ralphfcooke Posted January 29, 2019 Share Posted January 29, 2019 It does seem a little strange that whenever someone make a change to their system, especially one with a significant cost involvement, that the result is almost always positive. Wouldn't it be more reasonable to assume the manufacturer has gone to some lengths to ensure their product performs at something approaching its optimum, in which case it would seem to me that there would be an even chance that changes would be negative? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now