Popular Post hineni Posted January 26, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted January 26, 2018 What I'd like to see from MQA proponents is some acknowledgment that we have to give something up to get whatever MQA offers. They can maintain the trade-offs are worth it, but the denial of any downsides or dangers blows their credibility, IMO. I'd like to see them acknowledge and address: 1) the possible loss of end-user DSP functions such as bass management, room correction and digital equalization, 2) the loss of freedom to choose the digital filter of one's choice for all digital files, 3) the prospect that MQA files may become the ONLY digital format available, even outside the streaming world, and MQA's efforts to extend beyond streaming, and 4) an accurate reporting of the DRM capabilities in MQA (not what people have promised or not promised to do, but the worst case scenario built into MQA). The market will decide if MQA is, on balance, good. But there has to be a balanced presentation of the facts. bogi, Mordikai, Teresa and 7 others 6 4 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now