Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Musical Fidelity V-Link 192 USB to S/PDIF Converter Review

    thumb1.pngListening sessions around Computer Audiophile have been extremely enjoyable lately. The last two DACs reviewed, EMM Labs DAC2X ($15,500) and Chord QBD76HDSD ($8,500), both made the C.A.S.H. List and delivered great sonic performance. Next in line for review is the $399 Musical Fidelity V-Link 192 asynchronous USB to S/PDIF converter. The V-Link 192 doesn't cost nearly as much as the sales tax on the previously reviewed components let alone the retail prices. Fortunately, as computer audiophiles know, really good sound can come at really good prices. The V-Link 192 costs roughly 20% as much as the best USB to S/PDIF converter I've used (BADA Alpha USB) yet it delivers near 90% of the sonic performance. I highly recommend the V-Link 192 for the vast majority of users who don't feel the urge to spend vast amounts of money squeezing the remaining few percentage points of performance from their systems. At $399 the V-Link 192 is a uncomplicated device that plays a critical role and is a tremendous overachiever.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    1_vlink192-front.png

     

     

     

    Top of the V Series

     

    2_vlink192-inputs-silver-cropped.pngThe Musical Fidelity V-Link 192 is the top USB to S/PDIF converter in the V Series. It is completely powered by the USB bus of the connected computer. No wall-wort external power adapters needed or even possible. Using the V-Link 192 is as simple as connecting a standard USB cable on one end and an AES or coaxial cable on the other. There are no settings or switches to mess with on the V-Link 192. Its asynchronous USB input, developed in-house using the XMOS chipset, supports all pertinent PCM sample rates from 44.1 kHz through 192 kHz. The "192" is a Class 2 USB audio device that requires drivers on Windows operating systems but not on newer versions of Linux and OS X. Connected to my MacBook Pro running 10.7.4, the Weiss Engineering MAN301, and the Aurender W10 the V-Link 192 worked flawlessly. On the Windows platform Musical Fidelity uses the very robust Thesycon software and drivers. Simple installation and flawless performance just like Linux and OS X servers.

     

     

     

    Internally the V-Link 192 has improved power supply regulation over the first generation of V Series converters. This power supply feeds the internal clock Musical Fidelity placed next to key components to shorten the signal path. The V-Link 192 has two fairly average fixed oscillators from the Shin Koln Cooperation. One 22.579 MHz for the 44.1 kHz family of sample rates and one 24.576 MHz for the 48 kHz family. As data enters the V-Link 192 it traverses an I2S bus to the S/PDIF converter. According to Musical Fidelity this reduces jitter. After conversion to S/PDIF data flows via transformer coupled galvanically isolated AES/EBU or coaxial S/PDIF outputs to one's DAC of choice. The 30T-2521NL transformers from Yuan Dean Scientific are used for isolation and ground loop prevention, a major issue in many audio systems, although the 30T-2521NL doesn't offer great high frequency isolation. I used the balanced AES output to connect to the EMM Labs DAC2X for the entire review period. Adjacent to the AES and coaxial outputs are LED indicators of power, lock, and sample rate. The sample rate indicators are a very nice feature. They don't indicate if the audio is bit perfect from the computer but they do provide feedback that can indicate something major has gone wrong. For example, if a user is playing CD quality content at 44.1 kHz but the V-Link 192 indicates the sample rate is 96 kHz the user immediately knows something isn't right.

     

     

     

    Playback

     

    3_vlink192-outputs-silver-cropped.pngMost playback during the review period was via my C.A.P.S. v2.0 server running Windows 7 and JRiver Media Center with WASAPI - Event Style as the output mode. During playback the V-Link 192 adjusted to new incoming sample rates immediately without pops, clicks, or hiccups. The major sonic differences between the V-Link 192, the Alpha USB, and a straight USB connection to the EMM Labs DAC2X were atmosphere, transients, resolution and focus. On Randi Tytingvaag's Red or Dead (24 bit / 44.1 kHz) her vocals were just a touch less focussed or defined and the edges of the bass were rounded just a tiny bit. Everything else on this track sounded great through the V-Link 192. On Antonio Forcione's Heart Beat (24 bit / 48 kHz) his guitar strings were a little less defined, crisp, clear and focussed compared to the Alpha USB and a direct USB connection into the DAC2X. Similar to Red or Dead, Take Five performed by Antonio Forcione and Sabina Sciubba (24 bit / 192) suffered a little loss of resolution and focus in the vocals. The acoustic guitar gem that is Ottmar Liebert's One Guitar (24 bit / 96 kHz) revealed the V-Link 192 doesn't quite reproduce the atmosphere of this live recording like the best interfaces and DACs. The sound was a bit closed down and the transients just weren't at the same level as I'm used to with the direct DAC2X USB connection. Most of the shortcomings identified were fairly small. The V-Link 192 is an overachiever as evidenced by great sonic performance of everything else on the aforementioned recordings. On Virtuoso from Joe Pass the entire album sounded great. I would be hard pressed to find major audible flaws that detract from the performance. Pop recordings like those from my favorite Christina Aguilera are nearly indistinguishable whether played back through the V-Link 192, the Alpha USB or a direct USB connection to the DAC2X. This is great news for computer audiophiles with mainly pop music collections at 16 bit / 44.1 kHz.

     

     

     

     

    Conclusion

     

     

    cash-logo-black-thumb.jpgReaders contemplating the purchase of a USB to S/PDIF converter should start with the V-Link 192 for $399. Some users may find this is the last converter they'll ever need to buy while others may realize the V-Link 192 isn't going to eek out every ounce of performance from a high end system. Spending $399 on this converter will either leave one with plenty of cash for music downloads or be a small price to pay to realize one needs something better. Comparing the V-Link 192 to other interfaces and a direct USB connection was pretty easy in my Spectral Audio / TAD Labs CR1 / EMM Labs DAC2X system. This system is incredibly transparent and reveals the shortcomings of most connected components. It's hard to say what the sonic differences would be between the V-Link 192 and other converters on a different system. One item readers must consider is the ability of the DAC2X to reject jitter and noise coming into its AES/EBU input. Most DAC manufacturers say their products reject incoming jitter extremely well or something to that effect. In reality no DAC rejects all jitter and many DACs handle jitter differently. What I'm getting at is the V-Link 192 performance will likely vary from system to system and users should demo the unit if possible. Getting nearly 90% of the performance at a fraction of the price is a no-brainer for most computer audiophiles. I highly recommend walking before running and I highly recommend starting with the V-Link 192 before spending hundreds or thousands of dollars on another USB to S/PDIF converter.

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    Product Information:

     

    • Product - Musical Fidelity V-Link 192
    • Price - $399
    • Product Page - Link ex.png
    • User Manual - Link (PDF) ex.png

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    Specifications:

     

    • Input data: 24 Bit 192kHz USB stream (maximum)
    • Output Impedance: 50 Ohm SPDIF
    • Operating Systems: Apple Macintosh Apple OS X 10.6.4 and later, Windows XP (SP3), Vista, and 7, Linux Kernel 2.6.33 or later
    • Inputs: 1x USB 2.0 Type B
    • Outputs: 1x Coaxial SPDIF galvanically isolated, 1x XLR AES/EBU Balanced Digital, galvanically isolated
    • Dimensions - WxHxD (mm): 95 x 45 x 170
    • Weight (unpacked / packed): 350g / 400 g

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    Associated Music:

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Does that fact that V-Link has a 50 Ohm S/PDIF output instead of 75 Ohms make it an electrical mismatch for DACs?

     

    Any thoughts on improvements that the V-link would bring into a Naim DAC compared to the SPDIF output on my ASUS Essence ST?

    /John

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Does that fact that V-Link has a 50 Ohm S/PDIF output instead of 75 Ohms make it an electrical mismatch for DACs?

     

    I second this question, after running into USB issues with my Audiolab M-DAC I've only just purchased the V-Link and am horrified to think the two aren't going to play well together.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I second this question, after running into USB issues with my Audiolab M-DAC I've only just purchased the V-Link and am horrified to think the two aren't going to play well together.

     

    After a reasonably quick call to Audio Fidelity (UK) I was presented with the response "Ah yes, erm ...you should be ok when using short lengths, but I wouldn't go over a metre or two"

     

    Thankfully that sounds doable for me, although given that most digital interconnects come in at 75 ohms I can't help but wonder why they've selected this particular impedance value.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After a reasonably quick call to Audio Fidelity (UK) I was presented with the response "Ah yes, erm ...you should be ok when using short lengths, but I wouldn't go over a metre or two"

     

    Thankfully that sounds doable for me, although given that most digital interconnects come in at 75 ohms I can't help but wonder why they've selected this particular impedance value.

     

     

    Re: the Impedance mismatch:

    Looking at the circuit on my Issue#3 board (below):

     

    The output is fed via R12 + R13 in parallel, which equals 240ohm [2400] +110ohm [1100] = 75.429ohm

    The signal is then fed into a 1:1 impedance-match transformer, which provides a conjugate-match of the transmission line.

     

    While this may not alleviate all the concerns re: Impedance-mismatch, I believe it does help to clarify the design slightly.

     

    - I can only conjecture that the 50-ohm impedance number that Musical Fidelity quote is likely for the shunt-impedance value of the matching-transformer itself, and not the actual source impedance.

    vlink-192-coax-underside-sm.jpg

     

    vlink-tx-detail-sm.jpg

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for making time to look into this and to provide such as well researched response.

     

    I bought a V-Link 192 in the end (After JohnnyFiama beat me to the one that was on ebay!) prior to us both posting here.. small world. I am really happy with it, connected into my Naim DAC

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sounds great into my Rega Dac, big improvement over the standard Vlink.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For those of you that are interested, I have composited together an image of the entire Issue #3 board (taken from individual shots of both sides of the board), that shows the circuit design and signal pathing. - (Complete with typo on the silkscreen !)

     

    Viewed from top: http://i652.photobucket.com/albums/uu247/borisx8/vlink-layers-view-from-top-x.jpg

    Viewed from bottom: http://i652.photobucket.com/albums/uu247/borisx8/vlink-layers-view-from-bottom-x.jpg

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As far as I can see the same type transformer is used for the two outputs. For the balanced AES/EBU 50+50ohm is close enough to the 110ohm spec, however, for the single ended output maybe MF only uses one transformer winding which results in a 50ohm impedance.

     

    For those of you that are interested, I have composited together an image of the entire Issue #3 board (taken from individual shots of both sides of the board), that shows the circuit design and signal pathing. - (Complete with typo on the silkscreen !)

     

    Viewed from top: http://i652.photobucket.com/albums/uu247/borisx8/vlink-layers-view-from-top-x.jpg

    Viewed from bottom: http://i652.photobucket.com/albums/uu247/borisx8/vlink-layers-view-from-bottom-x.jpg

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Have a uLink on the way :~)

     

    Want to try the ST fiber link for great isolation.

     

    Hi Chris,

     

    How does MF V-Link 192 compare to Bel Canto uLink?

     

    Thanks

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris - Thanks for the informative review - I'm a newbie and I came across the review by accident when considering purchase of the product. My question is this - I have a early generation Trends UD 10 and I will be using it to feed either a Monarchy 22b dac or a City pulse 7.2 with TCXO upgrade using a MAC mini or project ipod dock as source.

    Do you have any insight on the Trends unit vs the v-link, do you think that there would be any appreciable upgrade or should I just update to a dac with a USB input and simplify the signal chain?

     

    I like the idea of being able to use the balanced out of the City pulse direct to my First Watt Aleph J.

     

    Any insight on the USB to Digital conversion side would be greatly appreciated

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not sure what is happening with the V-Link 192 , but I picked it up a few weeks ago from Listen Up on clearance for $199. It plays nicely with the Micromega MYDAC I picked up from them a couple of weeks earlier. The MYDAC is no slouch for $360 (which I found sweeter sounding than the Dragonfly) but the SQ was noticibly improved when adding the V-Link 192. I thought I had a great sounding stereo a couple of months ago and figured I would have to invest thousands more to get any noticible improvement. Both of the above products, along with Audirvana +, have greatly enhanced my listening pleasures!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    With the demise of the Squeezebox Touch, I will eventually transition to Mac mini--> USB/SPDIF converter--> DAC. Since the Mac mini is 60 feet from the DAC, I intend to use a short USB cable and a long (55 feet) 75 ohm (Belden 1694A) digital coax.

     

    From the above discussion, I'm not clear whether the 50 ohm output impedance of the V-Link 192 precludes its use in my system. Any clarification or informed opinion would be most welcome.

     

    many thanks,

    Pete

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've owned the M2tech Hi-Face, the Halide Bridge and the Original Musical Fidelity V-Link (all 24/96khz units). I've heard some other highly regarded units but never owned them so I will not make any comparisons. Suffice it to say the other units did not tempt me to purchase them. The MF V-Link 192 leads the others I've owned and heard by a mile. It sounds far more musical, whereas the others always sounded "Digital." Based on my experience the V-Link 192 is only beat by the Audiophilleo2+PurePower, which I have now. Even though the Audiophilleo is better, I could live with the V-Link 192 if I did not have the financial option of the Audiophilleo. (Had to save my pennies) The MF V-Link 192 is that good, so if your funds are limited, look no further. Too bad it has been discontinued but they do appear on the used market for less than $200.

     

    The CA review sums it up best by saying: "The V-Link 192 costs roughly 20% as much as the best USB to S/PDIF converter I've used yet it delivers near 90% of the sonic performance. I highly recommend the V-Link 192 for the vast majority of users who don't feel the urge to spend vast amounts of money squeezing the remaining few percentage points of performance from their systems."

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...