john2in3 Posted August 12, 2011 Share Posted August 12, 2011 Since both mac and windows read exFAT, does it make sense to store the music library as exFAT? exFAT has less overhead than NTFS and is therefore (I have read that) read operations are faster and cleaner. It would seem to be a better choice performance wise. The only disadvantages it has would not seem to be relevant: - not compatible with old versions of windows or old OSX - not good if you eject the disk while it is writing (only relevant to flash memory cards) - no user account security on a per file basis (which would add overhead and slow it down) - larger cluster size than NTFS (not relevant for our large music files) Seems to be a no brainer, have people looked into this? Link to comment
PeterSt Posted August 12, 2011 Share Posted August 12, 2011 larger cluster size than NTFS (not relevant for our large music files) This is relevant for speed. So, for a music disk under NTFS I always choose the largest cluster size. Whether this is all relevant for SQ ... I guess so. But I never tried it out ... Peter Lush^3-e Lush^2 Blaxius^2.5 Ethernet^3 HDMI^2 XLR^2 XXHighEnd (developer) Phasure NOS1 24/768 Async USB DAC (manufacturer) Phasure Mach III Audio PC with Linear PSU (manufacturer) Orelino & Orelo MKII Speakers (designer/supplier) Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 12, 2011 Share Posted August 12, 2011 Because Macs can't write to an NTFS disk easily I've rules out NTFS as a good format for many things. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now