Jump to content
IGNORED

Cybershaft rubidium clock...low priced option?


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
Hahaha! Made me laugh. Trying to achieve low phase noise and then using a plug in XO... Also, does not the 575 achieve lower phase noise than the 950 at 100 MHz... At least that is what I see in published Crystek specs...

 

And actually, current production CCHD-575s, are well outperforming Crystal's own web published measurements. They sent us 3 samples of a mid-20s MHz rate, and they came with 3 individualized graphs--with 10Hz offset noise at -108, -110, and -112. I called and asked if those were hand picked and they said no, that they have just improved their process a great deal. Even Crystek's Sales Director could not give me a reason--other than ruggedness and installed clientele for the form factor--for the continuation of the 3 times the price CCHD-957 series.

(But I think Barrows knows all this already. ;))

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...