Jump to content

Urs

  • Content Count

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Urs

  • Rank
    Freshman Member

Personal Information

  • Location
    Switzerland

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Excellent!!! I read the post. User Omid at avnirvana is right. I also checked the correct syntax here: http://convolver.sourceforge.net/configegs.html I edited my *.cfg file accordingly. It works now as expected, i.e. same behaviour/improvement in Roon as I have in J.River. @asdf1000Thank you very much. 🙂
  2. I am using the latest Audiolense XO version. I have passive speakers (2.0 Stereo). I am using a miniDSP UMIK2 microphone. Speaker measurement went well. For filter measurement I used the default (True Time Domain). I experimented with several target curves and ended up with one which I really like. I created appropriate filters: a set of *.cfg and *.wav files for J.River as well as the corresponding *.zip file for using in Roon. This means the convolution filter in J.River and the convolution filter in Roon are based on the same measurement, filter (TTD) and target, but... now comes my issue:
  3. Here comes my proposal: Genelec The Ones. Either 8341A or 8351B It has two big advantages: single point source (treble, midrange and bass). This means you can sit very closely to them (starting from ca 0.4m for the 8341 and from ca 0.5m for the 8351B) built-in digital room correction, i.e. you will use the Genelec GLM software. Even if the listening distance is short, the room correction has a huge influence. You can easily validate this by bypassing the room correction. What I would highly recommend in addition: use the digital input and not the analog.
  4. This is how I compare DACs or more precisely: (DAC A + Ethernet Roon Endpoint A) vs. (DAC B + Ethernet Roon Endpoint B) Equipment: Benchmark HPA4 Preamp/headphone amp with its remote control Sennheiser HD 800S headphones Preparation: create a Roon group, which contains Enpoint A and Endpoint B carefully adjust output levels of DAC A and DAC B (if necessary slight usage of the HPA4's input boost function) HPA4: activate the two used inputs, deactivate the unused inputs. Test Procedure: Start a test track Press "next input
  5. I went for the Sonore Signature Rendu SE optical and received it a few weeks ago. The combination DA2 V2 with the Sonore Signature is the best Streamer/DAC I ever heard. Previously I owned a used Vivaldi Stack (Upsampler v2, Clock, DAC v2). IMO, the DA2 + Sonore has more space/air around instruments and voices. Another highlight are the lows and lower mids... beautiful and unheard before.
  6. Hi @barrows thank you for your answer. Yes, as a long time reader/member of the forum, I know that you work for Sonore. No problem, I don't consider your post as advertising. I really appreciate your input.
  7. No, this does NOT defeat the potential benefit. You used the word "output" for the B side. It's better to consider the EtherREGEN as a moat, which separates what you have downstream (DAC or streamer (e.g. G2/NS1/ultraRendu/opticalRendu) + DAC) from what you have upstream (basically all other devices of your home LAN, including Roon server, NAS, other switches). As long as you only use one port from the A side, it does not matter which side you use to connect the DAC or the streamer which is attached to the DAC. The effect of the moat remains the same. If the streamer has an optical conne
  8. @Albrecht many thanks for your input, really appreciated! Though I have not yet ordered it, for the time being, I think I will go with the Sonore Signature Rendu. These are my reasons: I did own the first microRendu and still own the ultraRendu, my experience with both devices was excellent. The build quality of the G2 could apparently be improved a bit. There's a small German company which offers a modification with an improved power supply. This is in line with your remark about the build quality of the G2. Chris' review of the EMM Labs DAC and his embedded comment
  9. I have a different opinion with regard to the DT 1990 Pro. I had it for several weeks, but the Dan Clark Audio Aeon was clearly better and much more comfortable. Admittedly the Aeon was also a bit more expensive. Therefore I don't believe that the DT 1990 Pro is a giant killer, as it was not even able to "kill" the Aeon. 😉 I guess, searching for a giant killer is just wishful thinking. I have/had the headphones below and the order of sound quality is not exactly spectacular: Stax SR009 (BHSE amp) > Sennheiser HD800S > Aeon 2 (slightly better than) > Aeon > Beyerdynamic 1990
  10. Thank you, firedog. Your thoughts are very welcome and reasonable. I don't expect that I would be able to hear a significant (reproducable) difference with regard to sound quality. Therefore it's indeed more about features, build quality and how it fits into my system. From what I see and read, build quality is on the same level. The Auralic is more versatile, but I am not yet sure about my gut feeling. 🙂
  11. I am torn between adding one of these streamers/transports - Sonore Signature Rendu SE optical - Auralic ARIES G2 I will use the USB input of my emm Labs DA2 V2 DAC. I own already an EtherREGEN with a good power supply. My Roon server (ROCK) has a 4TB SSD which contains the music files. It is connected to the home LAN via Ethernet and a Cisco switch I would use the Sonore like this: Cisco switch -> Ethernet (CAT6a) -> EtherREGEN (B Side) -> EtherREGEN (A Side, optical port) -> Sonore Signature Rendu optical port -> emm Labs DAC (USB input)
  12. I would not use that much attenuation for the DAC. I think you are good, when the following works: - best range for the preamp is when the volume position is between 10 o'clock and 14 o'clock position - attenuation for DAC somewhere betwee 0 dB and -15 dB Of course this depends how the volume adjustment on th DAC is implemented. Nevertheless, the above method is what works best in my experience.
  13. Does it have network streaming and connectivity (ethernet input)? I would really hope, though looking at the front panel, I am afraid it doesn't.
  14. No, that would not be an option. We need the Cisco in our home LAN to connect all the devices (WAPs, network printer, TV, PC, other roon endpoints (microRendu)). Some devices are also in the basement. We use quite a number of in-wall ethernet cabling and the Cisco "sits" in the center of it.
  15. I received the etherREGEN last Friday, waited a few hours to let it adjust to room temperature, inserted it into the system, waited another few hours and then started to listen. I never expected such a significant - immediatly evident improvement. I cannot express better what I heard than what @thotdoc wrote a while ago: "What's different so far is lower noise floor, better harmonics and more data in mid bass, more precise stops and starts of notes and more detail in and surrounding the notes....Space between people more clearly defined...but there seems to be sound in that space, not gr
×
×
  • Create New...