Jump to content
IGNORED

Why Classical Music Can’t Make Money from Streaming


Recommended Posts

Kirk writes <<For classical labels to be on a level playing field, their streams need to be paid differently from “songs"....[snip]... as the shift to streaming continues, it’s a good idea to not penalize these labels because of the nature of their recordings.>>

 

So, wouldn’t it be in their own best interest (Apple, Spotify, etc) to *want* to alter the mechanics of their deals with the classical labels, as you suggest? I mean, making *some* money from the classical labels is better than making none, and since this is, by comparison, such a minuscule part of the overall revenue of music, it would seem to me to a no-brainer to find that mutually-acceptable sweet-spot, where both sides can coexist, rather than streaming services letting classical music wither and die from their catalogs.

Link to comment

<< One-size-fits-all is a lot easier. >>

Makes sense. On the other hand, Apple is, perhaps second only to Disney, a mega-corporation which is extremely sensitive to its brand being squeaky-clean and societally progressive (witness the Taylor Swift turnaround & the Confederate flag business). Apple will surely not want to start having to respond to headlines of "Is Apple Single-Handedly Killing Classical Music?" (hyperbole, but such is a lot of the modern press). Even folks out there who don't personally like classical music understand that it is culturally important, and would not be positively disposed toward the possibility of its becoming a casualty of the new streaming dominance.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...