PlayClassics Truthful Recording Technology v1.1

[StephenJK]

Four months ago we opened a thread called: http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f8-general-forum/playclassics-master-file-giveaway-computer-audiophile-members-26426/

 

We offered everyone to download an album to try the sound of the Truthful Recording Technology on their systems. I want to thank everyone for taking the time to listen. That really was a wonderful experience.

 

We have developed a new calibration update (version 1.1) that we would like to share with you. We use a fixed setup to record everything. We only use two mics with no mixing or mastering. Our technology is all about calibrating the hall and the recording chain to be transparent. The better the calibration, the more transparent the setup will be.

 

All our albums have been updated with this new calibration. We have uploaded the new masters to our web page. Everyone is welcome to download this new version of their albums. Whether you got a gift code or you directly purchased the album please say so and I will be happy to send you a gift code to download this new version.

 

We will also continue to send gift codes to those of you who have not had the chance to try this yet.

 

PlayClassics, the art of true music

Musicstry Studios, discover the Truthful Recording Technology

 

Yes, I do recall the "giveaway" and when it meant I had to send a PM for a download code I elected not to do so. I'm deeply suspicious by nature and have always been wary of a "free gift".

 

If you would like people to enjoy samples of your recordings, then make them available as a download with no questions asked.

 

If your interest is with building a potential client list for commercial purposes, I'm not interested in that type of marketing approach.

 

Thank you.

[StephenJK]

What was the purpose of this post? If you don't want a free sample, don't ask for one. It's your choice, so stop whining about it.

 

Of course this giveaway is a marketing strategy. That doesn't mean there are any hidden strings attached.

 

 

The purpose was self-explanatory, and obviously beyond your understanding.

[StephenJK]

I see. You came here to antagonise people and be generally rude.

 

If you or anyone else would like to use a public forum for commercial purposes then please have the courtesy of being clear about your intentions.

 

Criticizing my post does not weaken my argument, nor does it lend any validity to yours.

[StephenJK]

If you read Mario's original post (that he also linked to above), you can see that his intention is crystal clear:

 

 

 

He also makes his commercial affiliation clear in his signature as per site rules.

 

Point made. I agree I was being a bit reactionary. My concern is that living in a digital world I'm cautious about whom I allow past the gates. Anyone wanting personal information needs a better reason than my being able to hear a song.

 

It's a different universe, and while we may be scattered off into wildly divergent directions, there's one thing that will never change. If I don't know you, I can't trust you.

[StephenJK]

You're already posting on this forum. No information beyond your nickname here was requested.

 

I don't know you. For some reason you seem to have appointed yourself as the moderator for this site. Anyone who disagrees with you seems to be wrong, and it's for you to explain that.

 

You get your wish, it's time to move on.