Zaphf Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 This kind of thing seems to be a problem. http://www.itrax.com/Pages/ArticleDetails.php?aID=32 After this helpful bit of information from new_media I feel a bit burned. If the HDtrack is a rip from a SACD that was just a 24bit pad of a 16bit redbook recording it's not HD. Link to comment
Kevin_O Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 This article is old news and has been discussed. HDtracks rips the DSD (notPCM) file from an SACD and downconverts to 24/176.4 or 24/88.2 Some of the labels in the past used their 24/44.1 files and upconverted them to DSD so they could get more money for an SACD release. They are the ones you should be "burned" about. NOT HDTracks... Besides, Mark has hi-rez files he wants to sell you. Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 "This article is old news and has been discussed." Hi Kevin - That's a sure way to kill a thread. Please state your industry affiliation in this thread and include it in your signature from now on. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Zaphf Posted May 16, 2011 Author Share Posted May 16, 2011 Well, my apologies if that was old news. It looked current as the article was dated today. As for the source's motivations, unless he's making false claims it has no bearing on the content. It speaks to the fact that we're all at the mercy of a purveyor's claims until after we fork over the cash. You're right that the re-issue of the SACD was shady but fail to see how HDtracks is better in this instance. They, after all, are the ones who are reselling what is essentially a CD as HD. Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted May 16, 2011 Share Posted May 16, 2011 Hi Zaphf - Don't be fooled by the date on the iTrax articles. iTrax uses simple code to place today's date on all the articles :~) Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Zaphf Posted May 16, 2011 Author Share Posted May 16, 2011 Yah, figured. After the fact Link to comment
zerung Posted May 17, 2011 Share Posted May 17, 2011 i am a sucker for the Highrez files and have paid a bit and been fooled. I assume in any industry that is starting off, there are bound to be foolish mistakes and cheats. I hope this gets sorted out soon and we don't have these silly advantages being taken. I have to say we in CA are getting wise and seems to have put some traction on this and hopefully help to stop this fully. Qnap NAS (LPS) >UA ETHER REGEN (BG7TBL Master Clock) > Grimm MU1 > Mola Mola Tambaqui /Meridian 808.3> Wavac EC300B >Tannoy Canterbury SE HP Rig ++ >Woo WES/ > Stax SR-009, Audeze LCD2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now