4est Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 1 hour ago, JamesBardsley said: Fair enough. But they say the jolt of electricity involved in the off/on process can be worse than leaving it on, on balance. Depending on the equipment. I am not sure if I understand your concern about capacitor replacement. It is a simple task for most any technician. I'd be more concerned about the quantity of them. They appear to be Elna Silmic. You could research their longevity if you feel the need. Forrest: Win10 i9 9900KS/GTX1060 HQPlayer4>Win10 NAA DSD>Pavel's DSC2.6>Bent Audio TAP> Parasound JC1>"Naked" Quad ESL63/Tannoy PS350B subs<100Hz Link to comment
4est Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 Does anyone have a pic or a link to the new board? Forrest: Win10 i9 9900KS/GTX1060 HQPlayer4>Win10 NAA DSD>Pavel's DSC2.6>Bent Audio TAP> Parasound JC1>"Naked" Quad ESL63/Tannoy PS350B subs<100Hz Link to comment
4est Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 On 8/20/2019 at 4:43 AM, matthias said: Comparings DACs with the same server is like comparing cartridges with the same turntable. According to the Source First principle the server or turntable is much more important for the SQ than the DAC or cartridge. So one can save money with buying a very good server and a less expensive DAC. Matt Really? The source first principle included the entire turntable and did not separate the platter assembly from the cartridge IIRC. I can see how one might think a transport is equal to a DAC in relevance, but not that a better transport could offset a poorer DAC. Forrest: Win10 i9 9900KS/GTX1060 HQPlayer4>Win10 NAA DSD>Pavel's DSC2.6>Bent Audio TAP> Parasound JC1>"Naked" Quad ESL63/Tannoy PS350B subs<100Hz Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now