audiventory Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 2 hours ago, Rounder44 said: I wonder if my losses from ripping with the above are perceivable with such a system? Of course I'll be upgrading over the years so planning for the future as well. Main aims of CD-ripping system are: maximal probability of correct error detection, minimal probability of wrong error detection, maximally correct restoration of damaged information. I'm CD-ripper developer. And, I don't know about modern CD ripper that guarantee 100% correct ripping: when ripped file is binary identical original record. As rule, for safe CD-ripping systems errors are corrected at 2 stages: into CD-drive (as far as I know, different implementations); into CD-ripper (different implementations). I.e. it is multistage process and result may depend on system [CD-drive+CD-ripper]. Unfortunatelly, I don't know about independent serious comparisons of CD-ripping systems. But, I think, that you needn't worry about the errors after safe ripping. Because, practically, audible errors are rare enough. Read details https://samplerateconverter.com/content/safe-audio-cd-ripping-technology Also you needn't worry about jitter, because, as rule, in audio system several asycronous FIFO buffers and stable clock generators. Read details here https://samplerateconverter.com/educational/what-is-jitter-audio Spacehound 1 AuI ConverteR 48x44 - HD audio converter/optimizer for DAC of high resolution files ISO, DSF, DFF (1-bit/D64/128/256/512/1024), wav, flac, aiff, alac, safe CD ripper to PCM/DSF, Seamless Album Conversion, AIFF, WAV, FLAC, DSF metadata editor, Mac & WindowsOffline conversion save energy and nature Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now