Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Chord Electronics QBD76HD / QBD76HDSD DAC Review

    thumb-1010173.pngThe Chord Electronics QBD76HD is a very unique digital to analog converter to say the least. The QBD76HD is one of a handful of distinct DACs designed around FPGAs rather than a mass produced silicon DAC chip. Externally the QBD76HD is just as unique with a rock solid aluminum enclosure and a simplistic yet sophisticated industrial design audiophiles have come to expect from Chord. Tying both external and internal design together is a one-of-a-kind large glass porthole that enables a blue LED lit view of the inter-workings of the QBD76HD. In addition to its unique design the QBD76HD has a unique sound that ranks right up there with some of my favorite DACs.

    [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    opening-750.png

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    The Chord QBD76HD DAC of Distinction

     

     

    _1010178.pngLove it or hate it the Chord QBD76HD looks like no other DAC. It's small frame just 13.3" wide x 2.4" high x 5.7" deep enable placement in many more locations than traditional DACs. The DAC's 15.4 lbs. weight is comprised mainly of its beautifully finished aluminum enclosure. During the review I opened the top of the unit to swap chips and was pleasantly surprised to see very thick walls on all sides of the QBD76HD. I'd assumed there would be minor corner cutting or thinning of the aluminum somewhere. I was fortunate to have both the black and silver versions of the QBD76HD in for review. I prefer the silver version because the light color allows one to see the detailed metal work with curves and cut-outs much better than the anodized black version.

     

    The QBD76HD contains two glass portholes. The small porthole allows the user to view an informational display for items such as buffer size, input selection, and sample rate. The much larger porthole is less informational to the untrained eye. Nonetheless the large opening displays a nice looking internal design that inspires a certain pride of ownership. Surrounding the large porthole are little blue LED lights that illuminate the inside of the DAC as well as emanate a surreal blue light into one's room. When projected on the ceiling of my dark listening room the blue light produced dreamlike clouds. For the most part I liked the effect of the blue lights. Unfortunately there is no way to disable the lights. Users who love the sound of the QBD76HD but dislike the light show may be forced to hide this distinctive looking DAC in a breathable cabinet to stop the light from entering the listening area.

     

    Internally the Chord Electronics QBD76HD DAC is all about Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA). In layman's terms an FPGA is like a blank digital canvas that allows engineers to program any function into the chip. Chord uses FPGAs to gain flexibility in design and to distinguish itself from most other high end companies. The QBD76HD contains a Xilinx Spartan 3 FPGA, with 1.25 million gates. Everything digital in this DAC is done via FPGA. For example switching of SPDIF inputs, all digital SPDIF decoding, digital PLL, RAM buffer controller, WTA filtering, and the 5th generation Pulse Array DAC are all FPGA controlled.

     

    Chord is on the 5th generation of its Pulse Array DAC. Among the improvements to this version of the delta-sigma DAC are the noise shaping and jitter reduction capabilities. DACs use noise shaping to reduce noise in the audio band. The Pulse Array DAC uses 8th order noise shaping. This is higher than any known DAC according to Chord. Jitter reduction in the QBD76HD is done via a digital phase-lock loop (PLL) as opposed to more conventional analog PLLs. Chord specifically addresses data related jitter with this digital PLL and avoids the distortion and noise of an analog PLL with this design. Readers should note this PLL design is only used for the traditional S/PDIF and AES inputs.

     

    The QBD76HD also contains a RAM buffer. Such a buffer has been the subject of countless Internet discussions with many armchair engineers suggesting a RAM buffer is the panacea to all digital problems. A button on the top of the DAC allows the user to select No Buffering, Minimum Buffering, or Maximum Buffering. According to Chord, "This RAM buffer sequentially takes all the data, retimes it, and sends it out. The RAM buffer allows the jitter free local clock operation without needing to send back a clock signal to the data source." That said the DAC does offer word clock output to send clock to a device such as a Lynx AES16 or Merging Technologies Mykerinos card. Maybe this is the belt and suspenders approach. During the review period I discovered one annoying issue when using the RAM buffer at its Maximum setting. I warmed up to the fact that playback is delayed by about three seconds after selecting play while the buffer is filled. However when switching between tracks of different sample rates such as from 24/96 to 24/192 with the buffer set to Max the first two or three seconds of the next track are completely skipped. It sounds as if the buffer is filled, but playback starts without the initially buffered data. I adjusted several settings within JRiver Media Center such as pausing playback for a few seconds when switching sample rates so the DAC's clock has time to lock in the new rate. The QBD76HD locks in on the new rate very fast anyway, but I wanted to eliminate all possible causes of the issue. I found the only way to hear a complete track including the first few seconds when switching sample rates is to set the QBD76HD's buffer to zero. One work around is to restart the new track once playback begins as the restarted track will keep the sample rate already set in the DAC. This buffer issue isn't a showstopper for me. I'm fairly sure Chord can adjust its on-board software to eliminate the issue if it's reproducible in the Chord test lab.

     

     

    Click to enlarge

    _1010169.png _1010173.png _1010176.png _1010177.png _1010178.png _1010182.png

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Chord QBD76HD Inputs of Distinction

     

     

    The QBD76HD wouldn't be a Chord product if it didn't contain a unique twist on its inputs. Chord is one of a few DAC manufacturers who require dual wire AES. Dual wire AES requires two AES/EBU cables from a transport or sound card for 24/176.4 and 24/192 playback. Sample rates at 96 kHz and below function fine with only a single wire connection. Requiring dual wire AES is a design decision based on performance. The manufacturers with this requirement have waived the convenience of a single wire connection because they believe performance gains can be had with two wires. I've discussed single versus dual wire a few times with different engineers. Some say this is a gray area and dual wire is really the way to go for ultimate performance while others suggest the Audio Engineering Society has all but concluded single wire is sufficient.

     

    One configuration I've never seen is dual wire TosLink. The QBD76HD manual specifies dual wire for 176.4 and 192 sample rates even via TosLink connection. I don't know how one would configure this using consumer hardware such as any PC with two optical outputs. I'm guessing this is more of a professional specification.

     

    There are two 75 ohm BNC coaxial S/PDIF inputs on the QBD76HD. The BNC connector is capable of a true 75 ohm connection, unlike RCA and XLR connectors, and is preferred by many engineers and consumers. If nothing else the locking BNC connector is much more desirable than the more common and sometimes problematic RCA connector. At the end of the review period I tested the coaxial inputs on both Chord QBD76HD DACs I had in-house using a Berkeley Audio Design Alpha USB to feed a digital audio signal. According to the user manual the QBD76HD is capable of sample rates up through 192 kHz over a single coaxial S/PDIF connection. According to my tests the QBD76HD has trouble with higher sample rates via coaxial S/PDIF.

     

     

    Black QBD76HD Without Chip Upgrade

    Bottom Coaxial S/PDIF input: Display indicated Lock during playback of 176.4 and 192 kHz material. The display never indicated the sample rate as it should and sound was never produced out of the analog outputs. Thus playback of 176.4 and 192 material via single coaxial S/PDIF wire didn't function.

    Top Coaxial S/PDIF input: Display indicated Lock during playback of 176.4 and 192 kHz material. The display never indicated the sample rate as it should and sound was never produced out of the analog outputs. Thus playback of 176.4 and 192 material via single coaxial S/PDIF wire didn't function.

     

    Silver QBD76HD With Pre-production Chip Upgrade

    Bottom Coaxial S/PDIF input: Capable of playback of 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, and 192 kHz via single wire without problems. Attempts to play 176.4 material resulted in a barrage of clicking sounds emanating from the DAC. The clicking noise is from the output relays as the DAC struggled to obtain a good digital lock from the output of the Alpha USB. During normal playback there is a single click when the sample rate changes and the clock locks. During playback of 176.4 material the clock was incapable of locking thus producing the very fast clicking heard in this recording done with my iPhone.

     

    Click for audio Recording ex.png

     

    Top Coaxial S/PDIF input: Capable of playback of 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, and 192 kHz via single wire without problems. Attempts to play 176.4 material resulted in clicking sounds emanating from the DAC every 10 to 15 seconds while the music played. The clicking noise is from the output relays as the DAC struggled to obtain a good digital lock from the output of the Alpha USB. These were the same output relay sounds as produced through the bottom input. Here is a recording of playback using the top coaxial S/PDIF input.

     

    Click for audio Recording ex.png

     

     

    Note: According to Chord it has many customers using QBD DACs with 24/176.4 material and the DAC has always worked well. Before publishing this review I used the Musical Fidelity V-Link 192 as a different USB to S/PDIF converter to test the coaxial inputs at high sample rates. I was unable to play 24/176.4 material at all and playback of 24/192 material suffered from the clicking of the output relays while struggling to obtain a digital lock from the V-Link output.

     

     

    Click to enlarge

    _1010186.png _1010188.png _1010190.png _1010193.png _1010196.png _1010200.png

     

     

     

     

    cable-thumb.jpgThe vast majority of my listening was done through the QBD76HD's high speed USB input capable of playing PCM audio up through 24/192 and pure DSD audio using the DoP v1.0 standard (chip upgrade required for DSD playback). The original QBD76 DAC contained a Bluetooth input that has been replaced in the HD models with the high speed USB port. Both the HD and non-HD versions of the DAC contain a full speed USB port capable of 44.1 and 48 kHz playback using an inferior adaptive USB transfer mode. The HD version's high speed USB port is differentiated from the full speed USB port by a unique Lemo four pin connector. This Lemo connector fits perfectly in the hole left by the Bluetooth antenna allowing a much simpler upgrade from the QBD76 to the HD version. Chord supplies a Lemo connector terminated USB cable for use with the high speed USB port. I was unable to find a source for USB cables with this unique connector other than Chord. However the Lemo connector can be purchased from Internet sources if any computer audiophiles are brave enough to terminate their own cable.

     

     

    Lemo-Connector.png

     

     

     

    The high speed asynchronous USB input uses a Cypress USB receiver that hands the data off to a discrete Xilinx CPLD. Chord worked with an Italian USB design team to develop the necessary driver interface but the handling of the USB data is Chord's own proprietary design. The Xilinx CPLD handles all of the clocking and data and switches two crystal oscillators, one each for sample rates based on 44.1 or 48 kHz, to give the correct clock information for the sample frequency.

     

    This async USB input is on an electrically isolated card, replacing the Bluetooth card, that is completely separate from the main DAC circuitry and power supply. The DAC circuitry itself has several layers of power supply regulation and filtering to protect the audio circuit from any induced noise. Each main component such as the crystal clock generator, the op amp output stages and the S/PDIF inputs have their own discrete power supply sections to provide as much isolation as possible.

     

    Custom software / drivers are required to use the QBD76HD on both Apple's OS X and Microsoft's Windows operating systems. A linux driver is currently unavailable.

     

    During the review period I heard a high pitched whine coming from my speakers when listening to the QBD76HD via its high speed USB input. This high pitched whine was fairly quiet but still audible when listening for it but only when playback was stopped. I duplicated the issue with both DACs and both pre and post DSD chip upgrades. I measured the high pitch at 5323Hz when connected via USB to my battery powered MacBook pro and 4887Hz when the DAC was connected to my C.A.P.S. v2.0 server's ex.png SOtM tX-USB card. Chord attempted unsuccessfully to reproduce this issue and provided measurements taken with an Audio Precision analyzer that display no such noise. I was unable to reproduce the high pitched whine after replacing the QBD76HD with an EMM Labs DAC2X. That lead me to believe the Chord DAC was 100% the cause of the issue. However, after placing the Chord DAC back in my system and changing amplifiers from my Spectral Audio DMA-260 to the Bel Canto ref1000m mono blocks the high pitched noise also stopped. At the direction of Chord I tried several different configurations and was unable to pin down the exact cause. The noise wasn't caused by the DAC alone and wasn't caused by my amplifier alone. I'm willing to chalk this one up to a system incompatibility that an experienced local dealer could probably help resolve.

     

     

    USB-NOT-Connected-NOT-Connected-To-MacBo

     

     

    Here is an FFT graph of the sound coming from my speakers without the Chord QBD76HD high speed USB input connected.

     

     

     

    USB-Connected-To-MacBook-Pro.JPG

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Here is an FFT graph of the sound coming from my speakers with my MacBook Pro running from battery connected to the Chord QBD76HD high speed USB input using the supplied USB cable.

     

     

     

    QBD76HD-AP-results-480.JPG

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Here is the Audio Precision graph from Chord that displays no noise in the areas I measured in my system.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Chord QBD76HD A Distinctive Sound

     

     

    Over the years I've listened to many DACs. A sure sign of a great DAC is one that can keep me from checking my email or browsing CA while in my listening chair. During the entire review period of a couple months the QBD76HD kept me engaged 100% of the time. This DAC has a unique sonic signature that produced great sounding music through my system. The QBD76HD's unique sound is less like the airy Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC and closer to, but less vivid than, the dCS Debussy. The readily apparent sonic signature of the QBD76HD is a full mid bass, plenty of slam, and beautiful decay. Listening to Ottmar Liebert's One Guitar at 24/96 through the QBD76HD I noticed the guitar reproduced just a touch thicker than I am used to hearing through my Alpha DAC or I could say the Alpha DAC is a bit thinner. Either way both DAC reproduce Ottmar's guitar wonderfully but different. The full mid bass and punchiness of the QBD76HD was pleasantly audible during Elvis Costello's (The Angels Wanna Wear My) Red Shoes and Watching The Detectives from his The Best of Elvis Costello: The First 10 Years album. I must have listened to the opening of 'Detectives' five times with the volume plenty loud. Not only were the drums impressive but the bass line throughout the track was just as prominent and engaging through the QBD76HD. I really like Elvis Costello's version of Almost Blue but he can't compare sonically to his wife Diana Krall's rendition from The Girl In The Other Room at 24 bit / 96 kHz. Near the 3:25 mark of the track and running through the end is a wonderfully full and deep bass that was worthy of a few replays during the review.

     

     

    Plenty of bass and transient slam can be heard through the QBD76HD on the Kansas City Symphony's performance of Passacaglia at 24 bit / 176.4 kHz. The bass was deep and controlled, maybe a tad thick for my taste or what I'm used to, but very enjoyable. Passacaglia and Martin Vatter's Walchensee, Mondnacht from the album Klangbilder I in high resolution 24/88.2 both helped this Chord DAC shine when reproducing incredible instrument decay. On Passacaglia the instruments rang out with great decay, hanging on and fading very delicately. On Walchensee, Mondnacht the wonderful decay of the piano's hauntingly deep notes and piercing high notes seemed to hang on and on and on in a very good way. I didn't get the sense that the QBD7HD was memorializing the events in any manner.

     

     

    Listening to the vocals of Randi Tytingvaag's Red Or Dead I heard a bit more smoothness than I am used to hearing. I prefer her vocals a bit more stern, but the smoothness wasn't enough to detract from the otherwise great reproduction of the other elements of this track. Throughout the track instruments can be heard in the background coming in and out with the bells very prominent. On the track My Heart Belongs To Daddy a similar coming and going of instruments can be heard in both channels. Through the Chord QBD76HD the sounds are very clear, distinct, and the separation of instruments is terrific.

     

     

    Near the end of the review period I received a DSD capable chip from Chord. I swapped out the chips inside the DAC to enable pure DSD playback using DSD over PCM (DoP v1.0) through the high speed USB input. Pure DSD playback without conversion to PCM was flawless on both Mac OS X with Pure Music and Audirvana Plus and on Windows 7 with JRiver Media Center version 17. I listened to The Blue Coast Collection 1 & 2 from Blue Coast Records in both 24 bit / 96 kHz PCM and 1 bit / 2.8224 MHz DSD. These albums were recorded to analog tape then transferred to DSD. The PCM version was created using Korg's Audiogate (I believe) from the DSD files. Vocals on the PCM version sounded very synthetic compared to the native DSD version through the Chord QBD76HD. The vocals almost sounded like a recreation or Technicolor version of the DSD version. This is most evident when listening to Keith Greeninger and Dayan Kai on Looking For A Home. In addition, the center image on the PCM version sounds like Keith is singing through an orange traffic cone compared to the laid back and much wider center vocal image reproduced with the pure DSD layback of the QBD76HD.

     

     

    The beauty is the ability to hear this collection in pure DSD like Blue Coast intends it to be heard. This has nothing to do with a format war or PCM v DSD. If this recording was done live to two track at 24/192 PCM I'm willing to bet I'd be singing the praises of the PCM version over a converted DSD copy. Now that record labels and artists are releasing pure DSD recordings it's wonderful to hear these recordings in their native format. The QBD76HD is in a position to playback PCM and DSD over USB without a glitch.

     

     

     

     

    Conclusion

     

     

    cash-logo-black-thumb.jpgThe Chord Electronics QBD76HD is a great digital to analog converter. This DAC is unique from all points of view. Externally the QBD76HD looks sophisticated, simplistic, and modern. The blue LED lights add a touch of "because we can" engineering and I like that from Chord. Its thick, bomb proof, aluminum housing with clear glass porthole exude quality and richness. Internally the QBD76HD is just as unique. Built around custom FPGAs instead of DAC chips produced by the millions Chord will never be accused of copycatting or following the mass market. Chord Electronics ltd. marches to its own drummer as does the QBD76HD DAC with its unique sound. The QBD76HD not only looks great but sounds great as well. I thoroughly enjoyed every piece of music played through this DAC. From fine details at low levels to bombastic transients at concert levels the QBD76HD reproduced it all wonderfully. The Chord Electronics QBD76HD DAC with asynchronous USB input to 24/192 is highly recommended and one of my new favorite DACs.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Product Information:

     

     

     

    • Product - Chord Electronics ltd. QBD76HD DAC
    • Price - QBD76HD $7,000, QBD76HDSD $8,500 (with DSD option)
    • Product Page - Link ex.png
    • User Manual - Link (PDF) ex.png

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Hi Guys - I just received an updated model number and updated price for this DAC.

     

    The QBD76HD is $7,000 (high speed USB to 24/192)

     

    The QBD76HDSD is $8,500 (high speed USB to 24/192 and DSD)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Based on a couple of years of reading the forums here, it seems that plenty of us can afford 6K DACs. Luckily for those that can't afford them or don't think it is a smart way to allocate their audio budget, Chris has reviewed plenty of less expensive DACs.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Mav - I understand what you're saying. However you didn't address your comment about the DAC being over priced. Too expensive is one thing but over priced is another.
    Chris overpriced, well for my bank account would be spending a lot of cash for a single source component that I just could not can't hear the difference to warrant a purchase. The proof is the my ears.

     

    InnerGroove

    Why quote the US census when the reality is that vast majority of people don't know about DACs, let alone ones that are in this class?
    just to show in the US the majority of the people are not out there overspending their yearly income on high end stuff of any kind unless the are in love with major debt. In my opinion, no doubt the overall majority of people be it teens, college kids, and the normal us family are happy with their iPod, iPhone, Lap Tops, Bose speakers, ear buds, Android devices, AVR's, BD players and iPads devices for their music. So your correct these vast majority of people don't know about DACS, or just don't care about DACS much less DAC's that cost thousands of dollars. I would think they feel the DACS in their equipment works just fine. ( both the iPad and the iPhone are using the Cirrus Logic 338S0589 for the audio DAC, and some models have the Wolfson DAC)

     

    But there is nothing wrong with cool equipment, I own a lot of cool high end stuff, cars, boats, multiple homes but sometimes one has to be logical about what you can hear vs what you spend to hear a difference.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To JonP and Crimsondonkey,

     

    I think you're both right. In my opinion Chord are voicing (if that's the right expression) some of their kit differently these days. I've read numerous reviews both in the press and from users stating that their streamers and DAC's are very analogue sounding now. But... the QBD76 before the HD upgrade was a bit "in your face" as a musical experience. Personally, I didn't mind this as I have a fairly laid back system and there was a good synergy.

     

    However, having had the HD upgrade, I'm certainly not the first to state it seems to really change the character of the DAC. You still get the amazing speed and resolution, but with more weight and a far more balanced sound.

     

    Apparently Chord are releasing a top end streamer, the DSX-1000. I'm hoping to hear it at a dealer open day in July. Maybe Chord can send one to Chris for review.... :)

     

     

    I admit I have not heard the higher range models in Chord but I have lived with my base model Chrodette Gem for about 5 months now (listening around 10 hours per week) and fatigue and throwing the music at you would be the absolute opposite characteristics to how I perceive the Gem. I have found it to be the smoothest, least grainy, least fatiguing and most analogue-like digital conversion device I have ever heard within it's price range and some way beyond it as well. The imaging is also excellent being very deep, wide and posessing a very black background. I have trouble believing Chord's higher models would be worse.

     

    I could listen to the Gem all day long without any fatigue or discomfort whatsoever, and their better models are supposed to be significantly better. I do know it is sensitive to the quality of the power supply and USB cable, but once they were sorted it was very smooth sailing.

     

    I realise I speak not having heard their top models but I cannot help thinking that anyone who does not like the Chord house sound has some synergy or other issues elsewhere in their system, possibly transport, cable and / or power related. Although sound is of course subjective there are limits. No one would call a Ferrari a slow car, for example.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chrille, what is the reason you didn't finish the review you are criticizing? Chris CLEARLY talked about the Chord's DSD capability when he played Cookie's DSD downloads from Blue Coast. Why do you not see that?

     

    Also, I do not want a reviewer, Chris or anyone else, to review a piece of equipment with music he/she is completely unaware or unappreciative of. It would have no merit. Same as me reviewing a book written in Chinese. Useless to all intended. Chris doesn't know or like Channel Classics; don't ask him to give us his perspective on what they sound like on the Chord!!! (you like exclamation points).

     

    And finally, this is NOT the first DSD DAC he has reviewed. The Meitner MA-1 is a completely DSD-based DAC.

     

    Chris, can you comment on the differences in DSD sonics (not asking which is better, per se) among the Chord and the two Meitners? Is there a big enough difference in timbre, tonality or soundstage to make a statement about its overall DSD sound, or like its PCM sound you mention in your review, is it again more like the DCS/Meitner camp than the Weiss/BADA one?

    Hello Ted,

    You definitely have got some very valid points there especially the one,regarding musical tastes and the possiblity of things getting "lost in translation".

    To me basically all RAP or Hip Hop I have heard sounds like "a cat through a mincer" and I wouldn't dream of using any such music to evaluate the SQ of any HI FI equipment ever. The stuff makes me feel sick.

    But on the other hand,the reason I keep bringing up Classical Music in general and in this case Channel Classics often superb recordings, is that IMO it is absolutely essential to use the most demanding the most complex acoustic music if one really wants to know how good or bad a DAC or any other piece of HI FI equipment sounds .

    Chris did again use some excellent, very revealing pcm recorded Classical Music material from Reference Recordings which I appreciate and can clearly relate to.

    But when I suggested using similarly well recorded pure DSD material form Channel Classics his reaction is very negative. I find that very strange,but then again maybe I was using too many !!! and ???

    To me it is particularly important to use the best available material when reviewing equipment in the price range the Chords retail at imo.

    Most probably the only actual differences that there are of any significance between different DACs in that price range is how they handle very subtle things like natural reverberation tails and tonality, soundstage, transparency and timbre ie how well they handle the natural timbre of acoustical musical instruments, or an unamplified human voice.

    ps I did see that he had played analogue recorded material converted to DSD ,what I was asking for was his comments on DSD recorded material, but Chris choose to omit to report in his review of the Chord his feelings regarding pure DSD recorded stuff.

    Once again no offence intended but I am genuinely interested in discussing and any reports regarding the possible differences between DSD and PCM and the more opinions and input I can get the better IMO.

    If I read your own post above correctly ou are basically asking for the same thing in more polite terms than I did though.

    Happy listening Chrille

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    FGPA's are the way to go for high end DAC, or any DAC for that matter.

    Adaptability is the key which is often difficult with fixed silicon, unless you use a messy driver which the OS can knock dead in one go easy enough with a benign update.

    Accuphase, Playback Designs use FGPA for their DA algorithms, maybe Meitner as well (not sure). If you pay well over $5000 for a DAC, FGPA is about at the top of the list together with a power cord and USB connector on the check list for a DAC. At least you have a better chance of future proofing your purchase. Seems strange that the Chord would need a chip upgrade for DSD, is DSD an afterthought?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, I've written about the sound character about the Chord in the past as well, with the same findings from Chris, and also often compared it to the Berkeley too - which I feel are the two DACs to listen to in this price range. Both are good sounding, just depends which matches your system/taste.

     

    I do feel that there is some difference in sound character when engaging the buffer and would have like to see another person's opinion on that. :) I personally often listen without buffer nowadays.

     

    One thing I do like about Chord is that they continue to push the envelope on the DAC, keeping it relevant with the HD upgrade and now the DSD upgrade, so customers like me don't have to buy a completely new product.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And if ever you accidentally run a tank over your DAC; be thankful of Chord's build quality...

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Am I missing something.

     

     

    Yes - these are not DSD recordings!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cris have you noticed this?

    Products: QuteHD

    It would make a nice review, now that you have brilliantly review it's big brother!

     

    Or the index

    Products: Index

     

    I had two hours listening to the QuteHD DSD DAC today, comparing it to my M2 Young, with DSD original recordings (from Telarc SACD rips) and PCM derived material.

     

    It is very impressive, natural sounding on DSD - clearly better with DSD recordings than when converted to PCM at 176Khz.

     

    A clear step above the M2 Young in terms of realism - bass guitar sounded distinct and full bodied, voices were more natural with less vocal sibilance. (M2Y was converting to PCM at 352Khz.)

     

    The Chord QBD76HD which is in the larger case - similar to the previous generation DAC64 was also used for comparison.

     

    This was not the DSD version - so I had to convert DSF files to PCM on the fly. Despite this it was again a step up from the Qute (you'd hope so at over 4X the price!). Keeping the natural sound of the Qute but with more transparency and polish, the mix became more 3D with clearer separation between instruments.

     

    However I think at £1k the Qute is a steal - I hope that Chord (a small British company) can get the production high enough, as I suspect this will be a best seller!

     

    I'm eagerly awaiting the QBD76HD DSD

     

    I used MacBookPro with Audirvana and the Chord software.

    QuteHD DSD-3.jpg

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris,

    Did you by any chance try using the word clock output connected to a Lynx AES16 card? Or in your opinion with the advancement in USB, make the Lynx card outdated technology. Would the AES16 even support DSD?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...