Fluffytime Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 2 hours ago, GUTB said: No. Hence the fictitious DSM publication (3.666). @Ralf11 is struggling as a comedian. Most of his work are unfunny one-liners that often don’t make any sense. Here he is attempting to expand on the one-liner base, but it falls flat because by inventing a DSM classification he diminishes any comedic value it might otherwise have. Making up a DSM article could still be mined for humor using the similarity of the source material — for example by making a Audiphilia DSM quick reference card and posting an image of it. You're so cute. Can we date? I promise I'll make you feel special. Like really special. Link to comment
Fluffytime Posted March 17, 2018 Share Posted March 17, 2018 Yeah, because science is dumb, right? Hah, yeah! Stupid people who actually know shit. Losers. And @Nordkapp, please change your handle. We norwegians would prefer that you not drag our good name through the mud with your pseudo-science BS. I bet you've never even been there. Thanks . Link to comment
Fluffytime Posted March 18, 2018 Share Posted March 18, 2018 16 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said: @Fluffytime This is your one warning to stop personal attacks. If you can’t get along with people that you disagree with, you’ll have to find somewhere else to contribute your vitriol. Sorry about that. You are right, I did cross the line. The Computer Audiophile 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now