Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Peachtree Audio Nova Review Part II

    iMac-BG-Nova.jpgA little over one week ago the Peachtree Audio Nova review was published here on Computer Audiophile. Since that time many CA readers read the review and left honest comments. I've also read and re-read the review and spent quite a while reading every single comment several times. I was initially surprised by the criticism. After a few days I came to the realization that the CA readers were right. The review was in fact rushed and didn't contain much information to make it useful. It clearly did not live up to the CA trademark <i>All The Bits Fit To Print</i>™. Thus, I'm taking full responsibility for a half-assed review and making it up to all the supportive CA readers. Over the last five days I've dedicated time to using the Nova in almost every configuration imaginable. What follows are my impressions from "The Nova Sessions."

    [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

     

     

    <b>Back By <s>Popular</s> Demand</b>

     

    A brief recap of the Nova's specs is in order before an explanation of what I call The Nova Sessions. The Nova consists of an 80 watt integrated amplifier, Class A <30 ohm variable preamp-output, five transformer coupled digital inputs, user selectable on/off 6922 tube output stage, three analog inputs, a galvanically isolated USB stage, ESS 9006 Sabre DAC, eleven regulated power supplies for the DAC, home theater bypass, and a Class A tube headphone section. I utilized every feature except the headphone output during The Nova Sessions. The music server used was a Mac Pro running OS X Snow Leopard and Windows 7 64-bit. The components and configurations used are as follows.

     

     

     

    <div style=" border-top : 1px solid #E9EFF3; border-right : 1px solid #E9EFF3; border-bottom : 1px solid #E9EFF3; border-left : 1px solid #E9EFF3">

    <ul>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > Wavelength Audio Proton > Analog RCA > Nova AUX3</li>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > Benchmark DAC1 PRE > Analog RCA > Nova AUX2 & AUX3 Home Theater Bypass Mode</li>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > PS Audio DLIII > Analog RCA > Nova AUX1</li>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > Nova USB input</li>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > Airport Express (wired) > Nova optical digital input 2</li>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > Built-in optical TosLink digital output > Nova optical digital input 1</li>

    <li>Mac Pro Windows 7 > ASUS Xonar Essence STX > Coax S/PDIF > Nova coaxial digital input 1</li>

    <li>Mac Pro Windows 7 > ASUS Xonar Essence STX > Coax S/PDIF > PS Audio DLIII > Analog RCA > Nova AUX1</li>

    <li>Mac Pro Windows 7 > ASUS Xonar Essence STX > Coax S/PDIF > Benchmark DAC1 PRE > Analog RCA > Nova AUX2</li>

    </ul>

    </div>

     

     

     

    Needless to say the Nova looked like a high end audio Medusa with a plethora of cables coming out of the unit. There isn't enough time left in 2010 to compare every component and interface combination possible. I used some logical combinations to compare the Nova's DAC to that of the DAC1 PRE, Proton, and DLIII. I compared the interfaces on the Nova to determine what sounded most accurate to my ears. I also bypassed the Nova's DAC and Preamp section to single out its amplification prowess when connected to the DAC1. All of these comparisons must be taken with an abundance of caution. Singling out a single interface, DAC or any one piece of these components is nearly impossible. One can only try different configurations and report sonic impressions related to those configurations. Each of the DACs involved has its own analog output stage that suffers from its own coloration. In addition auditioning the coaxial S/PDIF interface of these components I used the ASUS audio card that may have limited or enhanced the performance compared to other digital I/O cards available. Hopefully readers can use my impressions as data points to supplement their own listening sessions and cross reference my words with those of many other people who've used these components.

     

     

     

     

     

    <b>The Nova Sessions - No Pictures, No Large Print, Just Results</b>

     

    <ul>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > Wavelength Audio Proton > Analog RCA > Nova AUX3</li>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > Nova USB input</li>

    </ul>

    Listening via the Wavelength Audio Proton connected to the Nova's AUX3 analog input produced a very noticeable background fuzz. This fuzz was absent when listening via USB straight from the Mac to the Nova. This is likely due to volume control compatibility "issues." I was unable to find the right combination of volume level on the Proton and volume level on the Nova. The closest to satisfied I got was with the Proton's volume set to 94. When the proton was set around 90 or below I had to turn up the volume on the Nova to one or two o'clock. The background fuzz was apparent in this configuration as well as with the volume in the mid 90s. However with the Proton's volume set in the high 90s I heard major distortion. This was remedied by turning the Proton's volume down and the Nova's volume up. I did not use the Home Theater Bypass feature of the Nova in this configuration as I'm not a fan of using the Proton's software based analog volume control directly connected to an amplifier. Many CA readers have absolutely no problems using it this way. As I stated in my review of the Proton I don't like depending on software volume controls that may not be as responsive as I need at any given moment. All of this aside the sound of the asynchronous USB Proton DAC was superior than feeding the Nova's USB input directly. The Nova smeared the overall image and severely hindered the decay. Cymbals appeared to face much more naturally via the Proton's DAC connected to the analog input of the Nova. The Nova made voices sound good and a little larger across the sound stage but suffered from a little less definition via it's own USB interface.

     

     

    <ul>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > Airport Express (wired) > Nova optical digital input 2</li>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > Built-in optical TosLink digital output > Nova optical digital input 1</li>

    </ul>

    Optical input from the Airport Express did sound better than the optical feed straight from the Mac Pro's built-in optical output. Voices via the Airport Express appeared a bit further back. Cymbals via the AE were a bit harsh and somewhat unnatural but the decay was more appropriate than what I heard via the built-in optical output of the Mac Pro. Bass was a bit thin via the AE as well. The sound via the built-in Mac Pro optical output was better than the sound fed directly from the Mac Pro to the Nova via USB but not nearly as defined as the analog feed from the Proton. Bass via the built-in optical output was not real cohesive and was inconsistent lacking on some selections and a bit forward on others.

     

    Note: <i>I used the Airport Express digital feed into the Nova's optical input number 2. This input has been adjusted by Signal Path to be more tolerant of sources with higher than average jitter at the sacrifice of a little sound quality. Users previously had issues during playback via an AE until this adjustment was made. In addition not all versions of iTunes and not all versions of the Airport Express work the same. These differences lead to inconsistent results for those seeking to test this at home.</i>

     

     

    <ul>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > PS Audio DLIII > Analog RCA > Nova AUX1</li>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > Nova USB input</li>

    </ul>

    The Nova was sonically superior to the DLIII in every way via both components' USB inputs. The DLIII was not cohesive and sounded artificial. Compared to the Nova everything via the DLIII just sounded wrong. This could be partially due to the automatic upsampling to 24/96 that was done by the DLIII. I didn't try upsampling to 24/192 during this listening session. Via the DLIII to the Nova's analog inputs images were very smeared and voices were not crisp when they should have been. Voices even sounded nasally compared to the Nova.The DLIII's bass definition was less than all the other components and the overall sound was fatiguing and over-saturated. Listening through the Nova's internal upsampling compared to the external upsampling of the DLIII was much better sounding. Upsampling is not a matter of where it takes place. In this comparison the Nova's upsampling produced a much more cohesive sound when compared directly to the DLIII via USB inputs on both.

     

     

    <ul>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > Benchmark DAC1 PRE > Analog RCA > Nova AUX2 & AUX3 Home Theater Bypass Mode</li>

    <li>Mac Pro OS X > USB > Nova USB input</li>

    </ul>

    Connected to the Nova's Auxiliary analog input 2 the DAC1 was set to calibrated mode via the switch on the rear of the DAC1. Calibrated mode bypasses the front panel volume control on the DAC1 for configurations like the one used here. The DAC1 PRE's bass was much tighter than the Nova's when USB inputs were used on both. Keep in mind the DAC1 PRE uses CEntrance code and the TAS1020B chipset for its USB input whereas the Nova does use a rather generic off-the-shelf USB implementation. Compared to the Nova this tight bass didn't have as much texture to it. It's hard to verify which sonic characteristic is the most accurate without hearing the mic feed at the recording. The DAC1 feeding the Nova produced vocals with pinpoint focus and revealing highs. Decay via the DAC1 PRE had a tad bit of overhang and appeared too bold for natural sounding decay. The Nova via direct USB input lacked air around the instruments that the DAC1 PRE displayed. The Nova's bass lacked the DAC1 PRE punch and instruments during complex passages all merged together much more so than the DAC1 PRE.

     

    Following this configuration I flipped the rear switches on the DAC1 PRE and Nova to enable the DAC1's volume control and Home theater Bypass on the Nova. The HT Bypass feature allowed the DAC1 PRE to work as a preamp delivering an analog signal straight to the Nova's power amp. To use an over-generalization the vocals in this configuration sounded like they came out of a cave. The decay was still bold, unnatural, and seemed to hang on for dear life much longer than appropriate. To say it another way, the DAC1 PRE tends to memorialize some events. If it's possible to make a clear conclusion I think the Nova's preamp was a benefit to the sound of the DAC1 PRE. I much preferred the vocal performance via the DAC1 PRE when HT Bypass was disabled and the DAC1's volume control was bypassed feeding the Nova's preamp. In addition I preferred the coaxial input of the DAC1 PRE feeding the Nova's HT Bypass analog input over the previous USB based DAC1 connection. This was better sounding but still required the Nova's preamp section to bring out the best DAC1 PRE had to offer.

     

     

    <ul>

    <li>Mac Pro Windows 7 > ASUS Xonar Essence STX > Coax S/PDIF > Nova coaxial digital input 1</li>

    <li>Mac Pro Windows 7 > ASUS Xonar Essence STX > Coax S/PDIF > Benchmark DAC1 PRE > Analog RCA > Nova AUX3 Home Theater Bypass Mode</li>

    </ul>

    The last configurations I tried used a Windows 7 64-bit based music server. The reason for the switch is the ASUS card does not work with Mac OS X at this time. I used J River Media Center v14 and WASAPI output in Exclusive Mode. I verified bit perfect digital output to the best of my ability via the HDCD illuminator on my Alpha DAC in addition to researching many different configuration options and their results on the bit stream output. The ASUS Xonar Essence STX PCIe audio card feeding the Nova via coaxial S/PDIF was clearly the best sound I received throughout The Nova Sessions. Again, the Nova in this configuration sounded better than all the other components and all the other configurations. The DAC1 PRE's USB input connected to the Nova's AUX2 analog input was a close second. During The Nova Sessions the tube section of the preamp was in use until the very end. With the tube disabled the bass had a bit more texture and the differentiation between bass notes was a tad better. Listening to John Mellencamp's Longest Days at 24/96 the Nova added a little gloss to the vocals that I hadn't heard elsewhere. I'm not a fan of additives in my music, but many readers may find this bit of added gloss pleasing in the short term. Using the ASUS Xonar Essence STX to feed the DAC1 PRE's coaxial input raised a bit of background noise not present when feeding the Nova directly or feeding the Nova via the DAC1 USB based configuration. This could be due to the preamp section or volume control of the DAC1 since the HT bypass only uses the Nova's amp bypassing it's DAC and preamp section. The pinpointed vocals heard via the DAC1's USB input were no longer present via coaxial S/PDIF. The overall sound was a bit sloppy compared to the DAC1's very good USB input.

     

     

     

     

     

    <b>Real Wrap Up</b>

     

    Once again the free flow of information and uncensored Computer Audiophile reader comments have lead to something good. I was called-out on a less than stellar review. After the initial shock I set out to work the Nova over like a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punching_bag#Types_of_bag">speed bag</a> to deliver actionable information and additional data points for the CA readers. The whole process involved pages of notes and a lot of listening to music. I couldn't be happier that the CA readers spoke up and pushed for better information. Bringing out my small arsenal of DACs for a comparison to the Nova was fun and informative. Another plus was Signal Path's David Solomon being open to and encouraging these comparisons. Not all manufactures will allow direct comparisons during reviews of their products. In typical Signal Path form David said, "Let the chips fall where they may." To recap my overall impression, the Nova sounded better than the other components and configurations using Windows 7, J River Media Center, WASAPI + Exclusive Mode, and ASUS Xonar Essence STX outputting bit perfect audio via coaxial S/PDIF to the Nova's coaxial input number one. The Benchmark DAC1 PRE using its USB input, feed by Mac OS X and iTunes, and outputting analog audio to the Nova's Auxiliary input number two was a close second place. The Wavelength Audio Proton is not a recommended combination with the Nova for reasons mentioned above. The Proton continues to be one of my favorite product of 2009 but there isn't any synergy with the Peachtree Nova. The PS Audio DLIII was out of its league during The Nova Sessions although it may perform better in other scenarios. I'd like to wrap things up by thanking the dedicated Computer Audiophile readers for providing constructive criticism that lead to the real completion of the Peachtree Audio Nova review.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    So at the end of the day, what we're saying is that the DAC embedded in this little integrated amplifier with built-in DAC and headphone amp - for $1200 - is superior to that of the giant-killer Benchmark DAC1? - assuming you use coax, of course. That's truly impressive. Even if you skip using the Nova as an amp, you still have an impressive DAC, preamp, and headphone amp for $1200! Wow.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi sturgl - Yes, the Nova is a really great product. There is good reason why these things fly off the shelf at dealers I talk to. These are some of the best dealers in the country as well.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One of my local shops, where I've been spending too much time lately, carries them - and they're flying off their shelves too! It all makes me wish I was in the market for such a device. Thanks, btw, Chris for your fantastic reviews and founding Computer Audiophile. It is just such a great resource! I've been lurking here for a while, and finally thought it was high time I started making a contribution.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just bought this unit from the original owner who had properly burned it in before selling it a few months later to me. I bought it as I needed to get a unit with a remote and I needed to put most of my audio equipment into a AV storage unit.<br />

    <br />

    The only good comparison I can make to another unit is what it is replacing .... a Unison Unico 80W with built in phono stage, and I was using a MHDT Paradisea USB DAC.<br />

    <br />

    I have to say the Peachtree (with NAD PP2 phono stage) isn't up to par with the Unison.<br />

    <br />

    The speakers I am using are Opera Mezza monitors, digital source is Macbook playing AIFF files, analog source is Rega P25/DV 20X.<br />

    <br />

    On the digital side its pretty close to the Peachtree, but the Nova is lacking a bit in bass extension and weight, and the Unico has a little bit more something, a fuller sound.<br />

    <br />

    On the phono side of things there is a big dropoff across the board. This I assume is probably mostly due to the Unico phono stage being better than the NAD PP2? Won't know for sure until I try a better phone stage.<br />

    <br />

    To get back to the sound I am looking for I will probably need to get an amp to use with the Peachtree as a PRE/DAC, and a better phono stage. So after that expense, I don't consider the Peachtree a "giant killer". But it is a pleasant enough sounding unit.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Sandman <br />

    <br />

    I had been running a NAD PP2 into the Peachtree for a while (using a Rega P1 with Ortofon OM20 cart) and I thought this sounded very veiled (I loved the Nova as a DAC/integrated with digital sources, though, like I said in my post from February in my previous setup). <br />

    <br />

    I've since upgraded just about every component that I have in a spasmodic fit of GAS - including replacing the PP2 with a PS Audio GCPH and the P1 with a VPI Classic - but during the equipment transition I did have the following setups that I can comment on, which may be useful regarding your phono stage situation:<br />

    <br />

    Rega P1 -> PP2 -> Nova -> Focal 1027be<br />

    VPI Classic -> GCPH -> Nova -> Focal 1027be<br />

    <br />

    This is an apples-to-oranges comparison because I never tried the P1/GCPH combination, but the difference in sound between the P1/PP2 and VPI/GCPH - both into the Nova/Focals - was drastic (for the better). That's not that surprising given the difference in the components, but I strongly suspect the PP2 was the weakest piece.<br />

    <br />

    I'll try hooking up the P1 to the GCPH this weekend to clarify this, but I suspect you are right about the PP2 being a drag in your setup.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Good reviews (both). Sorry if somehow I missed it, but have you compared<br />

    <br />

    Mac Pro OS X > Built-in optical TosLink digital output > Nova optical digital input 1<br />

    vs<br />

    Mac Pro OS X > USB > Nova USB digital input <br />

    <br />

    I've been using a $0.33 optical TosLink without problems, and I couldn't convince myself that it sounded any better or worse than USB, but I don't have much faith in my ability to hear subtle differences.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for the comments.<br />

    <br />

    "I'll try hooking up the P1 to the GCPH this weekend to clarify this, but I suspect you are right about the PP2 being a drag in your setup."<br />

    <br />

    If you get around to that, definitely let me know what you hear! Thanks in advance.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just listened to a Nova feeding a pair of ERA D5s at Audio Advice in Raleigh, NC. On the input side I had two configurations: 1. Mac -> USB -> Nova, 2. Mac -> USB -> Proton -> Nova, so the Nova amp was used in both cases. If I settled on the Proton, I was likely going to pair it up with a different amp, obviously. But this comparison allowed me to rule out any affects the amp may have had on the sound.<br />

    <br />

    I am fairly picky about my audio, much more than the average person, but probably not as much as many on here. My reaction is that the pure Nova configuration sounded much more open, much better sound stage than the Proton. The Proton sounded "muffled" in comparison. I was surprised, I had been expecting the opposite. As a computer person, I was expecting the Proton's DAC to generate "higher resolution audio". BThe differences I noticed varied depending on the music, but overall I strongly preferred the Nova setup (without the Proton). I probably won't be buying anything for another month or two, but right now I am strongly leaning towards just getting the Nova and D5s.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dave, <br />

    <br />

    I did the same comparison, in the same store, and had the same result. I imagine we both worked with I.H. too :)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, he is great to work with.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for the review! I'll definitely remember your words when I'm looking to for this type of product for my home theater company arizona to use. Thanks again!<br />

    <br />

    Spam link removed - Editor<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I bought my Nova about 15 months ago, based largely on this review, and a few others.<br />

    <br />

    Overall, I am quite happy with it still. The main limitations I have come up against are (a) no way to over-ride the DAC up-sampling, (b) toslink at 96kHz can be a bit hit or miss, and © I needed a bit more power for the amp. Fortunately, the way the Nova is put together, (b) and © were easy to address. I'm now using a USB to SPDIF bridge, and an external amp (one I made from a kit and have housed in a case that matches the Nova (Peachtree very kindly let me buy an extra case).<br />

    <br />

    Their customer service has been absolutely superb, and I still believe I got very high value for what I spent on this thing. I would recommend it to anyone, but for a novice just starting out like me, it was a great way to jump-start my entry into the realm of computer audio.<br />

    <br />

    The new products look even better.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After much research and a limited budget, I finally got my "new" system up and running. Everything was purchased used on Audiogon except the cables and wires. I'm completely satisfied and utterly impressed with the quality of the Peachtree Audio Nova, the centerpiece of it all. Thanks for the great review!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi <br />

    <br />

    Thanks for a great review.<br />

    <br />

    Does anybody know if the USB will work under Linux?<br />

    <br />

    BR Henrik Skare

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...