Jump to content
IGNORED

Objectivity is based on subjective experience


erin

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
5 minutes ago, AnotherSpin said:

Tests and various "scientific" methods do not seem to me to be certain enough or certain in a long perspective. If we look at the history, we can see how often scientific methods have led to false conclusions, and opinions based on them have been revised radically afterwards. 

 

Yes, but how many times have such methods lead to the right conclusions?

 

Also, these revisions that you mention are an integral part of the scientific method.

 

Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby
Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley
Through the middle of my skull

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, AnotherSpin said:

 

They already did, by sharing the truth with me and everybody else.

 

Is the scientific method at odds with this "truth" or simply a different way of expressing it?

Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby
Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley
Through the middle of my skull

Link to comment
1 hour ago, AnotherSpin said:

 

Yes, and you may also notice that modern science has finally 'discovered' something that the Upanishads said quite clearly thousands of years ago.

 

The scientific method used in "modern science" isn't really modern as it's based on the works of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. 

Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby
Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley
Through the middle of my skull

Link to comment
18 minutes ago, March Audio said:

No one is saying that Frank.

 No one is saying measurements are the only way.

 

Frank isn't one to let facts get in the way of a good rant...

Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby
Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley
Through the middle of my skull

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...