Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Review

    AlphaBlu2.jpgOver the last few months I've talked more about the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC than perhaps any other product. The Alpha DAC appeared on the CASH List from the very beginning and has since been the subject of several reader discussions here on Computer Audiophile. Under normal circumstances I would be concerned as frequently discussed products often don't live up to the hype they've generated. This however is not a normal circumstance. The Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC is seriously out of this world. At $5k it's a relative bargain in high-end audio terms and there is nothing like it available today.

     

     

     

     

    Berkeley Audio Design

     

    Berkeley Audio Design was founded by René Jaeger, Michael “Pflash” Pflaumer, and Michael Ritter. All three gentlemen are well known for their previous work at Pacific Microsonics. Pflash Pflaumer is the co-inventor of the HDCD process, in addition to writing all the digital algorithms used in the Pacific Microsonics Model Two. The Model Two is commonly thought to be the best ADC / DAC produced in recent memory. Unfortunately there were only 150 Model Twos produced and they have long since been out of production. This past weekend on my trip to Seattle and the San Francisco bay area I had a chance to meet with all three founders of Berkeley Audio Design. I talked to René Jaeger over breakfast in Seattle, before heading to the Bay Area. Then I spoke with Michael and Pflash during lunch at Eccolo in Berkeley, CA. All three Berkeley Audio Design founders are first class guys who were very eager to discuss the Alpha DAC and computer based audio in general. After discussing some technical details about the Alpha DAC with Pflash I realized that he has likely forgotten more information than I'll accumulate over the course of my entire life.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Alpha DAC Features

     

    As I said in my opening paragraph, the Alpha DAC is seriously out of this world. Sonically I've never heard better. In addition to sound quality the Alpha DAC has some fabulous features that are indispensable. The single most important feature of this DAC is its ability to decode HDCD and illuminate an HDCD indicator when HDCD encoded content is detected. One constant in the world of computer based audio is the worry that looms over listeners wondering if their computers are outputting bit perfect data to their DACs. The HDCD indicator on the Alpha DAC is not foolproof, but there is a 99.99% chance that a computer is outputting bit perfect data if the HDCD indicator is illuminated upon playback of an HDCD encoded track. This is because the HDCD flag is located on the 16th and 24th bit of 16/44.1 and 24/44.1-192 content respectively. As I noted in a response to a reader in September, "If the HDCD indicator illuminates on the Alpha DAC, the data is uncorrupted. Theoretically, it is possible to alter HDCD data using specialized software while not touching the LSB, but all of the typical mechanisms that might alter data in a computer environment such as level shifting, dither, SRC’s, etc. will definitely affect the LSB. And, if the LSB is altered the HDCD code is lost. So, as a practical tool, presence of the HDCD light indicates no alteration of the data file."

     

    The Alpha DAC's front panel display indicates the current sample rate or volume level depending on the listeners selection. This is an easy way for listeners to verify that data coming out of their computer has the correct sample rate. Avoiding software sample rate conversion (SRC) is a high priority for many listeners. The Alpha DAC display removes almost all ambiguity from the computer playback process. If you're playing a 24/176.4 track from Reference Recordings and the Alpha DAC is not indicating the presence of HDCD and the sample rate is not indicating 176.4, then you know you have some configuration issues. Compare this to a user without the Alpha DAC who thinks his computer is performing at its highest level even though the sound is not quite right. I think we'd all like to know when the sample rate is wrong and remedy the situation ASAP so we can get back to listening unaltered music. We've all had issues with our audio systems, traditional or computer based, and we've all jumped for joy when inserting a component that solves the issue or when removing a component causing the trouble. I've said to myself more than once, "how could I have listened like that for weeks without knowing something was wrong?" The Alpha DAC gets us one step closer to identifying sources of imperfect sound. In my conversation with Pflash a couple days ago he stated that the display of the Alpha DAC is updated at the very beginning of a track. Thus, the Alpha DAC reads a 176.4 track and updates the display instantly upon playback. Following the sample rate update the display totally "disengages" (my word, not Pflash's) from the rest of the DAC. This is among many other design elements that contribute the Alpha DAC's stellar sound quality.

     

    Possibly the most underrated part of the Alpha DAC is its ability to bypass a pre amp and connect directly to a power amp(s). The Alpha DAC has its own digital volume control that is as well implemented as I've ever heard. Trust me, I'd have a pre amp in my system in a heartbeat if I thought the Alpha's volume control degraded the sound in any way. As a test I connected the Alpha DAC to a pre amp and was so disappointed I reverted to the pre amp-less configuration in under two tracks. I spoke to Berkeley Audio Design's Michael Ritter about the digital volume control and he indicated that even the best pre amps in the industry can degrade the sound coming from the Alpha DAC. The digital volume control and analog output stage in the Alpha DAC are very solid. That said, I do know people using pre amps with their Alpha DACs. Some people must use a pre amp for the analog inputs and others just like the sound of their system using a pre amp. When the Alpha DAC is used with a pre amp the optimal volume setting on the DAC is 54 dB. The main point to keep in mind is the Alpha DAC offers listeners options. The Alpha DAC has traditional DAC inputs and outputs. Both single ended RCA and balanced XLR connections are available for the analog output. The usable inputs are limited to AES/EBU, S/PDIF, and Toslink.

     

    Shortly after the Alpha DAC arrived I noticed a barely audible hum coming from the DAC. I immediately thought something was wrong so I contacted Michael Ritter seeking an answer. What Michael told me only solidified my belief that sound quality was the foremost concern of the Berkeley Audio team. He explained that the Alpha DAC has two totally separate power supplies for digital and analog, and two power transformers. The dual bobbin transformers used in the Alpha have very high isolation between the primary and secondary windings that provides maximum immunity from line noise. One side effect of this high isolation is a narrow area of magnetic field that causes the bottom of the DAC to hum a little bit. Berkeley Audio Design could have opted for an absolutely silent solution at the cost of sonic degradation. Listeners will be happy to know the hum is inaudible when listening to music even at the lowest volume the Alpha DAC is capable of producing, 0.1 dB.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Sound

     

    During the Alpha DAC review I used two different computer sources. One source was my Mac Pro running OS X and a Lynx AES16e PCI-Express digital I/O card outputting AES/EBU to the Alpha DAC. The other source was my very inexpensive Dell Inspiron 530 running Windows XP and the Lynx AES16 PCI digital I/O card. I played back WAV and AIFF files with sample rates from 44.1 to 192 kHz. The software applications used were iTunes 8 (OS X), Amarra (OS X), Foobar2000 (XP), and MediaMonkey (XP).

     

    The single most recognizable and talked about characteristic of the Alpha DAC is its soundstage. I describe the soundstage as expansive, transparent, and three dimensional. The soundstage produced from the Alpha DAC is unlike anything else. It is perhaps what makes the music reproduced through the Alpha DAC sound live instead of recorded. Listening to Crown Imperial from the Dallas Wind Symphony at 24/176.4 was truly an awesome experience. The music appeared to float in front of my listening chair and reach all the way to the back wall of my listening room at times. The transparency of the Alpha DAC is unparalleled by any DAC I've heard in recent memory. This includes some very highly regarded DACs at the 2008 Rocky Mountain Audiofest. The Alpha DAC's ability to remain extremely resolving at very high and low frequencies is astounding. Very complex orchestral material is no challenge for the Alpha DAC. Each instrument has clear separation from the top to the bottom of the spectrum. Since the Alpha DAC / Lynx combination supports everything up to 24/192, I listened to a plethora of high resolution albums during the review period. In fact I must have played the Reference Recordings HRx material at 24/176.4 more times than I can count. In order to truly give the Alpha DAC a workout and push the DAC to its limits, high resolution material is a must. Don't get me wrong the Alpha DAC handles 16/44.1 material like no other, but why listen to low resolution when you don't have to? Transients through the Alpha DAC were highly dependent on the source material and components. This is another feather in the Alpha DAC's cap as the DAC does not produce sound that it isn't presented. For example, using iTunes and the AES16e card on my Mac appeared to produce what I call rolled transients. The sound didn't quite have the edge present in the original recording, but this was not a fault of the Alpha DAC. Switching over to my XP machine with a Lynx AES16 and MediaMonkey the transients were clearly present with authority. Listening to Fanfare for the Common Man at 24/88.2 (HDCD) was an eye-opener. The attack of the drums was intense at high volumes. I almost felt like the "blown-away guy" photographed by Steve Steigman for the popular Maxell advertisements of the late 1970s and 1980s. I did listen to each interface on the Alpha DAC and settled on the AES/EBU as my favorite. I must admit this was not an apples-to-apples comparison because I used the Lynx card as my digital I/O for the AES/EBU output and I used the Mac's built-in TosLink output as another digital I/O. Hardly a fair comparison, but I used available interfaces that many readers will consider when using the Alpha DAC or the DAC of their choice. Overall the sound of reproduced music through the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC was absolutely stunning. I have very good reason to include the Alpha DAC on the CASH List without hesitation.

     

    My review of the Alpha DAC would not be complete with comparing it to the competition. I consider the two premiere DACs at the moment to be the Alpha DAC and the Weiss Minerva. (When the full Sonic Studio Amarra software/hardware package is released I expect it to be very compelling as well). I came to this conclusion through my own listening tests, as I did have both units here at the same time, and based on the frequent communication I have with Computer Audiophile readers. Even at Rocky Mountain Audiofest I ran into a very nice CA reader who was inquiring about an Alpha DAC versus the Minerva. It's a very hot topic to say the least. First and foremost both DACs are capable of incredible sound, as evidenced by my reviews of each DAC. Provided you have the proper interface you won't be disappointed by either DAC. Deciding which DAC to chose is entirely personal and depends greatly on the listener's taste, available interfaces, and feature requirements. Both DACs are right around $5,000. In my opinion the major sonic difference between the two is soundstage. I described the Alpha DAC's characteristics in detail above so I'll get right to the Minerva. The Minerva has a much more focussed soundstage that may be narrow to some listeners. On the other hand this focussed and tight soundstage is exactly what some listeners are seeking. In a way the Minerva is like plugging into the soundboard to make a live recording and the Alpha DAC is like placing microphones elsewhere in the venue. Next those considering each DAC should consider the interface required. If you need FireWire the choice is rather easy. The Minerva has FireWire 400 in addition to other interfaces whereas the Alpha DAC has the three aforementioned traditional interfaces. The Minerva also has digital outputs should you need it as a FireWire to AES interface. To further narrow down the choice between DACs the listener should consider the features of each DAC. The Alpha DAC is very strong in this department with the built-in volume control, remote control, ability to bypass a pre amp, HDCD decoding and indicator of bit perfect audio, and the sample rate display on the front panel. In addition to these considerations I strongly recommend potential purchasers contact a local dealer to discuss their needs. Berkeley Audio Design and Weiss have lists of dealers available on their websites.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Conclusion

     

    There is a very valid reason why Berkeley Audio Design is selling Alpha DACs as fast as it can produce them. The Alpha DAC is simply stunning. The Berkeley Audio Design team is one of the most respected in the industry. They have succeeded in their goal of making a very high level of fidelity available to music lovers everywhere. That is unless the music lover is in a ROHS required country, but that's a story for a different day. At $5,000 the Alpha DAC is a high-end audio bargain. This level of quality and features could honestly sell for twice or three times the price. Every Alpha DAC owner and audiophile I've talked to who has heard the DAC has been very impressed. In a recent DAC shootout for the Bay Area Audio Society the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC took first place hands down. I would not be surprised to see the Alpha DAC ascend to the top of many lists and receive much deserved accolades in the weeks and months ahead. Whether I'm using Mac OS X or Microsoft Windows the Alpha DAC from Berkeley Audio Design is my reference DAC for the foreseeable future.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Manufacturer: <a href="http://www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com/">Berkeley Audio Design, LLC</a>

    Phone: 510-277-0512

    Email: [email protected]

    Alpha DAC Price: $5,000

    <a href="http://www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com/dealers.html">Dealer List</a>

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment: Mac Pro, Lynx AES16e card, Kimber USB cable, Cambridge Audio DacMagic, Weiss Engineering Minerva, Benchmark DAC1 PRE, Kimber Select cable, Avalon Acoustics speakers, Focal Electra Be series speakers, McIntosh tube amplification, Virtual Dynamics power cables, Richard Gray's Power Company cables, Bel Canto USB Link.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Alpha DAC Details from berkeleyaudiodesign.com:

     

     

     

     

    PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS

    •Highest audio quality DAC

    •All distortion products below one part per million

    •Unequalled interpolation technology up-samples 44.1kHz CD’s to almost 176.4kHz quality and

    provides superb fidelity at all sampling rates from 32kHz to 192kHz

    •IR remote control of all functions including volume and balance allows direct connection to power amplifiers

    •Advanced input signal jitter rejection

    •BADA encrypted input allows future support of HDMI and other DRM formats

    •Designed by Pacific Microsonics Model One and Two design team

     

     

     

    CONTROLS & INDICATORS

    •Input selects AES, SPDIF, Toslink or BADA inputs

    •Lock LED indicates input signal lock

    •HDCD LED indicates HDCD code detected

    •Phase sets absolute phase

    •Invert LED indicates absolute phase inverted

    •3 digit LED display of Stereo/L/R attenuation, Sampling Rate and Filter type

    •± controls set attenuation level and select Filter type

    •Mode selects Stereo/L/R attenuation, Sampling Rate and Filter type display modes

    •Dim selects multiple display brightness levels

     

     

     

    SPECIFICATIONS

    •Input sampling rate: 32kHz to 192kHz

    •Input word length: 24-bit

    •Two channel analog stereo outputs: XLR balanced and RCA unbalanced

    •Digital Inputs: AES - Single XLR 110?, SPDIF - BNC 75?, Toslink – Optical, BADA encrypted - RJ-45

    •HDCD decoding detects 16-bit flag at 44.1kHz or 24-bit flag at all sampling rates

    •Multiple digital filter options

    •Multiple units can be combined for multi-channel/surround reproduction

    •Balanced analog output level: +18dBu maximum, +12dBu or lower recommended

    •Unbalanced analog output level: 3.25Vrms maximum, 2Vrms or lower recommended

    •Digital attenuation and balance control: 0.1dB/step with .05dB/step trim, 60dB range

    •Frequency response at ? 88.2kHz sampling rates: ± 0.1dB from < 0.1Hz to 35 kHz, - 3dB at 59kHz for 176.4kHz and 192kHz sampling rates

    •Distortion at recommended levels: all products ? -120dBFS

    •THD+N at maximum level: < -110dBFS

    •Setup stored in non-volatile flash ROM

    •Firmware field upgradeable through signal inputs

    •Enclosure dimensions: 1.75”H X 16.5”W x 10.4”D, 19” rack mount option

    •Mains voltage: 100/120/240VAC, 50/60Hz

    •Power consumption: 25W

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    <br />

    "I'm guessing most other DACs change the audio stream sometime between when it hits the unit and when it's delivered to the actual DAC chip. Upsampling and downsampling are very popular whether a consumer is aware of it or not. For example some DACs allow you to enable upsampling while others upsample without you even knowing. I guess the signal is likely to be changed at some point before the actual DAC chip with most DACs."<br />

    <br />

    Chris,<br />

    I believe you may even be understating the likelihood of unannounced digital signal processing that happens... e.g., Amarra are proposing a dedicated device for hardware based DSP as a required component of their Sound Server, are they not? <br />

    <br />

    clay<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the hum is vibration of the power transformer, a PS Audio Hum Buster might fix it.<br />

    <br />

    The Hum Buster cures hum caused by DC offset in your AC power line. However, this usually happens only in the large transformers used in power amps.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Bob - I believe the PS Audio Hum Buster is for a different type of hum altogether. My hum issue does not produce sound out through the audio system. It is the case itself vibrating which is because of the design of the power supply. Thus power supply produces better quality audio but not without a small price (vibration).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris,<br />

    <br />

    The mechanical vibration you experience is the *only* type of hum the PS Audio Hum Buster is designed to ameliorate. (Specifically, mechanical vibration of the power transformer due to eddy current in the transformer caused by DC offset in the AC power mains.)<br />

    <br />

    The Hum Buster has no effect on electrical hum audible through the loudspeakers.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A digital volume control does not specifically enable you to bypass a preamp, as you know the Benchmark Dac1 allows the user to connect directly to an amplifier and it uses a post coversion analog volume control. The difference between a digital volume control and an analog volume control is the analog volume control does not reduce resolution where a digital volume control does. If the Berkeley is not truncating some bits in its manipulation of volume it would be interesting to learn how the volume is controlled digitally.<br />

    <br />

    Here is a link to a discussion of how digital volume control works, www.audiocircle.com/circles/index.php?topic=36767.20<br />

    Of course this may not be the only way to do it but am interested in how Berkeley is able to do it without reducing resolution.<br />

    <br />

    Thanks<br />

    Sean<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Sean - I talked to the designers of the Alpha DAC about your comment, looking for an accurate answer for you. I'll paraphrase my discussion with Berkeley Audio Design below:<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    You are correct to be concerned about truncating the digital data. This operation not only reduces the resolution, it also creates distortion products that are frequently audible. Berkeley Audio Design does not truncate the data. They scale it using 32-bit math and re-quantize it to the resolution of the DAC (24-bit) using the proper dither. This process does not generate distortion – it maintains the linearity. In addition, Berkeley Audio Design has carefully chosen the gain structure of the DAC to match the gain of typical power amplifiers and sensitivity of typical loudspeakers. This insures that the DAC itself is operating in an optimal fashion with minimal distortion The noise floor of the DAC in a system is not audible from the listening position, and the noise floor of the DAC is much lower than the noise floor of the recordings being played. There is no loss of resolution. <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for tracking down the answer. Certainly sounds like a more sophisticated method of implementing digital volume control<br />

    <br />

    Sean

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Bless them for dithering! I would love to hear the Berkeley because the same folks who designed it also made the Pacific Microsonics HDCD Model 2 DAC, a favorite amongst recording studios until Microsoft bought the company for software patents I believe and axed the hardware side completely. Truncating is why I can't stand using Itunes for playback software. It truncates to 16-bit while my DAC processes using 32-bit float to 24-bit using dithering just as the Berkeley does; and compared to Pro Tools Itunes sounds as if everything is straining through the speakers and fatigues my ears. There is a piece of software called Audio Hijack Pro which allows you to use a variety of dithering plugins for use with Itunes which would better suit my DAC, but I haven't coughed up the $$ for it because I use Pro Tools instead. I like having the option though.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    Thanks David, for sharing this idea about dithering. I have Audio Hijack Pro, but was unaware of it's potential for applying plugins.<br />

    <br />

    I found a thread on Apple Support forums that offers more details WRT dithering as a possible explanation for quality loss via iTunes playback as compared to 'pro tools', e.g. Logic, Pro Tools, etc.<br />

    <br />

    http://tinyurl.com/9s92uz<br />

    <br />

    interesting...more ghosts to chase. <br />

    <br />

    In addition to Izotopes 64-bit SRC, Wave Editor also licenses iZotope's Mbit+ Dithering, BOTH of which have been licensed for use in Soundblade (the precursor to Amarra's software).<br />

    <br />

    Wave Editor costs $79, free trial is available. :)<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    enjoy<br />

    clay<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Guys - Thanks a ton for the Apple forums link. I'm doing similar research right now and noticing some of the very same things others have noticed between iTunes and other applications like Mastering tools etc...<br />

    <br />

    Lately I've been using Samplitude / Sequoia Digital to test playback sound versus other applications. Now I'll have to check out Wave Editor.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    <br />

    David indicated he uses a Digi Design 003 interface in a previous post.<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    enjoy,<br />

    clay<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    (I deleted and completely rewrote the analysis I posted yesterday.)<br />

    <br />

    Referring to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantization_noise, the unweighted signal-to-noise ratio (SN) for a sine wave digitized with a resolution of B bits is SN = 6B + 1.8 dB. Conversely, the effective resolution B of a sine wave test signal as a function of the signal-to-noise ratio is B = (SN-1.8)/6.<br />

    <br />

    Bob Harley's review of the Berkeley DAC says it uses an Analog Devices DAC chip. Their best chip is the AD1955. <br />

    <br />

    Graph "TPC 13" in the AD1955 spec sheet indicates that the "typical" distortion+noise relative to a full scale 1 KHz sine wave is -110 dB, which is (110-2)/6 = 18-bit resolution. For a 1 KHz sine wave attenuated by 40dB or more, the same graph shows the distortion+noise relative to full scale (NOT relative to the attenuated signal level) is -117dB, which is (117-2)/6 = 19 bits below full scale. This means the DAC chip has only 19 bits of precision. Assuming the 20th bit adds a half-bit of resolution via dithering, and assuming Berkeley achieves an additional half-bit of resolution by using two chips in differential mode, the DAC still has only 20 bits of resolution.<br />

    <br />

    Each 6 dB of attenuation reduces the resolution by 1 bit. Therefore, if you use the digital volume control to attenuate the signal 24 dB, you are losing 4 bits of the theoretical 24-bit resolution. Since the DAC has only 20 bits of resolution anyway, this is OK. However, if you apply more than 24 dB attenuation, you will lose 1 bit of resolution for each 6 dB attenuation below 24 dB.<br />

    <br />

    If you use a high efficiency loudspeaker with a high power amp, you probably need to attenuate the signal more than 24 dB, which would result in loss of resolution.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Bob - Thanks for the interesting analysis. I'm going to run this by the guys at Berkeley Audio Design for their opinions.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, I'm using a Digi Design 003 with a Black Lion Audio Micro Clock and am quite happy with the reproduction.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Bob - I did a little research into your analysis and found it's over-simplifying things a bit. I am not qualified to get into the very technical discussions but I do know this is a much more complex issue that can be explained in a few paragraphs by either of us. If it was simple everyone would produce outstanding DACs.<br />

    <br />

    Anyway, thanks again for your analysis. It's really great to read intelligent opinions from readers around the globe, even if we don't all agree.<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi, Chris<br />

    <br />

    I finally got my alpha DAC few days ago, but only able to hook it up last night. It's a amazing DAC, in addition to the soundstaging, the vocal and the musical instruments are so alive, just like in my room. Thanks for your recommendation.<br />

    <br />

    I also copy the file from HRx sampler in WAV and AIFF format (using Max) in my iMac, connecting to the DAC by a optical cable (Wireworld SupraNova), and to K&H O300 directly. However, from the screen of the DAC, the iMac is outputting 96kHz signal to the DAC. Is there anything wrong in my iMac setting?<br />

    <br />

    With regards,<br />

    <br />

    WF

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi avreality - Glad to hear you like the DAC. The iMac optical output is limited to 24/96 for OS X. If you use bootcamp and install Windows Vista the optical output will support 24/192.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for your reply, Chris.<br />

    <br />

    It's really frustrating, I switched my OS from Window to Mac , partly because of the better performance of itune in mac than that in Window. Is the AFI1 or Vesta from Weiss the only solution for 24/192 output ?<br />

    <br />

    By the way, will the light of HDCD on when the output from my iMac is bit-perfect? What can I do if the light is off when playing music in iTune?<br />

    <br />

    Thanks in advance for your help.<br />

    <br />

    av

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Bob Stern - I agree with your analysis. It's independent of the DAC actually. The resolution is ultimately impacted in order to achieve proper listening levels.<br />

    <br />

    You can get some relief with some USB and WiFi interfaces that change the data from 16/44.1 to 24/44.1. the extra 8 bits gives you about 10dB. After this you start whittling away LSB's. Sonos and Empirical Audio USB are two examples that change 16/44.1 into 24/44.1.<br />

    <br />

    The optimum scenerio is to have a DAC that can be reduced in volume about 10-12 dB in the analog domain, or at least without affecting the data. If one could do this, then 24/44.1 data could be reduced in volume digitally an additional 10dB without impacting the data. The 8 bits of additional "padding" gives you about 10dB. This way remote controls such as Touch and iPhone can be used from the listening position and you dont need a remote for the DAC.<br />

    <br />

    One would start by calibrating with a quiet track by adjusting the non-destructive volume control until a good listening level is achieved. Then, when a louder track comes on, one can adjust the volume down by as much as 10dB digitally without impacting the resolution. The difference between the loudest and quietest tracks I have found is less than 10dB.<br />

    <br />

    This is exactly how my new Overdrive USB DAC works BTW.<br />

    <br />

    A 3:1 or 4:1 transformer would probably do the trick for the Berkeley. Just enough to reduce it about 12-14dB.<br />

    <br />

    Steve N.<br />

    Empirical Audio

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please confirm if the following is correct or if I am misunderstanding something:<br />

    <br />

    Converting by 16/44.1 files to 24/44.1 will not increase the volume of the files during playback. But it will allow me to digitally reduce the playback volume by about 10dB without losing any information.<br />

    <br />

    Or said another way, any digital volume control on the playback of a 16/44.1 file will degrade the sound.<br />

    <br />

    Thus, I should have 24-bit audio files if I want to use the volume control on my Apple remote or iPhone and do not wish to degrade the sound.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Please confirm if the following is correct or if I am misunderstanding something:<br />

    Converting by 16/44.1 files to 24/44.1 will not increase the volume of the files during playback. But it will allow me to digitally reduce the playback volume by about 10dB without losing any information."<br />

    <br />

    Correct, once you have a comfortable listening volume, an additional -10dB comes at no degradation to the data.<br />

    <br />

    "Or said another way, any digital volume control on the playback of a 16/44.1 file will degrade the sound."<br />

    <br />

    Yes, but you may not be able to hear it depending on the resolution of the system, the software and the amount you are reducing the volume. Sometimes the software makes adjusments as well. I recommend that you do your own experiments.<br />

    <br />

    "Thus, I should have 24-bit audio files if I want to use the volume control on my Apple remote or iPhone and do not wish to degrade the sound."<br />

    <br />

    24/44.1 files are definitely superior, not only for the DAC, but allow for some volume control. Expect better sound quality too. BTW, 24/44.1 files are also bit-perfect with Vista, and 16/44.1 are not. If your player S/W does not support this, you can get R8brain or Adobe Audition and convert the files from 16/44.1 to 24/44.1. Give it a try. I think you will be pleasantly surprised.<br />

    <br />

    Steve N.<br />

    Empirical Audio

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If your 24-bit DAC has a sample rate converter (SRC), the SRC inherently converts 16-bit data to 24-bit data before it undergoes D/A conversion, so it would be pointless to convert it to 24-bit manually.<br />

    <br />

    I agree with Steve Nugent's recommendation if your DAC does not employ SRC.<br />

    <br />

    Incidentally, SRC is condemned by some audiophiles, but it is used in the superb DAC's by Bryston and Berkeley Audio Design. Perhaps it helps that both use the SRC to perform synchronous upsampling of CD data (i.e., upsampling to 88.2 or 176.4 KHz, which is an integer multiple of the original 44.1 KHz sample rate) instead of upsampling CD's asynchronously to 96 or 192 KHz.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think I agree with "if your 24-bit DAC has a sample rate converter (SRC), the SRC inherently converts 16-bit data to 24-bit data before it undergoes D/A conversion, so it would be pointless to convert it to 24-bit manually".<br />

    <br />

    The recommendation is to use a digital volume control on a 24-bit file instead of a 16-bit file. This happens before any DAC, such as the Berkeley Audio DAC. As discussed previously, using the digital volume control on a 16-bit file will degrade the file before it reaches the DAC, regardless of the DAC used.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...