Jump to content

LHCommSquad

  • Content Count

    85
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About LHCommSquad

  • Rank
    Freshman Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 1. What I think has or should have no bearing on what backers decide to do with their time/efforts/resources. 2. Whatever I think about "helping" vs "enabling" I am sure will have no bearing on what others who have a pre-existing disposition feel, so that's a pointless conversation to have. Whatever I decide to do or not do has little to no bearing on LH Lab's continuing operations as the current situation stands. I could disappear tomorrow and LH Labs would continue on doing what LH Labs is doing, except I'm unsure who would be giving you updates on the status of the campaigns or when, regardless of the content contained in those updates, or who would be interacting with customers or when or where those interactions would take place (if any continued to exist). Some day that day may come, sooner or maybe later, and then we'll find out how that works out for all parties (still) involved.
  2. You misunderstand the situation. I'm not in a hole. That information I posted was already public. The information you're discussing is common, public knowledge, easily verified by a search through IGG. There are no "holes". But I suppose this is where the conversation has devolved to: name calling.
  3. Of course I have. In fact, we posted an IGG update on Sep 9, 2017 • 11:36PM regarding the TOS. (see attached photo at the bottom of this post) Larry is aware of the TOS, but when there's no updates to give, there's no updates to give. We could always update everyone by saying there's no update to give, but that would just annoy people as much as actually giving an update does to some people. 1. We give an update. It upsets people because they ONLY want a ship date. 2. We give an update. It upsets people because they assume it's all lies. 3. We give an update. It upsets people because it contains information they don't like. 4. We give an update. Sometimes it pleases some people. OR 1. We give NO update. It upsets people because we aren't updating. We post updates when available, almost or exactly immediately. It's not all the time and it's not every month. I am fully aware of that and Larry is too. (and yes, I know the real-life situation has not worked out according to what the attachment states) If IGG has a problem with LH Labs breaking TOS, they can always take it up with LH Labs and we'll adjust accordingly. On that note, we have at least one member of this forum actively campaigning for IGG to shut down the LH L pages and campaigns; effectively making it impossible for us to send updates to anyone...so updates may indeed become a thing of the past if this individual gets his way. TOS won't apply at that point. On that note, a Wave update is coming soon (hopefully by this weekend) and when I get more information over other campaigns, those will be posted as well.
  4. Thank you, you too. I appreciate the thoughtful letter and while I have thoughts on it, I will not discuss them here. Thanks again.
  5. Post your questions you'd like to see answered in a Q&A session. Keep in mind: Any questions you submit may or may not be edited (or included) for brevity, clarity, and for civility.
  6. 1. I didn't badmouth SBAF due to "you believing that consumers should be informed and, as a community, we need to continue to explore what we hear and why?" I was a member of SBAF loooooong before I was EVER associated with LH Labs. Your reason as to my reason is wrong (and I previously stated it here and it was ignored by you) 2. I was never an asshole to anyone over there, and there were 3 contradicting reasons given to 2 different people as to why my accounts were banned. I could go in-depth but it's really not worth it. In fact, the guy who "kick-started" my ban actually APOLOGIZED to me over it and regretted it getting that far. This is the second time you've personally attacked me out of nowhere in public. At no point have I ever publicly trashed you personally. 3. SBAF is known as a joke, a hive-mind, and a cult, and a Campfire Audio shill place amongst the high-end audiophiles I personally know. The forum is discussed quite a bit in depth in our inner circles. (note: this is not to say CA is bad at all, CA is generally highly regarded by myself and others) There is virtually zero moderation, members are allowed to openly attack other members, and calls to violence are ignored, amongst many many other problems in the discussions. You try to be an audiophile 4 Chan, except you're not as clever. [you're welcome to use that as your tagline] Your close friends are bad company, as is your community. I honestly used to like SBAF a LOT more than Head-Fi until I actually REALLY began to understand the culture at SBAF (after LH Labs). 4. The irony is: if I hadn't been banned, I would have contacted the member who drove (to the wrong address) BEFORE he had driven and given him the RIGHT address so he didn't waste a trip (because I honestly didn't care if he drove out to the new office, as I stated here). Unfortunately, no one bothered to check the address until AFTER the mistake. 5. Anything else you posted about LH Labs I won't deny, as you would know better than I would, and we all appreciate you letting us know the story. I certainly hold no ill will towards you sharing your LH Labs experience and I've heard similar stories from other employees. 6. Anything else I have to say I'll PM it, unless you decide to drag out personal things into the public again.
  7. I only asked Lee because someone brought it up on this forum that a) he wrote the original article on LH and the article ended up being almost completely wrong and b) he was a member of CA/AS and c) he chimed in on this thread. I am barely aware of Lee, only being familiar with him on an extreme very surface level from his various writings, (mostly that LH Labs article). And I can assure you that Lee and Larry are almost certainly 99.99999% not having some sort of backdoor communication, especially since Lee hasn't responded to my offer and Larry was surprised by the name drop after not hearing it for years. Nor do I have any idea how he would handle that interview. However, if anyone has alternate suggestions for an interviewer who has in-depth knowledge of LH Labs/IGG/crowdfunding/LH Labs + IGG debacle, let me know.
  8. Of course. The SBAF community did absolutely NO researching into literally anything revolving around the current address (much like other things they choose not to research when it comes to LH Labs or Light Harmonic). Instead, they focused on name-calling and conspiracy theories. They specifically chose and discussed the old address (Roseville), absolutely no one bothered to check or correct the address, even people on this forum who frequent that forum, and we had even DISCUSSED on this very thread the exact new address. You yourself even posted that exact address and I told everyone to go over there and check. The new address was ALSO posted on Facebook and ALSO directly on our website.
  9. Larry tentatively agreed to the interview. I haven't heard back from Lee, which is why I didn't post an update yet. No, we honestly had no such discussion about the backers going away. I went away over the weekend though. BTW, thanks to those of you from CA who have privately penned me very nice, open dialogue notes regarding the LH Labs situation. You are very much appreciated.
  10. I asked Lee if he would be willing to moderate the Q&A Discussion with Larry, assuming it gets approved. If Lee responds and agrees, we'll hammer out the next steps and announce that. Barring that....we hopefully will be able to figure something else out.
  11. And that's how you shut down a conversation, everyone.
  12. Could also mean he doesn't want to put himself out there where everyone would just call him a liar regardless. Maybe both. It's easy to speculate both ways with zero proof of intentions either way. If i hear something, I'll announce it.
  13. I'm dying. Extremely accurate. Absolutely no offense to Chris, but he's kind of shown himself to be not 100% neutral on the matter. On top of that, I don't think it would ever happen regardless of whether it was Chris or not, but I'll pass that idea along. I personally think it's great. I've been pushing for more Q&As myself actually, either live or via updates.
×
×
  • Create New...