The Computer Audiophile Posted August 6, 2020 Share Posted August 6, 2020 View full article Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 6, 2020 Author Share Posted August 6, 2020 55 minutes ago, AudioDoctor said: That Pre-amp is a beaut! Almost makes me want to buy it based on looks alone. Agree. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 7, 2020 Author Share Posted August 7, 2020 35 minutes ago, AudioDoctor said: @The Computer Audiophile Chris, when will we hear how the RAALs sound on a system made up of these two components? 😉 I seriously thought about it! AudioDoctor 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 7, 2020 Author Share Posted August 7, 2020 1 hour ago, bluesman said: Great to see this! Mac tube preamps have always been among the most natural I've heard. The first truly high end piece I bought new was an MX110 tuner/preamp in 1969. Driving the Dyna Mk III power amps I built and modified to about halfway between stock and an early Audio Research product, the sound was so wonderful that I often had trouble studying (I was a med student at the time). What I never understood was how the early audiophile press could slam McIntosh so hard and so often. If I didn't know better, I'd have assumed there was some reason other than sound quality, build quality, or aesthetics I have an MC275 Mk V and I'll never sell it. I love the sound and the look. Audiophile press can be strange. When things look good they are often placed in the "it can't sound good" camp, as if the two things are mutually exclusive. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now