1 iaval Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 15 hours ago, MayInJune said: Which are the most important technical specifications published for audio gear THD+N, IMD, crosstalk, DR, S/N, crossover distortion, maximum load, output impedance, no-load voltage, load voltage, jitter, filtering, oversampling, frequency response to name a few 15 hours ago, MayInJune said: how would these measurements be audible in sq? THD+N (total harmonic distortion + noise) is basically how a pure sine wave is distorted from input to output, this distortion is visible of spectrum as additional harmonic content present along with the initial sine wave, and it's audible as roughness of individual tones, and manifest itself as harshness in percussion. Should be below 0.1% IMD, or intermodulation distortion is usually non issue, but it's basically mixing two different signals together and higher values would yet again show as harshness, especially in treble region. Should be below 0.1% Crosstalk is simply volume difference between channels. Lower values will mix channels together. It's impedance-dependent. Should be at least 50dB Dynamic range is the difference between loudest and quietest signal. At least 100dB for 24bit gear, 90dB as minimum. Signal to noise ratio, pretty much the same as DR, only towards noise. At least 100dB for 24bit gear, 90dB as minimum. Maximum load - minimum impedance allowed for amplifier. Should be 8 Ohm for HP amps and below 2 Ohm for speaker amps. Output impedance - resistance added by the amp towards transducer, should be as low as possible (minimum 1/8 of the impedance of the transducer). Below 2 Ohm for HP amps, below 1 Ohm for speakers. No-load voltage - peak voltage delivered by amp into infinite load. Useful for comparing low output impedance amps among each other. Load voltage - as above, however into known loads (250Ohm, 600Ohm, ...). With this, you can calculate maximum volume for your own set of HP/speakers. Jitter - highly dependent on the topology and nature of the signal Oversampling - how many times is the original sample rate raised to prevent ringing and aliasing errors - usually 128x or 256x Frequency response - which frequencies pass through the said device, at least all audible frequencies 20-20000Hz should be there, with maximum of 0.5dB difference in the baseband Filtering specifies parameters of the low-pass filter to prevent unwanted frequencies entering your signal chain. Mild ones include 24kHz LPF with 6dB/oct roll-off, sharper filters might introduce ringing. LPF is optional. Hope that answers at least part of your question MayInJune 1 Link to comment
0 iaval Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 4 hours ago, Ryan Berry said: most important measurements are weight and size and power consumption ☺️ The issue is not that manufacturers provide incorrect specs, but that their specs is often incomplete. Let's demonstrate it on my recent item of interest - Shanling M0: DAC ESS ES9218P Output power 80mW @ 32Ω Recommended headphone impedance 8 - 300Ω Frequency response 20Hz - 20kHz (-0.5dB) Distortion 0.004% (500mV) SNR 118dB Output impedance 0.16Ω Channels resolution 70dB Dynamic range > 105dB Up to 32bit 384kHz / DSD128 DAC - Okay, but other than to show off, that in itself won't guarantee anything. Even quality DAC will perform poorly in bad PCB layout Output power - listing just 80mW @ 32Ohm is not enough to have an idea how loud it's going to be with any headphone other than 32Ohm. Also missing under what THD+N was that 80mW achieved Recommended headphone impedance - useless (all headphones have different sensitivity, just by impedance it's impossible to draw conclusions) Distortion - we don't know the load and frequency response, good thing they at least mentioned the voltage SNR - 118dB - fine but again bandwidth would be helpful Output impedance - great, finally value we can use Channels resolution - bad translation? Might be crosstalk, in that case, very good. Dynamic range - again, missing bandwidth An example of "good enough" specification sheet would be Fiio X5II: http://www.fiio.net/en/products/41/parameters For that, Fiio gets a thumbs up. They even list the testing conditions. Ryan Berry 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now