24/352.8 vs. 16/44.1 - an attempt at a comparison

[Ralf11]

14 hours ago, sandyk said:

 

high res is a waste of time as only younger dogs, bats etc. can hear the differences.

...

 

 

Just a note so we can keep the camps separate...

 

the above is one camp

 

another camp holds that HiRes is of marginal utility because the quality of the mastering is much more important

 

a 3rd camp holds that reproduction of ultrasonic freq.s is of little value as dogs, bats etc. can hear the differences BUT that HiRes - even on the same mastering - allows gentle "euphonic" filters and is thus of some interest

 

 

FWIW, I am likely to found around a fire at camp 3

[Ralf11]

1 hour ago, daverich4 said:

 

In all the time I’ve been here Frank is the only one I have on my ignore list.

 

I tried that for a  while but realized I was missing out on a lot free crazy

[Ralf11]

it was obviously more than renaming

 

you are rather quick to call the stmts. of fact by "many, many" others BS

 

and also quick to claim "it's not worth arguing" when called on your own non-factual stmts.

[Ralf11]

many, many high profile, and  highly qualified members with post counts of >5,000  think somebody is full of it