Jump to content

Sonis

Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by Sonis

  1. As we all know, headphone listening has become big-business of late. As a subset of the major HiFi shows such as AXPONA and The Rocky Mountain show, there are now whole shows devoted solely to headphones and associated equipment. With such catchy show names as “Can-Jam” and “The HeadRoom Show”™, this market has become so large and so diverse, that such shows command large attendance and have enough exhibits to engage the enthusiast for the entire day. And the prices! Until quite recently, headphones were mostly in the sub $1000 price range. You had to buy a pair of Stax or Sennheiser Orpheus electrostatics to get above that figure. Now, there are many headphone models above $3K and people will pay it for quality sound reproduction. Along with the phones themselves, there are literally hundreds of stand-alone amplifiers available at all price points as people start to notice that the headphone jacks added to preamps, CD players, and receivers are simply not up to the performance of today's better headphones. Since many headphone lovers like their music on the go, there is also a growing market for stand-alone portable amplifiers to improve the sound available through portable devices such as smart phones and music players. Not a novice to this market segment is the British firm of iFi. Known for the innovative packaging of their high-performance, reasonable cost audio components, they have had several portable headphone amps in their lineup. The newest amplifier-only member of the iFi team is the US$299.00 xCan which along with it's sibling the xDSD initiate the launch of the x-line of components from the company. The xCan is designed to amplify the analog signal from one's smart phone or music player while the xDSD is a DAC plus an amplifier designed to play Linear PCM as well as Direct Stream Digital files. While the xCan is sold as an amplifier, it will decode 16-bit, 44.1 KHz digital audio by way of its Bluetooth capability via an onboard DAC. Both of the current x-line members have very similar looks and are exactly the same size, that is to say, both are 95 mm or 3.74” (l) X 67 mm or 2.64” (w) X 19 mm and 0.75” (h) and both weigh a similar amount at 127 grams for the xCan and 128 grams for the xDSD. The xCan sports this handsome high-gloss “black-chrome” finish with a longitudinal scalloped look and has all controls and I/O on the end bells of the enclosure in true iFi fashion. The xCan has a large knob-like volume control on one end of the unit which, with its coaxially located button, doubles as a function switch as well as offering power on-off duties while also switching between wired and wireless input modes. There are also switch controls to the right of the volume control/function switch to select between what iFi calls “3D+” and “XBass II” filter functions. 3D+ seems to bring a portion of the midrange forward to enhance “presence” and the Xbass II boosts the low end of the audio spectrum and this could enhance listener enjoyment with some headphone types. There are two jacks on the opposite end of the unit from the end with the large volume knob. One is a single 3.5 mm socket and the other a 2.5 mm connector. The larger jack is a single ended input that can be plugged directly into a music player or a smartphone and the smaller one is for balanced inputs such as that available on a Pono player. On the same end as the volume control, and to the right of it. Are another pair of phone plugs, and again the big one (3.5mm) is for single-ended phones while the smaller of the two is intended for balanced phones (although I don't know of any headphone manufacturer who use the 2.5mm plug format for balanced 'phones). In the box that the xCan comes packaged, there are two short, 6-inch long cables; one with 3.5mm male connectors at each end and another with 2.5mm connectors. These are used to connect to one's player in either the balanced or the unbalanced mode. Connecting the xCan To A Player All that is required is for the user to choose the proper interconnect cable from the two provided, and connect the headphone (or line-level, if available) output of one's player to the appropriate input on the xCan. The cases on most players are flat and I would have much preferred that iFi had left at least one face of the xCan flat because the scalloped body, while attractive, makes it difficult to confidently physically attach the two securely using the supplied Velcro-like strips. The unit is charged through one of the new USB “C” connectors, which is located on the output end of the xCan. The unit comes with a very short 6” USB “A” male to USB “C” male cable. This cable is designed to connect the xCan with a USB power source to charge the battery. Ifi specifies battery capacity at 18 hours via the unit's wired inputs and 12 hours when using Bluetooth. I applaud the USB-C connector's design because it, like the Apple Lightning connector, is reversible and can be plugged into the female socket either way. Listening is Believing I have two players that I use with the xCan. One is the Apple iPod Mini and the other is a HiFiMan SuperMini player. I also own an iPhone 6S and a current 9.5” iPad. The two players, the iPod and the HiFiMan are connected to the xCan via their headphone jacks while the iPhone and the iPad are connected via Bluetooth. The two players are not Bluetooth compliant, and the iPod has only a headphone-out 3.5mm jack. The HiFiMan SuperMini does have a balanced headphone jack output as well as a non-balanced one, but the jack is the larger 3.5mm type and the balanced cable on the xCan uses a 2.5mm plug, so I was unable to try that. I did the majority of my 16-bit listening on both the iPod and the iPhone, while I played my high resolution files via the HiFiMan SuperMini. I did listen to 16-bit/44.1 KHz recordings and MP3 Internet radio (such as Boston's WCRB which is 192 kbps MP3) as well as BBC3 from England (which is streamed as the Apple Lossless Audio codec (ALA) format) via Bluetooth. Syncing the iPhone 6S with the xCan was a snap. All one has to do is hold down the button top the right of the volume control on the xCan, with the device to be paired with in close proximity (in my case an iPhone 6S) until the device with which one is pairing acknowledges that it is pairing with the iFi xCan. After pairing is accomplished, to connect the two just turn-on the xCan and press and hold the power button until the center turns blue and is not flashing. That's it! The bluetooth equipped player is now playing wirelessly through the xCan. I was pleasantly surprised at how good the Bluetooth connection sounded. It was essentially the same as it is wired. According to iFi, the xCan has dual-mono amplifiers. They claim that each is capable of 1000mw (that's 1 Watt, into a 32Ω load). That translates into loads of volume with just about any headphones, earphones or earbuds (including the 300Ω Sennheiser HD-300). This certainly applies to the HiFiMan Ananda headphones that I'm currently using. The xCan can drive these phones to ear-damaging volume levels. No matter how loud you like your music, the xCan headphone amplifier can accommodate you – and more! Switching on the xCan is accomplished by pushing the frosty, translucent center on the volume control. Push and hold the button until the LED behind the button lights up. The xCan will always come-up in the last mode used. If you wish to remain in the last mode you used, simply release the button. If you want to cycle through the available modes, keep holding the button down. The LED display will change color as it cycles through the following modes: Green is for wired input (either balanced or unbalanced), Blue is for Bluetooth (connected), Flashing Blue (indicates that the unit awaiting wireless Bluetooth connection) and alternate Red/Blue flashing (means wireless Bluetooth pairing). Also the volume control will change color (in the same center translucent window as the mode indicator) as volume is advanced. Green is for low volume all the way to Red when the volume is high. Watch out. If you have really efficient headphones, one full watt can cause serious hearing damage! In the interest of a comprehensive review, I listened both with and without the two filter modes; the 3D+ and the XBassII. I found that I did not care for either mode, and preferred to listen with the amplifier set “flat” (more about this later). Of course your requirements and tastes could be quite different from mine so try both, either separately or in combination. The same button that selects these two modes (or both) also works to pair the xCan with Bluetooth. Somewhat confusing (to this reviewer, anyway), the 3D+ and Xbass II switch is repeated on the opposite end of the xCan as a toggle. It selects between Xbass II, 3D+ or both no matter how the buttons on the volume control end of the unit are selected. I have no idea why this seeming redundancy exists. Using the xCan with my iPhone 6S, I tried Amazon Music, Spotify (paid), and Apple Music. I was impressed with the clean, low distortion presentation of the xCan even when connected, either via the iPhone's unbalanced headphone jack or via Bluetooth. Switching to my HiFiMan SuperMini, I played the 24-bit, 176.4 KHz Reference Recording of Stravinsky's “Rite Of Spring” with Eiji Oue and the Minnesota Orchestra on Reference HRX #HR-70. The quadruple-f crescendi in this work are a real test of equipment and the xCan amplifier sounded spectacular reproducing them! The high frequency quality of the xCan is impressive, with no hint of harmonic or intermodulation distortion in the upper registers. The air around instruments was palpable whether listening with the HiFiMan Anandas or the Shure SE112 In-Ear isolating headphones. The low frequency performance is nothing short of spectacular! Through the HiFiMan Anandas, like the entire HiFiMan headphone line, the bass performance is superb. The xCan amplifier reproduces my favorite low-frequency note, the opening chord (double low-C on double basses, contrabassoon and pipe organ) in Richard Strauss' “Also Sprach Zarathustra” with Andre Previn conducting the Vienna Philharmonic (Telarc CD-80167) like I've never heard it before played on a portable device. It is loud, deep and clean. The rest of the amp's performance is likewise incredibly clean and transparent. I did find one recording where the 3D+ mode worked to an advantage. “Gordon Lightfoot's Greatest Hits” (Rhino/Warner Brothers B00005YW4N), Gord's voice kind of gets swallowed by the accompaniment on several tracks and invoking the 3D+ mode brought him more front-and-center. So I guess these two “filter” modes can be useful, even to purists (read that: “audio snobs”) like me! Conclusion There are quite a few outboard headphone amps available for quality portable listening and I've heard many of them. The only headphone amplifier that I have heard that betters the iFi xCan for playback quality is the amp section of the US$2800 Hugo II DAC/Amp from Chord. I cannot recommend the xCan amplifier too highly. It sounds great, will drive most headphones to the threshold of pain (and in some cases, well beyond it), and it doesn't cost an arm and a leg. You'll want to connect it via the supplied cables for playback of 24-bit, 96 KHz (or higher resolution) fare, but to listen to MP3 or CD quality music, pairing the xCan with one's player via Bluetooth (assuming the player has that function) will give you maximum flexibility. You can put a cell phone or music player in one pocket or one's purse, with the xCan in another pocket or on one of those arm bands that you often see runners wearing. Of course you can always “Velcro” the player and amp together, just don't be surprised if they don't stay together too well. Those flutes on the side of the xCan are deep enough to impair the bonding of the Velcro-like strips that iFi includes for that purpose. Product Information: iFi Audio xCAN ($299) xCAN Product Page xCAN Tech Notes xCAN User Manual xCAN vs xDSD
  2. Electrostatic headphones have been with us for a long time. The Japanese company Stax (not to be confused with the record label) started making stereophonic ES 'phones with the introduction of the SR-1 in 1960 and by the late sixties, Koss was making their flagship model, the ESP-9. I had a pair of these puppies and found them wanting. While Stax was selling a system consisting of a a pair of phones and a combination tube amplifier and a polarizing power supply designed to be fed audio from a line-level input, the Koss ESP-9s had only the power supply. The audio was supplied by one's power amplifier. One connected said amplifier to the Koss box and then connected one's stereo speakers to that box as well. To listen to phones, one interrupted one's feed to the speakers with a switch on the front of the Koss box. Not a great way to power headphones, especially if one was using heavy speaker cables. They would pull the light Koss energizer right off the table. The ESP-9s sounded OK (and I wonder if I would still find that to be the case?) but they were heavy, bulky and with their oil-filled soft vinyl ear cups and closed backs, they would be uncomfortably warm to wear after a while. Meanwhile Stax was making relatively light and comfortable open back ES 'phones, but they were pretty expensive (and still are). Today, Koss makes more headphone models than anyone, including the ESP-950, which is a light, open-backed and comfortable looking electrostatic headphone system. I've never seen a pair in the flesh, but they have good reviews and they are certainly less expensive than most of the competition at $999. I have never been a great fan of headphone listening, preferring instead to do my listening with loudspeakers. Though I've always had several pairs around, I generally used them only when I needed to not disturb others or when mixing a recording. I still have a pair of Koss Pro-4A's for location recording because they are closed-back and have great ear sealing capability. They really attenuate the outside noise and let me concentrate on what's coming in through the microphones. Today, however, headphone listening has become a major mode of listening to music for several generations of music lovers. Spurred, I believe by the fact that most younger listeners get all their music from iPod-like players, pads and smart phones, the industry has seen an explosion of new and old companies producing headphones operating on a number of different principles from the traditional small speaker cone in each earcup to the isodynamic or planar magnetic principle to electrostatics. For many years in the 80's, 90's and two-thousands, if one wanted electrostatic headphones, one pretty much needed to go to Stax or to Koss as they were the only game in town. Today, there are so many electrostatic headphones being made that it's hard to keep track of them. Many new companies have started building this type of 'phone at almost all price points from the low end characterized by Voza and Cybersound with their electret designs (starting around $170), to the Warwick Acoustics Sonoma ES headphone system at at $4995 all the way up to the HiFiMan's $50,000 “Shangra-La” headphone system. HiFiMan's Jade II Electrostatic Headphone System We are interested today in a new moderately priced full electrostatic headphone system from HiFiMan called the Jade II. HiFiMan's first product was, in fact, a short-lived ES design called the Jade, but Dr. Fang Bian soon decided to concentrate his efforts on planar magnetic or “isodynamic” designs instead and the original Jades fell by the wayside. About two years ago, the company surprised the industry by introducing a state-of-the-art, cost is no object electrostatic headphone system dubbed the “Shangri-La”. This system came with a huge combination polarizing power supply and tube-based amplifier. The amplifier uses four “Western Electric” 300B tubes (two per channel) and four smaller driver tubes (6SN7s). The 300Bs are directly heated (no separate heater, the filament is the cathode) triodes which were developed in the late 1920's for long-distance telephone amplification and are still prized today by SET fans for their incredibly pure sound. HiFiMan says that there is nothing between the 300Bs and the headphones, no transformers and no capacitors, and thus one hears to pure sound of the these remarkable (and expensive) tubes. Later, and for considerably less ($8000), the company released the “Shangri-La” Jr. Also tube-based, this amplifier used four matched 6SN7s to power the headphones. Now the company has released the very affordable ($2499 US) Jade II electrostatic 'phone system. These phones are all solid state with FETs driving the audio to the 'phones. First Look The Jade II's arrived at my door (from China) in a very large outer box and two smaller inner-boxes. One box contained the headphone set and the other the amplifier/energizer unit. The headset is the by-now familiar HiFiMan roughly anatomical ear shape and has the newer, simpler headband configuration. I.E., the earcups do not swivel right to left as in earlier HiFiMan designs, only back and forth. The first thing one notices about the headphone set is how light it is when compared to HiFiMan's premium planar-magnetic offerings. At less than 13 ounces (365 grams), the Jade II's are among the lightest full-sized 'phones this reviewer has ever tried. This lightness leads to a wearer comfort that allows for multi-hour listening sessions without neck muscles getting stiff! This is a real advantage and when coupled with very comfortable ear pads comprised of a breathable material, it means no ear sweating when listening over a long term as well. The six-foot cord is terminated with the industry-standard five pin plug, which means that if one already has a pair of Stax headphones one can use Jade II's as an extra pair of 'phones with that system's energizer/amplifier. One can also use the headset with the Woo Electrostatic headphone energizer/amplifiers and energizers as well as the iFI “Pro iESL” energizer. For this reason HiFiMan sells the Jade II headset separately, for $1399. While the Jade II's headset is light, the amplifier/energizer is not. At 14.3 lbs or 6.5 KG, it consists of a black anodized, CNC machined outer surround and an oval inner case nestled inside. The overall measurements are 10.9” X 10.6” X 4.6” (276mm X 270mm X116mm). The amp has two standard electrostatic headphone connectors on the front along with a push-button on-off switch, a push switch to select between balanced and non-balanced inputs and a stepped volume control which controls both pairs of headphone jacks simultaneously. There is no provision for balance between right and left nor are the two output jacks individually adjustable for volume. On the back is an IEC power cable connector and a pair of XLR balanced inputs flanked by a pair of gold-plated unbalanced RCA jacks. Connecting The Jade II's to My Audio System As mentioned, the Jade II energizer/amplifier can be connected to one's system by either unbalanced RCAs or via balanced XLRs. Since I have XLR outputs on my DAC (a Schiit Yggdrasil) and there is a definite advantage to having the headphone's controls next to my listening chair (on the other side of the room from the equipment shelves) I decided to use XLRs to connect my system to the Jade II. I have lots of XLR mike cables of different lengths and most are color-coded right and left with red and white tape wrapped around the connector barrels on both ends, so I decided to “borrow” a pair from my recording stash that was long enough to stretch from my DAC around the periphery of my listening room to a table beside my listening chair. All of my digital sources, ranging from the audio stream served from my computer in my office, to Internet radio from my Logitech Squeezebox Touch to CDs and SACDs and audio Blu-Rays played on my Oppo UDP-205 “media center” as well as DAT tapes played on my Otari DAT recorder lead to the Yiggy. This is done to get the most consistent digital sound from all sources. Thus connected, I could play everything (save LPs) into the Jade II amplifier and control the volume from where I sit. The only problem with this scheme is that the Yiggy does not have a remote control (and believe me it needs one!), but I solved that problem with a broomstick! I found that a broomstick would just reach the Yiggy's source selector button if I leaned forward in my listening chair, so I went to the home depot and bought a length of wooden dowel to use to select which digital input I wanted! I keep it next to my chair at all times. Listening to the Jade II's Anyone buying a pair of Jade II's should not expect great sound when you put them on for the first time. Fresh out of the box, the 'phones sound very restricted in dynamic contrasts as well as presenting a fairly narrow soundstage. These phones definitely need about 100 hours of “breaking-in” before sounding their best. The reason for this is that the sound producing element is an extremely thin diaphragm of some proprietary plastic material that is stretched very tightly over the supporting frame between the two perforated stator plates. This diaphragm must stretch a bit to loosen it enough to have the travel necessary to give the best sound. My advice is to turn on a digital radio station and pack the headset in pillows so you don't have to listen to the 'phones as they break-in over four or five days of constant playing. Just let them play for about a week before doing any serious evaluation of their sound. Bass performance With the Jade II's fully settled-in, the first thing I noticed was the absolute lack of distortion of any kind. Most of us are so used to the types of distortion produced by most transducers, that we don't even think about it. We don't really notice it at all... until it's not there anymore! This is especially true of low frequency distortion, which most of us just take for granted because it is present in greater or lesser extents in virtually all cone based woofers. The Jade II's follow in the general HiFiMan tradition of having great bass extension. HiFiMan's published specs for the Jade II's is that they go down to 7 Hz (although this is without the limits being defined). Irrespective of how many dB down these 'phones are at 7 Hz, in the low 20 Hz region the bass is prodigious for a pair of headphones. More than just the quantity of bass present, the Jade II's have exceptionally clean bass. Listening to Saint-Saens Symphony #3 in C minor, OP78, the “Organ” symphony with Micheal Stern and the Kansas City Symphony (Reference Recordings RR-136), I was struck with not only the power and depth, but the clean delineation of the full C Major chord when the organ sounds-in in the second movement. I know this work well, yet I was still startled by the pedal chord when it started. Even with good subwoofers, capable of shaking the house foundations, I have never heard the organ work in this composition with such authority and cleanliness of presentation. Most headphones tend to double at these frequencies, especially if the low frequency notes are very loud. The Jade II's do not double and maintain a linear pistonic action to the very bottom of whatever is recorded. Transient Response Transient attacks are what one should expect from a small electrostatic transducer, but rarely hears. I have a recording that I made with a Zoom H6 hand-held recorder using MS microphone module that comes with the recorder. The recording was 24-bit/96 KHz and was made at a local night club. It consisted of solo “flamenco” guitar and an elaborate percussion ensemble. Through my hybrid electrostatic speakers and through my numerous pairs of dynamic headphones, the rim shots on the snare drum are, indeed, impressive, but through the Jade II's they are nothing less than electrifying! The attack is startling and the rim shot stops as quickly as it starts. I have listened to this recording countless times through my HiFiMan “Edition -X, v.2” planar magnetic phones and they didn't have the realistic spped or impact of the Jade II's. I put this down to the ultra thin (less than one micron) diaphragm that HiFiMan employs. This all but massless membrane is able to accelerate and stop much faster than would phones employing more conventional diaphragm materials such as thin Mylar. The Edition X's, I believe, are slowed down by the need to have a current-carrying “voice grid” applied to the diaphragm. So, irrespective of how thin the diaphragm material, there is going to always be the added mass of the voice grid. Electrostatic phones' diaphragms, which have a molecule-thick conductive coating “vacuum sputtered” evenly over their entire surface, don't need this extra mass and thus can accelerate and stop much faster. Midrange and High Frequency Performance As good as the Jade II's are at the bottom of the audio spectrum, and as good as they are in the transient response department, the 'phones present a basically uncolored midrange as well. Brass instruments sound just right and have the bite one associates with the real thing; something that is rarely present with the best loudspeakers, much less headphones. Also, I have never heard cleaner highs. The advertised Jade II high frequency extension,which is said to reach out to 90 KHz (!) is hardly relevant to the reproduction of music, but it does speak for a smooth and extended treble region, free of the peakiness often encountered with dynamic phones as they reach their high-frequency resonant point. Obviously a headphone system that has response out to 90 KHz is going to have a diaphragm resonance that is way above the audible band pass. Soundstage and Imaging Finally, I'd like to comment on soundstage. This may seem like a strange thing to discuss when evaluating headphones because we've all come to expect any imaging produced by a pair of headphones to be inside of our heads. I expected no more or no less when I first donned this pair of Jade II's and to be honest, I was not disappointed. The soundstage was indeed in my head just as I expected. But, after giving them a hundred hours of break-in, I was flabbergasted to find that these phones actually image in a much more speaker-like manner than any headphone set that I had ever experienced before! For the first time the image was outside of my head and in front of me. I realize that it's an illusion, but it is a very satisfying one! If one keeps one's head relatively still, the soundstage that one hears is stable with great image specificity and a wide deep presentation. You'll not be fooled into thinking that you are listening to stereo speakers, But it will be such a breath of fresh air after living with ordinary headphones, that you won't really care. Practical Considerations At $2499 (US) there is no doubt that the HiFiMan Jade II electrostatic headphone system is a bargain. The nearest quality electrostatic competitor is the Stax combination of the SR-007A MKII at a bit over $1800 (from Amazon) and the matching Stax SRM-007TA SRM-007TII driver unit/headphone amplifier at slightly more than $1400 (again from Amazon and imported by them directly from Japan as are the headphones) for a grand total of around $3200. Even though this price isn't bad, considering that planar-magnetic units from HiFiMan, Audeze, and others can cost far more than that, Still, the Jade II's modest price is very tempting, especially in light of their stellar performance. Since the Jade II's use the same headset connector as do Stax headphones, if one needs an extension cord, one can purchase the 6 Ft extension for Stax phones, but be advised that such an extension is over a hundred dollars from Amazon. XLR terminated microphone cable is much cheaper and allows one to place one's Jade II system next to one's listening position, obviating the need for an expensive headphone extension. Conclusions With the introduction of the Jade II electrostatic headphone system from HiFiMan, the performance bar for high quality electrostatic headphones has been raised and simultaneously, the price bar has been lowered. One can spend much more that the $2499 for a pair of magnetic phones that sound nowhere near as good as the Jade II's. Keeping in mind that they won't sound their best until until they have about 100 hours under their belt, one simply cannot go wrong making the HiFiMan Jade II headphones one's next high-end expenditure. Product Information: Jade II Electrostatic Headphone and Amplifier ($2,499) Jade II Electrostatic Headphone only ($1,399) Electrostatic Headphone Amplifier only ($1,599) Jade II Product Page Where To Buy: HIFIMAN Direct Customer Service Number: +1(201) 443-4626
  3. Lumin advertises the U1 as a “Network Transport” for those audiophiles who already have a DAC with which they are satisfied. It is compatible with all the major services and formats including PCM from 44.1 KHz sampling rate all the way to 768 KHz and bit depths from 16 to 32-bit and DSD 512 to 22.5. The U1 joins a growing lineup of high-end products from this Chinese-based company that includes a line of full “Network Players” that contain a Network Transport as well as a built-in DAC. Lumin also has a pair of power amplifiers in its “stable” as well as a Music Library Storage solution and a Smart Application which allows the user of the transports and players to completely control them form a tablet or smart phone running either the Apple iOS or Google's Android OS. Physical Characteristics The U1 comes in two units: The main “Transport” and a separate PSU (Power Supply Unit). Both units are available in either a brushed silver aluminum finish or a black brushed aluminum finish. Our review sample is black. The Power Supply A separate power supply unit is unusual these days and requires an umbilical cord to connect to the main transport unit. The PSU contains two toroidal power transformers. Lumin believes that separating the power from the signal circuitry results in better audio performance. The PSU measures 100mm (4 inches) W X 315mm (12.4 inches) D X 55mm (2 inches) H and weighs 2 Kg (4.4 pounds). There is but a single button on the front which is illuminated to show that the unit is switched on. The back contains but a round multi-pin connector for the umbilical to the main unit. The Main Transport The main unit or “transport” as Lumin calls it, is characterized as a “monolith-like” enclosure with an elegantly curved front and a recessed cutout in the center for a vacuum fluorescent display. There are no controls on the front panel of the U1. The enclosure measures 350mm (13.7 inches) W X 345mm (3.16 inches) D X 60mm (2.37 inches) H, and weighs in a hefty 8 Kg (17.64 pounds). The rear panel of the Lumin is rather inexplicably recessed a good 2 inches (55mm) making it unnecessarily difficult to get to when installing the U1 into one's system. Aside from that the unit is very well laid out in back. Starting from the left, we have a small reset button, then for the input to the unit, an RJ45 jack for CAT 5 or CAT 6 Ethernet cable, then a gold-plated “earth” (ground) post. The ouputs, ostensibly to a DAC, consist of two Type “A” USB connectors, a Toslink SPDIF, a gold-played RCA coaxial SPDIF, and a BNC coaxial SPDIF. These are followed by a Cannon/XLR AES/EBU output. Finally there is a circular 7-pin connector for the DC umbilical cable from the PSU. Streaming Protocols Since the Lumin U1 is a music transport, it naturally must conform to and support the major protocols available to today's “digital audiophiles.” These include the UPnP A/V protocol with the streaming extension. The unit is Roon Ready and supports TIDAL, can connect directly to Spotify, supports Apple AirPlay, gapless playback as well as the on-device playlist. The U1 has full support for MQA from TIDAL, Qobuz, and Tune-in Radio. On the separately downloaded (but free) smart application, the unit supports both TIDAL and Qobuz icons to indicate high-resolution programming. It also allows for the control of volume in the digital domain, sports a sophisticated search function, allows for high-resolution artwork from one's sources and artwork caching. The application will handle multiple file tags and allows multiple tags and composer tags. The app also enables albums to be grouped together in response to several grouping options in the playlist and provides automatic internet links to either artists, albums or individual works/songs. Playlists can be saved and restored in case of an accidental deletion. I cannot emphasize too strongly that the app, which is available for both iOS and Android devices and downloaded from Lumin's website is de rigueur rather than optional as it is on many such devices. It would be impossible to operate this device without it. Setup Connecting the Lumin U1 to one's system couldn't be more straightforward. I connected a 50 ft CAT6 cable to my wireless router next to my main computer. The other end, I plugged into the RJ45 connector on the back of the U1. I then connected the umbilical cable from the PSU to the back of the Lumin, and connected a 0.5 meter XLR cable from the AES/EBU output connector on the rear of the U1 to the AES/EBU input on the Schiit Yggdrasil DAC. I then downloaded and installed the Application on my Android tablet (the app will run on most Android devices and any Apple iPad or iPhone manufactured since 2014). Upon launching the app it connected immediately with the Lumin and the interface is so intuitive that it becomes immediately apparent what needs to be done to access one's locally stored music on one's computer or NAS (Network Attached Storage) device. At this point it is advisable to explore the app (there are no instructions that I can find for the application). You will soon figure out how to access TIDAL, Spotify, and Qobuz and your own locally stored music files. I had pre-USA rollout access to Qobuz and I have a Spotify account. I was able to quickly setup a playlist containing a combination of streaming files from Qobuz (Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto #1 in B minor, Sviatoslav Richter, Herbert von Karajan and the Berlin Philharmonic) and Spotify (my favorite Roy Orbison songs) and a number high resolution files from my main computer: Albinez “Iberia” and piano works from Debussy on the PlayClassics label. I was able to queue these disparate sources and change their playing order at will as well as save the playlist to be able to repeat it at any time. Any single playlist will support up to 2000 tracks with “cover art” icons and icons to indicate the files' streaming source such as TIDAL MQA or Qobuz “Sublime High-Res.” The app allows the operator to drag files around to re-order them and to edit individual tracks or even entire albums. One's personal library can be arranged by track title, album title, artist, composer, genre, date added to library, etc. The app contains a search function that allows the library to be searched in two ways: a simple “find” function or using a set of filtering criteria. It also enables the user to search both TIDAL and Qobuz catalogs directly. There are many more features of this remarkable interface, too many to list here. But one will quickly find them by merely poking around. Sound Quality OK, I'm firmly in the “bits-is-bits” camp when it comes to talking sound quality from what is essentially a purely digital signal. And I would have said that the Lumin U1 would have the same sound as a NAD or a Pioneer or any other music server “client.” After all, the only thing that comes out of the device is “bits!” Well, I was wrong. I have two other devices in my system that do (to a certain extent) what the Lumin U1 does. I have an Oppo 205 and a Logitech Squeezebox Touch. Both feed the Yggdrasil DAC so the only difference should be the source component. If bits were indeed bits then the same program material would yield the same sound from each source. It ain't so! Compared to the digital output of the Oppo or the Logitech device, the U1 was, well, just better! First of all, the top octaves were cleaner and more delineated. The 24/96 PlayClassics files of Albeniz' Iberia played by Luis Grane and Angel Cabrera playing Debussy are exemplary performances of solo piano. The recordings are both first rate and with a decent system the sound is almost as if the pianos are in the room with the listener. When streamed from my Mac Mini where the files are stored, they can be played through the Logitech, the Oppo or the Lumin. While excellent through any of these devices, the Lumin seem to delineate the transients better than the other two and the pianos seem to have more “space” around them. To make sure the digital interface wasn't making differences where none actually exist, I re-connected all three devices via coaxial SPDIF to the DAC. The noted differences as well as the sonic superiority of the U1 was still there. Another further improvement over the other digital server clients that I noticed was that while the other two units threw an image that started at the speaker plane and went back beyond the wall, there was nothing forward of the speaker plane. The Lumin U1 somehow brought the entire presentation forward as well as back, giving a three dimensional quality to the imaging that simply was absent from the others. I do not know to what to attribute this, but a friend of mine noticed the same phenomenon and mentioned it before I had said anything. It's there alright. Conclusion The Lumin U1 is a beautifully made superbly engineered “music transport.” It supports basically all formats and streaming service in use today. While it supports MQA on TIDAL, I don't have access to that service and therefore wasn't able to test that function, but none-the-less, the sound the U1 elicits from these ones-and-zeros is definitely a cut above many other similar devices. The Lumin application is the best of its type that I have encountered. With it loaded on a tablet or a smartphone, the world of streaming music is a real joy. It works so well and is so intuitive that once you use it, you'll wonder how you ever got by without it. I was sorry to delete it from my Android tablet but the Lumin had to go back. My only real complaint is the machine case top's extreme overhang in the rear. It makes it very difficult, once the unit is installed in a system to access the rear connections. If I owned one I'd be very tempted to take a band-saw to the machined CNC case top and I encourage Lumin to re-think that particular design decision. The Lumin U1 is not cheap at close to US$6000, but it is definitely a very high performance unit. Luckily, Lumin sells a smaller unit with less expensive casework, a built-in power supply and with LPCM support to only 384 KHz instead of 768. Capabilities, otherwise seem similar and its only US$2000. Additional Information: Manufacturer: Lumin Product: U1 Audiophile Streaming Transport ($5,900) Quick Start Guide: LINK Hardware Settings: LINK App Usage: LINK Contact: LINK
×
×
  • Create New...