Stereophile Series on MQA Technology

[shtf]

11 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Whoops. I missed that one. I guess @Indydan's list can now be updated because @Galileo365 is indeed Andy Schaub and he sent me the following email.

 

 

I don't know the guy but this is too funny.  But why?   What could motivate an individual to do this and for what possible gain? 

 

I'm tellin' ya', there's a helluva lot more to MQA here than meets the eye.  And a helluva lot less too. 

 

I can't help but smell record labels.  There's just no way Bob Stuart is the mastermind behind any of this.  It's way too big and I wouldn't doubt bigger than we might imagine because if it's this bad on the surface, imagine what must be going on behind the scenes.   email servers must be overloading every time there's a new post. 

 

Just observe how motivated some of these guys are even after 3.5 years.

[shtf]

1 minute ago, MikeyFresh said:

 

 

I was thinking the same thing, compensation of some kind comes to mind, though if true certainly not money well spent.

 

No doubt.  But B-actors are never compensated much anyway.

 

I've always suspected the record labels were behind MQA or at least since day 2.  Day 1 was reading my first MQA articles in TAS along with Harley's interview with Stuart.