Ralf11 Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 5 minutes ago, sandyk said: It is when backed up by correctly performed, positive DBT results, which many E.E.s claim ARE the " Gold Standard", until the results don't go the way they expected them to ! one needs to present the methods as well as the claims Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 15 hours ago, sandyk said: results that can't be reasonably explained. when coupled with a lack of methodology it is no surprise that people reject this if you want to be believed you will need good strong evidence unusual results require unusual proof -- and anything appearing to contravene known physical laws is indeed unusual mansr 1 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 2 hours ago, mansr said: New physics is pretty much confined to high-energy accelerators these days. you forgot the interiors of theoreticians skulls - lotsa new physics rattlin' around in there Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blinded_experiment Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted March 23, 2018 Share Posted March 23, 2018 c'mon - it sounds great to the technically illiterate -- ya gotta give him some points for the BS (if not for using polysyllabic words) Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now