Simple MQA poll.

[pkane2001]

19 minutes ago, kumakuma said:

 

New comments are needed to keep a thread near the top of the active threads feed.

 

While I'm not strongly for or against MQA, it appears to me to be a marketing ploy more than any real improvement in streaming audio. I found no real explanation of what it does to improve sound quality, other than a lot of hand-waving and marketing-speak. For this reason, I voted against it.

 

[pkane2001]

1 hour ago, realhifi said:

Just curious what you’re basing that on? 

 

I would reach the same conclusion based on this:

 

1 hour ago, realhifi said:

If Mr. Archimago is passing as an expert on MQA then certainly his credentials, actual name, etc. should be known. 

 

This is an obviously un-objectivist statement. Objective reporting, as in the type practiced by Archimago, does not require reputation or background checks — it’s designed not to rely on opinions or emotions of others. It stands on its own, without resorting to personalities. That’s what objective means. Since you apparently don’t know this, you are not an objectivist.