Jump to content

matthias

  • Content Count

    2473
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    Germany

Everything posted by matthias

  1. Which of the three Lush types did you try and in which configuration? Thanks Matt
  2. I modified all components with Neutrik PowerCon 32 A connectors which get power from a hard-wired distribution block powered by one AWG 5 cable. Matt
  3. Exactly these considerations let me stick to A 3.5 as long as possible. Since I use Audirvana for Qobuz only a second option will be Spotify Hifi. Matt
  4. Even worse, Spotify would lose all credibility....... Matt
  5. Agree, today they released a new version of the desktop app for Mac (1.1.64.561) but no Spotify HiFi in sight. It is a pity. Matt
  6. Maybe @Blackmorec knows the answer? Thanks Matt
  7. I apologise if this question has been addressed in this thread: Does InnuOS 2.0 support natively Spotify Connect? If yes, is it ready for Spotify Hifi? Thanks Matt
  8. I am really happy that I never subscribed to Roon in the past and never will do in the future. BTW, Darko is right. Matt
  9. Interesting,thar the new M1 Air is superior to the old MBP, thanks for sharing. I think the rapid inflation of the version numbers is made to demonstrate the progress of Audirvana with the new subscription model. Studio 1.5 makes a much better impression than Studio 1.0.5....... Matt
  10. Did you compare 3.5 and AS regarding SQ or musicality? Thanks Matt
  11. @Heckyman Just an additional question: Certainly you use the May in NOS mode and you might perform some additional upsampling in the Mac Mini M1. If you do so which software do you use for upsampling and do you upsample to PCM or DSD? Thanks Matt
  12. Thanks for sharing. I am just curious how May compares (from a musicality POV, not according to some audiophile terms) to the in-built DAC of the Mac Mini M1. Matt
  13. Which Mac player do you use for listening to Qobuz? Thanks Matt
  14. There is a complete thread about SQ of Studio on the Audirvana community forum: https://community.audirvana.com/t/sound-quality-studio-vs-3-5/26220 Matt
  15. Are you allowed to say something about the release? Will it be in summer or later? Thanks Matt
  16. Would be nice to share your experiences on the Audirvana Studio thread. Matt
  17. This discussion based on if bit-perfect then no SQ differences is obsolete. Matt
  18. Did you try direct USB out from Mac into DAC as well? Maybe Studio sounds better via upnp and 3.5 via USB? Thanks Matt
  19. This is a very valuable info. I am running so far 3.5 with High-Sierra and do streaming only, no local files. Matt
  20. Some do and find Studio less musical sounding. Matt
  21. Thank you for sharing, I am just wondering why some people on the Audirvana community forum describe this the other way around. Matt
  22. Jud, did you compare Studio vs. 3.5 without upsampling? Thanks Matt
  23. Is it possible that the tag imposes a sonic signature on the file as well? Matt
×
×
  • Create New...