crenca Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, Indydan said: So, Stone is enthusiastically promoting MQA as sounding better, knowing full well the people who will be listening to MQA files, do not matter. He is promoting MQA sound quality to end users, knowing full well all of the advantages of MQA are for the record labels. Hmmm... Just a suggestion; TAS should maybe now stand for "The Absolute Sham". Yea, but they always have an out, in that these trade publications will argue they are thinking of the "average" music lover - the man "stuck" with 128kbit streaming and would it not be wonderful for them to "upgrade" to MQA. Who can keep up with all the half-truths and convenient excuses Audiophiledom - like Roon saying they are "defaulting to the HiRes" in a Tidal sort even though MQA is not "HiRes" at all?! Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now