Jump to content
IGNORED

Article: Is It Time To Rethink Lossless?


Recommended Posts

"Lossless" actually tells me something useful because I have low expectations. 🙂

 

If any compression was used, the uncompressed version (whether original, highest resolution available, etc., or not) can be reconstructed from it without any loss of data? Good enough for me. Anything beyond that - provenance, quality, available resolutions, upsampling, downsampling - needs further investigation if I care enough to know about it. *Should* we have information on these latter types of qualities? It would be nice, but on the other hand we wouldn't have @Josh Mound's "The Best Version Of..." series then would we? 😉

One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller

The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein

Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...