jdoleys Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 I took advantage offer used SATA MK II pachanko cable and I will try. If you notice improvement I want to get an update. I realize that companies like Nordost, Audioquest, among others do not have SATA cables in their portfolios. I also understand that if I do not see any improvement in sound quality in my setup, I can by no means generally testify that others will not try SATA cables. I have to say that I realize that 1 or 2 users must have some benefit in this space or are friends of the manufacturer. This fact is not unworthy and even part of the business, the game asks for tools. Link to comment
jdoleys Posted October 10, 2019 Share Posted October 10, 2019 First contact with "audiophile" SATA cable: Far from skepticism but to some degree suspicious since famous manufacturers do not have the accessory in their portfolios ... see Audioquest, Nordost and Siltech. Then came opportunity for me to buy at "reasonable" cost, the pachanko Sata MK II. The Considerations: - In SSD OS could not identify any changes; - In the library SSD I noticed the following: At first I thought the cable had made the sound brighter. But with very careful listening I realized that it brings more general clarity making the sound brighter and less intimate. It's not like taking off a blanket but maybe two sheets on the front of the speakers. The stage also grows aiding in the perception of subtle sounds. I liked the result. Think, one day update to Reference SATA Pachanko. Any compare this? Link to comment
jdoleys Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 A friend have a old model pachanko Sata, called "reference". He told me it is equal appearance MK II. Any know history old portifolio pachanko confirm this? Or was a unique model called "reference" in the past? Tks. Link to comment
jdoleys Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 My question is simple: if ever in the past was there a sata pachanko reference cable that looks the same as the current MK II? Link to comment
jdoleys Posted October 14, 2019 Share Posted October 14, 2019 Found it a "pure reference" with a good price. Now is wait and compare with MK II. Link to comment
jdoleys Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 In OS SSD nothing SQ changes with MK II, but in music library works so good ! After Pure Reference many configurations possibles. Job find best SQ. I believe is pure reference in music SSD and MK II in OS SSD, but every changes in some days when a test occours. Link to comment
jdoleys Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 I received a few hours ago a pure reference. Burning and artificial highs in this beginning of adaptation. This pure reference is much more hard to bend. Medium difficult install. Waiting burn in now Link to comment
jdoleys Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Using now mk2 in SO ssd and pure reference in library ssd. Cold sound, middle and treble very agressive, gain in transparency and clarity but decrease in naturality and warm. Link to comment
jdoleys Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 I have the MK II and the Pure Reference: they are very different. Pure here did not work on the data SSD. System has lost its naturalness. Pure made everything more digital and fatigue more remarkable. Leaves the sound airier, more open. for me, it's past the point. MK II in the data worked very well Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now