The Computer Audiophile Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 View full article Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted May 16, 2023 Author Share Posted May 16, 2023 3 minutes ago, cfisher said: Chris, thanks so much for writing about Mitch's new filters. It's hard to believe that there was more clarity and detail to wring out of the SR1a. That is undoubtedly the best $50 I have ever spent on my stereo. Thanks, Mitch, for keeping at it! Isn’t it just crazy? Crazy cool that $50 can get you an upgrade larger than some that cost $50,000. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted May 17, 2023 Author Share Posted May 17, 2023 12 hours ago, AudioDoctor said: Is it possible to use the filters in HQP along with the DCS Equipment? Yes mitchco 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted May 17, 2023 Author Share Posted May 17, 2023 14 hours ago, cfisher said: Chris, you are using the filters in Roon despite the apparent tap bug? Have you compared how the filters sound in Roon and HQPlayer? Yeah, still doing it with Roon despite the bug. I need to get HQP 5 and test. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted May 19, 2023 Author Share Posted May 19, 2023 1 hour ago, mitchco said: Hi @cfisher I agree. I listened to the SR-1b FIR filters in Roon's convolution engine, HQP, JRiver, and HLC. I could not hear a difference, I wanted to take it a bit further and measure Roon's convolution engine to see if the filter is being corrupted in anyway, The short answer is no. I used REW to generate a "sweep" file that could be played in Roon. A 5 Hz to 22,050 Hz, 44.1 kHz sweep file was played in Roon with no convolution (or any other DSP) applied. I used BlackHole as a virtual loopback driver to route the output of Roon back into REW's input to be measured. This is a "control" test to see that we get the "expected" flat frequency and phase response: Sure enough, perfectly flat frequency and phase response. Next I loaded a "test" high resolution headphone FIR filter at 65,536 taps into Roon's convolution engine. I noted that while the sweep was playing Roon displayed the "bug" of 22K taps: Of course, it should be displaying 65,536 taps or 66K in Roon speak. And the measurement: I made the test headphone filter complex to test any inconsistencies. Lets compare using another convolver. I setup a test where the output of Roon is going into BlackHole, but the output of BlackHole is going into the input of Hang Loose Convolver (HLC) and the output of HLC, using another virtual audio driver called Ground Control, routes the output back into the input of REW. I loaded HLC with a Dirac pulse 65,536 tap FIR filter, which is a "do nothing" FIR filter so we can see that again, as a control test, we get the expected flat frequency and phase response: Sure enough. Now loading the same test FIR filter, we see HLC correctly reporting 65,536 taps: And the measurement result: Looks the same as Roon's convolver test. Lets make sure by overlaying the results. Frequency response: Identical. Phase response: Identical. Conclusion: While Roon may have a convolution bug of some sort, it is definitely not affecting or corrupting the frequency or phase response of these high resolution headphone FIR filters. Back to listening to music. I’m glad my ears were right for once :~) mitchco 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now