Popular Post barrows Posted March 3, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted March 3, 2018 Thank you for this article. Now there is a single place which I can point people to who are interested in MQA, which is well researched and backed up with facts and measurements, rather than the techno mumbo jumbo coming from the big magazines and MQA themselves. I always was of the opinion that MQA was a solution in search of a problem (from a music lover/audiophile perspective, perhaps not if you are a record company type). I have no need for it and prefer to have my high resolution audio files unadulterated My biggest fear is that MQA will result in the absence of native high resolution releases of the music I want, of this I am very fearful and it is why I oppose MQA. MikeJazz and Teresa 1 1 SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers. ISOAcoustics Oreas footers. SONORE computer audio | opticalRendu | ultraRendu | microRendu | Signature Rendu SE | Accessories | Software | Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now