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/jet-top-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-jet"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/jet-top-thumb.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/jet-acc-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-jet"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/jet-acc-thumb.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1739.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-jet"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1739.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1745.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-jet"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1745.jpg"></a></center>

     

     

     

    <b>Ancillary Components</b>

    The remaining ancillary components aren't as exciting but required nonetheless. The <b>memory</b> used for version 2.0 is 2x2GB (4Gb total) modules of DDR2 667 from Transcend. The motherboard front side bus runs at 667 as well. The fact that this memory is standard size as opposed to "laptop" size memory is a plus. It should be easier to find other options and cost less than the smaller modules. There were a few options when selecting the <b>power supply</b> for this C.A.P.S. server. I ruled out using a linear supply for many reasons such as cost, size, complexity, scarcity, and logicality given the standard onboard switching power supplies. The three main PSU options were either 60, 80, or 102 Watts. This server is not power hungry so I followed the less is more path by selecting the Casetronic PW-12V5A-L5 60w supply. The <b>solid state drive</b> selected for version 2.0 will probably surprise many readers. I usually select OCZ drives as they are my standard go-to SSDs. This time I selected the very inexpensive $100 64GB Micro Center brand drive. The Micro Center drives are manufactured by ADATA using the SandForce 1222 Controller. I've used this very good performing drive over the last few months without any issues.

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/ram-side-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-ancillary"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/ram-side-thumb.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/ram-angle-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-ancillary"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/ram-angle-thumb.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/psu-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-ancillary"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/psu-thumb.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/psu-cord-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-ancillary"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/psu-cord-thumb.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/ssd-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-ancillary"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/ssd-thumb.jpg"></a></center>

     

    The one piece of C.A.P.S. v2.0 that remains unchanged from v1.0 is the $320 Origen<sup>ae</sup> M10 <b>computer case</b>. I simply haven't found a better case for the job that meets all the requirements. The M10 is great looking, small, and is compatible with PCI add-in cards. There are literally hundreds of computer cases available that could have been used for this design. Unfortunately almost all of them are hideous looking compared to the M10. The Origen<sup>ae</sup> M10 has form and function.

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot1.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-M10"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot1-s.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot2.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-M10"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot2-s.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot3.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-M10"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot3-s.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot4.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-M10"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot4-s.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot5.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-M10"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_shot5-s.jpg"></a></center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/M10_main.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-M10"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/M10_main-s.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_strip.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-M10"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0208/m10_strip-s.jpg"></a></center>

     

     

     

    <b>Audiophile Add-ins</b>

    The next two pieces of the C.A.P.S. v2.0 puzzle will never be found in an off-the-shelf Dell, HP, Apple, etc. The <b>SOtM tX-USB</b> and <b>SOtM In-Line SATA Power Noise Filter</b> are as far removed from standard commodity computer hardware as it gets. The inline SATA noise filter connects directly to a hard drive whether it's solid state or standard spinning disk. Regular SATA data and SATA power cables are then connected to the filter. No special cables required. The installation could not be simpler. The SOtM filter has individual 12V, 5V, and 3.3V RF noise filters in addition to ripple noise filters. I was skeptical at first but after seeing objective measurements detailing the positive effect this filter has on a computer system and placing this filter in the new C.A.P.S. server I'm sold. Add to cart for all my servers. The SOtM tX-USB is a half height PCI to USB card that fits perfectly in the Origen<sup>ae</sup> M10 case as it's delivered with both short and long PCI trim plates. The design of the SOtM tX-USB is an all-out-assault on PCI to USB cards. The tX-USB has its own power line noise filter, individual ultra low noise regulators to power up to two attached USB devices, onboard ultra low jitter clock, onboard PCI host controller, and separate power connector. This enables the card to be powered by an external linear or battery PSU. Many computer audiophiles like to experiment with cutting the power leg from USB cables or special ordering cables without the power leg. The tX-USB has an easily accessed manual switch, next to the USB ports on the card, that enables/disables sending power over the USB cable. Users will have to check their DACs to determine if USB power is required. Some USB DACs require USB power even if the DAC itself is powered by a separate supply. The tX-USB is 100% compliant with USB 2.0 Hi-Speed and all prior USB specifications and speeds.

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/sata-filter-diag-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm-diag"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/sata-filter-diag-thumb.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/tx-usb-diag-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm-diag"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/tx-usb-diag-thumb.jpg"></a></center>

     

    Low quantity high quality components are never inexpensive. The SOtM components are no exception. The inline SATA noise filter retails for $65 and the tX-USB PCI card rings up at $339. Powering the tX-USB with the Jetway motherboard requires a SATA to LP4 Molex adapter <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/sata-adapter-01-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sata-adapter">(Photo 1)</a> <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/sata-adapter-02-full.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sata-adapter">(Photo 2)</a> as the motherboard ships with two SATA only power connectors. The $6 Nippon Labs SATA 15 Pin Male to Molex 4 pin female adapter should work great with C.A.P.S. v2.0 and the tX-USB. During the build process I was itching to get the server running so I created my own cable using spare parts from my music server graveyard. I recommend simply ordering the inexpensive adapter. Much easier and better looking. As a side note, Linux users will be happy to learn the tX-USB PCI card supports Hi-Speed USB 2.0 devices when used with the correct kernel.

     

    The most likely question CA readers are asking themselves as they read this article is, "How does it sound?" I unequivocally state the SOtM products improved the sound quality of my system when placed into the C.A.P.S. v2.0 server. In fact I was so interested to hear if these products made a difference I placed the tX-USB in the server then connected a <a href="http://www.usbdacs.com">Wavelength Audio</a><a href="http://www.usbdacs.com"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> WaveLink converter to a <u>main motherboard USB port</u> instead of the tX-USB. Old habits are hard to break. I was sorely disappointed as I heard absolutely no change with only the tX-USB installed and my USB converter to the main board. After a couple tracks I mentally retraced my steps and realized my error. Like any wise Golfer I gave myself a mulligan. With the WaveLink connected to the tX-USB (power enabled as required by WaveLink) I listened to the same tracks that I had played using the previous misconfiguration. I was pleasantly surprised to hear such a nice difference. I understand what has gone into engineering the SOtM components but I also understand far better how computers operate. How can there be a sonic difference? USB is USB isn't it? Bit transparent is bit transparent isn't it? Unfortunately there's much more to computer audio than meets the eye or the ear. While working on C.A.P.S. v2.0 a CA reader posted the following link to a <a href="http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/pcaudio/messages/9/90278.html">discussion on Audio Asylum</a><a href="http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/pcaudio/messages/9/90278.html"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>. The discussion details some of the problems associated with USB audio and the difficulties in addressing the issues. A phrase that comes to mind after reading such informative discussions is, "The more you know, the more you know you don't know."

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1384.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1384.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1385.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1385.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1765.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1765.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1755.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1755.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1756.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1756.jpg"></a></center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1760.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1760.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1759.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1759.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1766.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1766.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1771.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1771.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/full/IMG_1777.JPG" class="thickbox" rel="C.A.P.S-v2-sotm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/minick-design/thumb/IMG_1777.jpg"></a></center>

     

     

     

    <b>Optional Add-ins</b>

    FireWire DAC users are also in luck with C.A.P.S. v2.0. The PCI USB card can be excluded from the design by substituting an $8 SYBA SD-VIA-FW1E1H <b>PCI FireWire card</b>. This card works perfect with the Weiss Engineering DAC202. The total savings is $331.

    <a href="http://www.sybausa.com/productInfo.php?iid=458">Manufacturer Link</a><a href="http://www.sybausa.com/productInfo.php?iid=458"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815124034&cm_re=fw1e1h-_-15-124-034-_-Product">Newegg Product Page</a><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815124034&cm_re=fw1e1h-_-15-124-034-_-Product"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>

     

    I did not include an <b>internal ROM drive</b> in Pocket Server version 2.0. If needed one can use an external drive or a $90 Panasonic SATA Slim drive or a $169 Sony Optiarc Blu-ray drive. Many slot loading drives feature drive eject buttons that are not compatible with the Origen<sup>ae</sup> case. Please look closely before purchasing another drive. A $5 mini SATA cable is likely required for the slot loading optical drives.

    <a href="http://www.shop.perfecthometheater.com/DVD-Super-MULTI-Drive-UJ875A.htm">Panasonic SATA Slim drive</a><a href="http://www.shop.perfecthometheater.com/DVD-Super-MULTI-Drive-UJ875A.htm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.shop.perfecthometheater.com/BD-MULTI-Drive-BC-5600S.htm">Sony Optiarc Blu-ray drive</a><a href="http://www.shop.perfecthometheater.com/BD-MULTI-Drive-BC-5600S.htm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.shop.perfecthometheater.com/Mini-SATA-Cable-for-slot-ODDs-Mini-SATA.htm">Mini SATA Cable</a><a href="http://www.shop.perfecthometheater.com/Mini-SATA-Cable-for-slot-ODDs-Mini-SATA.htm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>

     

     

     

    <font size="4"><b>Software</b></font>

     

    <b>Operating System</b>

    During the design of the original Pocket Server I researched and tested a few different operating systems including Windows 7 and Voyage Linux. I've closely followed Voyage's development since that time and noted the rise of other Linux based servers aimed at audiophiles. Given the C.A.P.S. v2.0 requirements and the fact that companies such as <a href="http://www.sonore.us/">Simple Design</a><a href="http://www.sonore.us/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> can design and build a better Linux system than I ever could I elected to bypass Linux for the Pocket Server design once more time. Linux is great but like everything in life it has an appropriate time and place. Linux is not the right fit for the C.A.P.S. v2.0 design.

     

    <img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0224/win-7-packaging-JRMC14.png" style="padding: 5pt 10pt 7pt 5pt;" align="left">I selected Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64-bit as the version 2.0 operating system. Most of the same reasons used for the v1.0 design hold true for v2.0. Windows 7 meets all the software based requirements for a Pocket Server. Quoting the C.A.P.S. v1.0 article, Windows 7, <i>"s capable of great sound, [is] a current OS, easy to operate and install, works with more hardware than any other OS, and is capable of bit perfect playback at all required sample rates when configured properly."</i> CA readers familiar with the original design will likely wonder why I selected the 64-bit version when previously I saw no benefit to a 64-bit OS. The main reason I went with the 64-bit OS is I wanted the new C.A.P.S. design to be forward "thinking" for lack of a better term. It's clear the personal computer industry is moving toward 64-bit hardware and 64-bit operating systems. In fact most hardware has supported a 64-bit architecture for years. The C.A.P.S. v2.0 hardware is no exception, it fully supports 64-bit software.

     

    <b>Playback / Library Management Application</b>

    <a href="http://www.jriver.com">J River Media Center 16</a><a href="http://www.jriver.com"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> is by far the best choice for the playback application running on C.A.P.S. v2.0. JRMC has the best mix of file format support, good graphical user interface, database functionality, customization, and most importantly audio output modes such as WASAPI - Event Style, WASAPI, Kernel Streaming, and ASIO. In addition to a great application J River has very good support for the computer audiophile community. I recently had the opportunity to visit the guys at J River, once again, and test the new $FREE Android remote control app <a href="http://wiki.jriver.com/index.php/Gizmo">Gizmo</a><a href="http://wiki.jriver.com/index.php/Gizmo"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>. Readers with Android devices would be remiss not to give Gizmo a shot. I really like the functionality of the app and its ease of use. Currently iPhone users can control JRMC via a plain web interface or use an app such as <a href="http://www.bitremote.com/">BitRemote ($10)</a><a href="http://www.bitremote.com/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>.

     

    After everything was installed and configured I began paring down the Windows operating system including applications and services. I uninstalled nearly all of the Windows "Features" including Games, Indexing, Search, Printing, etc. Within the Windows System Properties - Performance Options I selected "Adjust for best performance". this disables all the animations and graphically intense pieces of the operating system. I also disabled System Restore, Windows Defender, Windows Firewall, and Windows Update. Obviously there is no anti-virus software on the C.A.P.S server. I also removed everything from the startup folder and Registry startup entries via MSCONFIG. As a precautionary measure I installed the Google Chrome Internet browser for the rare times I need to find album art online. This browser appears more secure than many of the Microsoft Internet Explorer versions.

     

    A default Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit installation has over 140 services some of which run in the background whether or not they are required by the user. The C.A.P.S v2.0 server is currently running 33 of 144 possible services. It's certainly possible to stop or disable more of the remaining 33 services. It has been my experience that these remaining services provide a good mix of stability and software usability. I've included a list of services, status, and startup type in the document below.

     

    · <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/C.A.P.S.v2-Services.pdf">C.A.P.S. v2 Services PDF</a><a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/C.A.P.S.v2-Services.pdf"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>

     

     

     

    <font size="4"><b>Comparison C.A.P.S. Version 1.0 and 2.0</b></font>

     

    Comparing the original Pocket Server to version 2.0 reveals this new design as the clear winner. Not only is v2.0 less expensive it offers better performance and sound quality. The motherboard, CPU, and RAM received a needed upgrade that leaves v1.0 in the dust without requiring a massive cooling apparatus or spinning fans. The most critical improvement to v2.0 is the replacement of the Lynx AES16 with the SOtM tX-USB card. This card in combination with many of the new USB DACs should make CA readers very happy. Running a USB DAC from a C.A.P.S v1.0 built-in USB port simply doesn't measure up. C.A.P.S. v2.0 is also a great system for FireWire users who will save $339 off the USB server price.

     

    After publishing the original Pocket Server design a few readers asked why not simply purchase a Mac Mini for $699 and call it a day? A Mac Mini doesn't meet the stated requirements of the C.A.P.S. design. Absolute Silence, no moving parts, and the ability to use an add-in card for expansion are not possible with a Mac Mini. Plus, the C.A.P.S server has increased computer audiophiles' engagement in this wonderful hobby through many user tweaks and customizations simply unavailable under OS X and a Mac Mini. Some people like to get more involved in the server part of the system while other would rather set it and forget it by using a Mac Mini. There's no right or wrong here. Both approaches have nothing to do with one's enjoyment of music or one's credibility as a music loving audiophile. It's even more likely that many CA readers enjoy both types of systems. I currently enjoy a highly tweaked C.A.P.S. v2.0 server and at the same time a Mac server, a Linux server, and hopefully soon a <a href="http://www.meridian-audio.com/sooloos/">Meridian-Sooloos</a><a href="http://www.meridian-audio.com/sooloos/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> server. This is all about furthering one's enjoyment of great music and interest in high-end audio. Nobody should care how it's done.

     

     

     

    <font size="4"><b>Wrap-Up</b></font>

     

    <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/cash-logo-black.png" class="thickbox" rel="cash"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/cash-logo-black-thumb.jpg" style="padding: 2pt 5pt 2pt 2pt;" align="left" alt="CASH-List"></a>There you have it the Computer Audiophile Pocket Server version 2.0. I sincerely hope this server design accomplishes my goal of being a hardware and software solution everyone can and will use. I'll never make a penny from this design and I'm not looking to publish a design that competes with an existing manufacturer. This design is first and foremost for all the Computer Audiophile readers who've shown such dedication to our terrific hobby and encouraged me to release an updated C.A.P.S. server. I thought about readers' likes, dislikes, and requirements throughout the entire design process. That said I didn't compromise any part of the design by sinking to the lowest common denominator. That's simply not what Computer Audiophile is about. I'm very excited to read user comments about the design, good and bad, and to see users start building their own v2.0 servers. It really has been my pleasure to design, build, and reveal the new Computer Audiophile Pocket Server version 2.0.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    <i>The Computer Audiophile Pocket Server v2.0 piece by piece</i>

     

    <ul>

    <li><b>Motherboard</b>: <a href="http://www.jetway.com.tw/jw/ipcboard_view.asp?productid=716&proname=NF96FL-510-LF%20/%20NF96FL-525-LF">Jetway NF96FL-525-LF ($167)</a><a href="http://www.jetway.com.tw/jw/ipcboard_view.asp?productid=716&proname=NF96FL-510-LF%20/%20NF96FL-525-LF"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/Manual-G03-NF96-F-V6.0.pdf">Manual (PDF)</a><a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/Manual-G03-NF96-F-V6.0.pdf"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.logicsupply.com/products/nf96fl_525">Logic Supply Product Page</a><a href="http://www.logicsupply.com/products/nf96fl_525"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>Memory</b>: <a href="http://www.transcendusa.com/Products/MemList.asp?axn=goSearch&srhMemWay=STD&L0No=Transcend&L2No=37&L4No=66&LangNo=0&Func1No=1&Func2No=12">Transcend DDR2 667 Memory 2GBx2 ($53 x 2 Modules = $106)</a><a href="http://www.transcendusa.com/Products/MemList.asp?axn=goSearch&srhMemWay=STD&L0No=Transcend&L2No=37&L4No=66&LangNo=0&Func1No=1&Func2No=12"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/RAM-Datasheet-TS256MLQ64V6U_2980_S.pdf">Datasheet</a><a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/RAM-Datasheet-TS256MLQ64V6U_2980_S.pdf"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.logicsupply.com/products/256mlq64v6u">Logic Supply Product Page</a><a href="http://www.logicsupply.com/products/256mlq64v6u"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>Solid State Drive</b>: <a href="http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0351760">Microcenter Brand 64GB SATA II 3.0Gb/s 2.5" G2 Series</a><a href="http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0351760"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>Power Adapter</b>: <a href="http://www.casetronic.com/product_d.php?dtype=0&id=0000000040#DETAIL">Casetronic PW-12V5A-L5 DC 12V, 60W Level 5 ($23.50)</a><a href="http://www.casetronic.com/product_d.php?dtype=0&id=0000000040#DETAIL"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.logicsupply.com/products/pw_12v5a_l5">Logic Supply Page</a><a href="http://www.logicsupply.com/products/pw_12v5a_l5"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>Computer Case</b>: <a href="http://www.origenae.co.kr/">Origen<sup>ae</sup> M10 ($320)</a><a href="http://www.origenae.co.kr/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.shop.perfecthometheater.com/OrigenAE-chassis-and-amplifiers_c30.htm;jsessionid=0E147D8574CC026D36EFCD950A5C0A71.qscstrfrnt04">Product Purchase Page</a><a href="http://www.shop.perfecthometheater.com/OrigenAE-chassis-and-amplifiers_c30.htm;jsessionid=0E147D8574CC026D36EFCD950A5C0A71.qscstrfrnt04"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/M10_User_guide_1.0911_En.pdf">User Guide (PDF)</a><a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/M10_User_guide_1.0911_En.pdf"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/m10-brochure.pdf">Brochure (PDF)</a><a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/m10-brochure.pdf"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>PCI to USB Card</b>: <a href="http://sotm-audio.com/sotm/products/tX-USB.htm">SOtM tX-USB ($339)</a><a href="http://sotm-audio.com/sotm/products/tX-USB.htm"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.sotm.sonore.us/">Purchase Page</a><a href="http://www.sotm.sonore.us/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/tX-USB-Operating-Instructions-Rev1.0.pdf">Operating Instructions (PDF)</a><a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0623/tX-USB-Operating-Instructions-Rev1.0.pdf"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>SATA Power Filter</b>: <a href="http://www.sotm.sonore.us/">SOtM In-Line SATA Power Noise Filter ($65) / Product Purchase Page</a><a href="http://www.sotm.sonore.us/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>Internal Power Adapter</b>: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812816038">Nippon Labs SATA to Molex Power Adapter SATA - SATA 15 Pin Male to Molex 4 pin female ($6)</a><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812816038"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>Operating System</b>: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/">Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64-bit ($185)</a><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116997&cm_re=windows_7-_-32-116-997-_-Product">Newegg Product Page</a><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116997&cm_re=windows_7-_-32-116-997-_-Product"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>Playback Application</b>: <a href="http://www.jriver.com/">J River Media Center 16 ($50)</a><a href="http://www.jriver.com/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    <li><b>(<i>Optional</i>) PCI FireWire Card</b>: <a href="http://www.sybausa.com/productInfo.php?iid=458">SYBA SD-VIA-FW1E1H ($8)</a><a href="http://www.sybausa.com/productInfo.php?iid=458"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/FireWire-SD-VIA-FW1E1H-Manual.jpg">User Manual (JPG)</a><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0623/FireWire-SD-VIA-FW1E1H-Manual.jpg"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> | <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815124034&cm_re=fw1e1h-_-15-124-034-_-Product">Newegg Product Page</a><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815124034&cm_re=fw1e1h-_-15-124-034-_-Product"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a></li>

    </ul>

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Sounds interesting, but don't you have to use fans in a full size board?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for your insights, Antipode_Audio. <br />

    <br />

    Wondering whether you actually tried building the C.A.P.S. server or another mini-itx mobo with an external AC supply and the SoTM USB card?<br />

    <br />

    Apart from the greater memory capacity of the full-sized rig, what would you guess accounts for the better transparency you are hearing? Raw CPU power? I would have thought that the full-sized board with internal power supply would suffer a greater degree of noise on the supply busses and ground plane. Beyond that, there's the question of the fan noise as machinehead notes.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A few questions there - will try to be brief, please don't mistake it for rudeness.<br />

    <br />

    No moving parts at all. Not sure how you got to assuming I use fans. On the contrary I suspect there are more reasons to need a fan in a small form factor machine. I have Micro-ATX machines that have been running 24/7 for years without any heat issues or related failures.<br />

    <br />

    Yes, I have made Mini-ITX servers with external PSUs, 4 of them if I recall, and suspect their inferior sound came from a variety of factors, maybe less powerful chips on-board, less RAM and poorer architecture of the CPUs, though that is all just guesswork. <br />

    <br />

    I felt the Mobile CPU types were really quite poor but how do you know it isn't the motherboards?<br />

    <br />

    On the CPU front it is quite notable how much faster, transparent and coherent the sound becomes using an i5-2390T (or similar of the latest low-power dissipation Sandy Bridges) than say an E7500. But the E7500 produces a nicely rounded and warm sound if you like that kind of thing (again, how do you know it isn't the motherboard).<br />

    <br />

    I have preferred DDR3 over DDR2 RAM as well. <br />

    <br />

    I have made my own filters for the disk feeds and like them but have some SoTM filters coming, to see if they are any better. <br />

    <br />

    My confidence in USB is low enough I haven't invested in trying the SoTM USB card, and I have disposed of all but one USB DAC for the reasons stated. Wasn't async USB a disappointment? <br />

    <br />

    If I had a conventional DAC I wanted to use, then I would use (and have used) an Apogee Rosetta 200 to interface via firewire to the computer and then SPDIF (or AES if that is your poison, it isn't mine) to the DAC. I have demo'd that interface versus a variety of USB interfaces, using relatively inexpensive firewire cables versus very expensive USB cables, both feeding a DCS Elgar and the USB always sounds indistinct (opposite of having solidity) and muddled by comparison. I can't help feeling the SoTM USB card would just be another few hundred down the drain, as the highly touted async USB interfaces all were. But maybe now you have challenged me on that point I will have to do it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wasn't assuming it had a fan, it was a serious question, can you build an i5 board without a fan.<br />

    <br />

    Thanks for any info.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Some boxes will be better than others. When using fans the holes in the case are strategically placed so that air is forced through a particular route, but without fans you rely on convection. So the best fanless cases will have a lot of ventillation and preferably holes at top and bottom rather than on the sides. <br />

    <br />

    The CPU cooler I tend to use most is the Scythe Rasetsu with the fan removed. The fanless Rasetsu has proved to be sufficient for any E7500 (or similar) CPU build.<br />

    <br />

    You are correct that the first gen of Sandy Bridges, and most of the later ones will not be cooled sufficiently with the fanless Rasetsu. Even the 65W Max TDP ones are too hard. But recently there have been a few interesting CPUs with low TDPs such as the (more an i3 really) i5-2390T with a TDP of just 35W. I have made four servers using these and even in poorly ventillated cases like the H6 there are no heat problems.<br />

    <br />

    I will be making one soon with an i5-2500T which has a Max TDP of 45W. I am sometimes asked why not just under-clock some other chip rather than use the low TDP chips, and the answer is I tried and found I still had some heat problems from time to time going that way.<br />

    <br />

    As regards the Mini-ITX boards, I have found they are great for a Linux music server, but for some reason not so good for Win 7 or Hackintosh. I suspect that this means I just need to wait till they develop a bit further. For example, I imagine one that can handle 8GB of RAM may change my mind.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I also was unable to boot my computer with the Sonore PSU. Of course, the SMPS worked fine. I took the SOTM HD filter out, and it booted just fine with the Sonore PSU. <br />

    <br />

    Necessity is the mother of invention. I noticed I had a couple of AQVOX 5v LPSUs laying around. So, I successfully powered the boot drive with an AQVOX 5v LPSU with the SOTM HD filter attached. Just for the fun of it, I then decided to power the 2nd hard drive with another AQVOX 5v LPSU. Everything sounds great. I am very happy to be back using Jriver.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm looking for a good linear PSU for my CAPS V2. I possibly thought to buy the Sonore one but it seems that it is not compliant with the CAPS V2...<br />

    <br />

    Any advise of an high quality PSU that works with the CAPS V2? Thank you!<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have read this thread and i must say it is of great interest to me.A great concept and one that appears to be the answer to so many hifi servers that don't quite cut the mustard.<br />

    CAPS V2 i believe is really addressing the issues that so many servers from leading manufacturers gloss over.i.e lowest power usage,minimal processing from OS,proper USB filtering etc.<br />

    I would however like to see the next chapter V3 perhaps? This could be something that i would like to build or maybe even order ready made(depends how complex)Can we get some idea of when this might happen? As much as i like the V2 i think there is room for further development.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What I would like to see, and this is reflected in other peoples' comments is the video card expansion. I know that may mean a different case, but Theater View is just done too well... <br />

    <br />

    The NVidia NVS 300 might be a candidate. 17.5 watts, passively heat-sink cooled, supports 1900X1200 for 1:1 output to HighDef TV, and the higher 2560X1600 for monitors. <br />

    <br />

    It is really tiny and takes up almost no room - not long and skinny with integrated fan like lots of graphics cards. Might even stick into current chassis? It also has power management - it will cool off when not in use quite a bit.<br />

    <br />

    This is a descendant of NVIDIA's laptop graphics cards, so the power management stuff is real.<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    EDIT: Ah, just poked a bit deeper. So, there is one PCI slot, and it is using the SOTM, which could be moved offboard (although I much prefer the PCI onboard solution, much cleaner) but still the NVIDIA card expects PCIE 1X or 16X, not PCI.<br />

    <br />

    There is a way to do this however, just like with v2 its a matter of balancing all of the requirements, certainly a board exists for a small case that is atom-oriented that can take a small graphics card such as the NVIDIA NVS 300.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This looks pretty cool, though it obviously doesn't have the internal PCI slot for the SOTM. You'd have to use the external SOTM device.<br />

    <br />

    http://usa.asus.com/Eee/EeeBox_PC/EeeBox_PC_EB1021/<br />

    <br />

    and this is the SSD upgrade:<br />

    <br />

    http://www.crucial.com/store/mpartspecs.aspx?mtbpoid=1357CC13A5CA7304<br />

    <br />

    This also looks pretty cool:<br />

    <br />

    http://us.shuttle.com/X350V2.aspx<br />

    <br />

    You can configure it with NVIDIA ION and SSD...<br />

    <br />

    Do we know exactly how much difference there is in external SOTM box vs PCI?<br />

    <br />

    These look very attractive to me in terms of simplicity...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just to note: the SOTM external box and pci card aren't the same device: the card is designed for clean electrical/sonic hookup of any USB audio device, and the box is a USB>SPDIF converter, albeit with some quality regulators built in.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I guess I think of the external box as the 2nd best way - if you have a noisy computer environment and can't do anything inside the computer the box is the next best way to get asynch usb that is as cleaned as is possible, and if you do a short 3 or even 6 foot toslink run after the box you'll get total electrical isolation from the computer system and the DAC. I've not thought of it as a usb-spdif converter although obviously it does that - I guess because of their work on noise regulation on their offerings inside the computer I think of it as a cleaner of sorts...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All the ones I've seen use heat pipes and heat sinks, which makes them much more complicated and expensive that a CAPS 2 build. But it can be done. See http://endpcnoise.com for one of several vendors of such devices.<br />

    <br />

    I assume that's part of the reason Chris used the dual core Atom board for his design - leads to a simpler and cheaper PC.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Shuttle model indicated above is dual-core atom, just like CAPS v2. Just doesn't have a pci slot for the SOTM card...<br />

    <br />

    And it is only $726 with 4 GB RAM, SSD (128 - assuming NAS for music storage) and ION NVidia graphics chip/card. Because of that ION chip/card you can output 1080p to your flatscreen. And it has the DVD drive.<br />

    <br />

    They do make custom pieces - we could bug them to make it with a larger case and place for a single PCI card :)...<br />

    <br />

    Oh, and I slightly indicated the wrong Asus model, which is also dual-atom based (click on the link - this thing is super-tiny!). This is the right link here - same box, different internals, also has NVidia ION graphics controller like the Shuttle.<br />

    <br />

    http://usa.asus.com/Eee/EeeBox_PC/EeeBox_PC_EB1012P/<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    I chose both of these for their dual-core Atom and Nvidia Ion combo.<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here is a great ITX motherboard with Nvidia Ion2 graphics, this is a fanless board, and has the same dual-core atom processors.<br />

    <br />

    Of course, it has the modern PCIe x4 slot, not PCI, but just saying that this is the kind of board I think we should be heading towards.<br />

    <br />

    SOTM really has to get out a PCIe x1 or PCIe x2 slot or whatever it needs - that would make it compatible with all new computers. Of course this has been mentioned on many threads hundreds of times.....<br />

    <br />

    (For those that don't know if it were a PCIe x1 or x2 card, it would fit into any slot of that size or larger, for PCIe a x1 card can fit into any PCIe slot. Magic.)<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Anyhow, here is the board:<br />

    <br />

    http://www.mini-itx.com/store/~AT5IONT-I <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    (You know, another interesting thing here is that it has optical out already... It would be interesting to hear this via optical out into an asynch via SPDIF optical DAC... I think that should do through 24/96 just fine)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really don't understand how improved video chipset or hotter/faster CPU is going to make the CAPS 2.0 sound better. I can imagine how it may make it sound worse. If you are looking for the ultimate HTPC, that's one thing. Chris' CAPS 2.0 is about building an elite dedicated music server over USB. Btw, I have tried various HTPC builds with the hope that I could get ultimate video and audio performance and ended up with neither.<br />

    <br />

    All I know is that the CAPS 2.0, with the modest psu upgrades I am using right now, absolutely smokes my MBP 2011 with choice of playback software over USB.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, reading through the posts, I find various posters asking for comparisons of the sound of CAPS V2 compared to a Mac. Yet I don't see any responses (or else I managed to miss them). Surely you must have some thoughts on the subject, given that you are very clear on the sonic value of your design vis-a-vis its Windows-based predecessors and alternatives.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am running windows 7 32 bit and Jriver in media server mode. I am using 32 bit in anticipation for merging technology's "emotion."

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would really love to see a player software comparisons of these on the same hardware, especially the CAPS.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't disagree with anything anyone is saying. <br />

    <br />

    But somehow, taking CAPS v2 and adding Ion2 capability - getting Hulu or purchased VOD from Amazon or Apple to play with little or no shaking or stuttering would be awesome.<br />

    <br />

    I'm not sure, but if the SOTM card came out for PCIe 1x came out, then the ASUS board indicated above should do that just great.<br />

    <br />

    Not looking to game on it, or do anything with high frame rates or anything. Just add Ion2 to what is there.<br />

    <br />

    What is annoying is that looking at a large number of ITX boards, they seem to either have a PCI slot or Ion2, I've found plenty of one or the other - all dual-core Atom but none with both, as PCI is so old and Ion2 so new.<br />

    <br />

    Compared to the board Chris chose - there is nothing special about his board in itself for audio - it isn't 'better' for audio than these other ITX atom dual-core based boards, it just is the one that fit the criteria he was looking for in terms of functionality - primarily size (ITX), no fan, dual core Atom, and has a PCI slot. I've seen two or three other options that also fits that criteria and should sound exactly the same - and some of those have Intel embedded graphics, but they don't put out 1080p, it needs the Ion2 reinforcement to do that. Any of these other ITX boards would sound just the same given the rest of the components being the same.<br />

    <br />

    So, now the thing is to see if we can just add fanless Ion2. <br />

    <br />

    Note as I've had 2 comments on this - there is no change in processor at all (both are 525) between the ASUS and the CAPS2 board. Might be a few more Mhz here or there but very very minor difference if any at all - several are exactly the same processor.<br />

    <br />

    The one thing I'm not sure about is if somehow having no video at all lowers a noise floor or interference or something, not sure, we'd have to test two similar boards with all of the other components being the same.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I haven't found any information on how to control the caps. Do I use a monitor or can I control it via RDC (but that would need wireless or a wired network connection)?<br />

    Can someone please point me to the information. I guess I am overlooking something.<br />

    Thanks a lot.<br />

    Claude

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Has anyone experience using a linear PSU? I read "Dallas Justice" experience with the AQVOX and I know that Mani has someone build him a linear PSU. <br />

    I guess, it will be possible to upgrade later on and just start with the CAPS as build by little green computers?<br />

    Greetings from Berlin<br />

    Claudius<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Can you share approx how much capacity is left on the SSD after installing Windows and the J River app? <br />

    <br />

    I'm thinking about trying a variation on your build using a HDD/Synapse Cache combination (inspired by the S10 review and their approach to avoiding NAS) but not sure a 64GB Synapse Cache SSD would have sufficient space left with the OS/J River software on it to cache music during a regular listening session - or if I'd have to go to a 128GB SSD.<br />

    <br />

    Thanks,<br />

    Mitch

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...