Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Mac Pro Quad Boot Reference Music Server

    quad-boot-thumb.jpgThe reference music server that goes to eleven! Last month I published my reference music server article that continues to draw a very large audience. To date the article has received 122 comments and thousands upon thousands of views. I also published an article on my initial Mac Pro configuration with OS X and Windows Vista. Since then I decided to take it up a notch. That's right, all the way to eleven. My Mac Pro now runs OS X Leopard, Windows XP Professional 32-bit, Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit, and openSUSE 11 (Linux). Whether or not this is the best of <s>both</s> four worlds remains to be seen. However there is no better way to test applications and sound quality across operating systems than using the identical hardware.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

     

     

     

    <center>

    <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/files/09222008/quad-boot-large.jpg"><img src="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/files/09222008/quad-boot-med.jpg" alt="Mac OS X Quad Boot Music Server"></a>

    </center><center>click to enlarge</center>

     

     

     

     

    <b>The Reference Music Server That Goes To 11</b>

     

    All of you are familiar with booting and rebooting your computer. That's a given. When Windows Vista was introduced more and more people started dual booting their computer with Vista and XP. This allows the user to select Windows XP or Windows Vista when the computer boots. If a user has applications that only work on XP but still wants to use Vista the cheapest solution is dual booting.

     

     

    When Apple switched to the Intel platform it included an application called Boot Camp with OS X. This application allows OS X users to dual boot into OS X and another Windows operating system like XP or Vista. The setup is very simple through the Boot Camp graphical user interface (GUI). Once OS X and Windows are installed on a Mac the user can select to run either operating system by holding down the Option key upon booting their Mac. Without holding down the Option key the Mac boots into OS X unless Windows is selected as the default startup disk.

     

     

    Here at Computer Audiophile there is no end to the different configurations needed when reviewing a product or conducting tests before publishing an article. In addition the only way to conduct apples-to-apples software tests is to use the exact same hardware. This left me with one option, quadruple booting a Mac Pro. Configuring a Mac Pro to quadruple boot is no easy task. If you're like me and you don't read instructions it is business as usual trying to quadruple boot. That's because there really aren't any instructions available. Bits and pieces of information are all over the Internet. I spent countless hours going back and forth between sites trying to put this puzzle together. Now that I've done it I could easily do it again fairly fast. Or maybe not. As usual I didn't write anything down during the laborious process of trial and error. Note: More error than anything else. With my quadruple booting Mac Pro I am presented the screen above (see photo) with the OS choices upon boot-up. If nothing is selected OS X will boot automatically. This is nice for me as OS X is my first choice for an operating system and I can reboot the music server remotely without user intervention.

     

    With four operating systems installed I should be able to test almost every media playback application available. Plus the Berkeley Audio Alpha DAC enables me to test for bit perfect output. As I <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/mac_pro_osx_windows_vista_ultimate_64_bit">mentioned previously</a> I have a host of applications lined up for testing. Right now I am listening to Jewel's album Spirit using MediaMonkey on Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit. And, I can say definitively I am getting bit perfect output (see photo below). There is no end to the Internet chatter about Windows Vista and the lack of audio quality. At least we have visual proof it can be bit perfect. This leads me to a topic that is currently being discussed in the forums. The sound signature of different applications. I can guarantee with 100% certainty that iTunes on OS X and MediaMonkey on Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit are bit perfect and DO NOT sound the same. Since my Mac Pro is running both operating systems and applications there are no hardware differences to obfuscate the results. Even the AIFF files were the same as I accessed the music off my Thecus 5200B Pro NAS unit. Sure both operating systems are different, but bit perfect is bit perfect. Or isn't it? To some these results make perfect sense. To others they make no sense. To me, I honestly have no idea. I certainly don't have all the answers but I will continue researching this topic. One thing I do know is that I enjoy listening to music on both systems. Isn't that what this is all about? Much more to come on this and related topics.

     

     

     

     

    <center>

    <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/files/09222008/bada-large.jpg"><img src="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/files/09222008/bada-small.jpg" alt="Mac OS X Quad Boot Music Server"></a>

    </center><center>click to enlarge</center>

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Thanks for your reply Chris,<br />

    You write: 'Macs have a built-in optical port to connect to a Jadis DAC, but optical is less than ideal.'<br />

    I was thinking of a AT&T (ST) optical port as used by Wadia and as far as I can hear the result is excellent.<br />

    I've tried the coax connection with Kimber 2020 and it's not as good.<br />

    I still don't get why one couldn't connect a Mac directly to a DAC eg Jadis JS1 or Wadia 9? That's what I would do with a Sooloos server thus bypassing the Sooloos DAC.<br />

    What do you think?<br />

    GM

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ah, the good ole Stick & Twist (ST) connector!<br />

    <br />

    I can't say I've ever seen an audio card for Mac with an ST output. <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Chris,<br />

    I'm probably very dense but I thought that you could bypass a Mac's soundcard ie having a direct connection from the HD to the external DAC. Is that possible?<br />

    As for the (glass) ST link, I know Macs don't have it but surely a mod is possible?<br />

    Thanks for a great site,<br />

    GM

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GM,<br />

    <br />

    What do you think is more important for having a good sound:<br />

    - a glass fiber with a ST-connector<br />

    - a bit perfect source with a jitter as low as possible.<br />

    <br />

    I think you better off with a excellent sound card like Lynx or RME and probably even better with a reclocker like dCS upsampler: <br />

    http://www.dcsltd.co.uk/<br />

    http://thewelltemperedcomputer.com/Intro/SoundQuality.htm<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Chris,<br />

    I've just looked at http://thewelltemperedcomputer.com/Intro/SoundQuality.htm<br />

    That's what I found:<br />

    'No sound card<br />

    If the audio stream is send to the USB or over Ethernet/Wlan to an external audio device, you don't need a sound card at all.<br />

    In case of USB you need a USB DAC.<br />

    If the audio is streamed over the network, you need a streaming media player.'<br />

    Yeah, 'if (...) you don't need a sound card at all.'<br />

    That's exactly what I want to do: get the digital stream into an external DAC bypassing the sound card.<br />

    And answering your question: I want both bit perfect output into a DAC AND (in order to achieve it better) an ST connection.<br />

    Surely, having both is not mutually exclusive.<br />

    So it seems that it is possible to output a bit perfect stream straight from the HD without using the inferior Mac sound card or any sound card.<br />

    Do you agree?<br />

    Thanks,<br />

    GM

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi GM - I think there is a terminology difference here that is contributing to some misunderstandings. Sometimes it's tough to discuss things with quick forum posts :-) Oh well.<br />

    <br />

    Exactly, there is no need for an internal soundcard. A traditional soundcard in a PC is just a DAC with a bunch of extra distorting options. A USB DAC or any DAC connected to a computer is really an external soundcard if you fit it into the traditional model. There are very few people on this site who actually use the internal soundcard on their computer. I can think of two :-) Almost everyone uses a digital I/O with a USB, FireWire, Optical S/PDIF, or Lynx HD26 interface. <br />

    <br />

    So, to accomplish your goal you will need a digital interface with the ST connection. If there is a card made for a computer with this interface you would be all set. I just can't think of any cards with this interface. There may be FierWire external devices that convert into an ST interface.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Chris,<br />

    You're absolutely right about a terminology difference leading to some misunderstandings!<br />

    So, thinking along the same lines as before, it seems that I can get a bit perfect stream from the existing Mac interface viz USB, Firewire, Optical SPDIF or Ethernet then feed it into my Jadis JS1 Mk3 DAC as long as I can get it modified to accept a USB, Firewire, Optical SPDIF or Ethernet 'signal'.<br />

    And probably better still: using an extra interface to reduce jitter eg a rubidium clock (expensive!) or a DCS clock (expensive!) or a Lynx interface... and forget the ST connection.<br />

    Have I got it all correct?<br />

    Thanks,<br />

    GM

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Very cool GM! Now we're talking the same language :-)<br />

    <br />

    I also looked at the input specs for your JS1 Mk3 and it appears to have an AES input. This is ideal. I sugges using a Lynx AES16e card in a Mac. This card has about 20 picoseconds of jitter and offers the ability to use an external clock like a rubidium or dCS if you want. So, the card can connect to your JS1 Mk3 via AES/EBU without any modifications to any equipment. Just purchase a Mac Pro desktop and a Lynx card. Then you're all set!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hello Chris,<br />

    OK, so I should get a MacPro + Lynx card + (touch)screen and connect it to my DAC.<br />

    Still if you would clarify a point.<br />

    Do I understand correctly that the main function of the Lynx I/O interface/card is to make sure I get as little jitter as possible? And a very high sampling rate?<br />

    If I didn't buy one could I connect the Mac to the DAC using the appropriate cable? With worse results?<br />

    Thanks,<br />

    GM

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi GM - My reference system includes a Mac Pro desktop and a Lynx AES16e card. I highly recommend this system.<br />

    <br />

    Yes, the main function of the Lynx card is very high quality digital output. This means, among other things, very low jitter and the capability to output sample rates up to 24/192.<br />

    <br />

    Without a Lynx card you can use the Mac's built-in optical port with a Mini-toslink to toslink cable. You'd get up to 24/96 resolution and suffer from the usual optical issues. If you go this route you could use a Mac Mini, MacBook, MacBook Pro, or a Mac Pro desktop. They all have built-in optical outputs.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hey GM. You don't need to spend mega bucks on a good external clock. If you want to clock the Lynx AES16e card, you can do this with a "pacecar" from empirical audio. I suggest you visit their site.. If you don't want to use the Lynx, Empirical has other ways of reducing jitter from a computer.........AB

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...