Jump to content

motberg

Members
  • Content Count

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by motberg

  1. I had a situation with HQPlayer vol. control, where I tried upsampling at a rate that was incompatible with my DDC, resulting in full vol. static. So I think even if the software vol. control is stable (HQPlayer works great) ..... with digital signals, and various hardware and software being involved, maybe potential incompatibilities should be also considered.
  2. I am also using the MiniDSP for subs... subs only, monitors running full range... the miniDSP 2x4 HD version was an audible upgrade from the prior model in my system.
  3. What do you guys think about adding sub-woofers in a DAC direct to amp system? Is it OK to split a 2V RCA output and run a set of cables 1 meter to the amp, and another set to the subs maybe 4 meters each? I get the feeling that most DAC makers generally are expecting the user to use a single set of outputs to a single receiving device.
  4. I am pretty sure Ghent can make that for you.... just send him an email... http://www.ghentaudio.com/pc/hg01.html
  5. I know this is a stretch... but has anyone compared a Schiit Freya S to software volume control ?
  6. But I think to use software volume control, you need modify the source file digitally. So isn't the choice digital manipulation of the source vs. analog manipulation of the DAC output?
  7. I just ran AO on the HQPlayer Win2019 GUI NAA machine... Wow.... I was shocked how good this software volume control is using HQPlayer. I have tried other softwares years ago and recently the built in volume control on a Topping D70 and a Gustard A20H without major success (the Gustard was pretty good though). I have not run through all my normal test tracks yet, but my preliminary observations indicate the HQPlayer vol. control has no major audible drawbacks in my system. Thanks to everyone who helped get me this far.... much appreciated....
  8. Thanks, can you please advise a couple software volume control options that you consider well implemented.
  9. I have not seen any valid study done where the THD was reported detected at less than .5%. That is why I was asking, since you seem to be sure 0.25% is audible. In any case, it certainly is not the bottleneck in my system. And now that I got HQPlayer setup direct out, I am more convinced that the Lightspeed is more representative of the direct signal than any other preamp I have heard in my system.
  10. Any scientific back up to the claim 0.25% THD as tested in your example is detectable by average humans?
  11. I already saw them... I am sure was well below audibility... remember some decimal points and zeros, etc...
  12. The maker has posted also his distortion calculations and seems really low to me.... Not sure if the PS has any effect, but mine is powered by mains regenerator into LPS into 4 x LT3045 regulator The Lightspeed has been on Stereophile Recommended Components list and gets great comparative reviews. It certainly subjectively was much clearer to me than my Schiit Saga + in passive mode. (already sold the Saga +)
  13. Here is real world configuration: Using @ericuco suggestion (thanks!) I set max vol to -10 db my normal volume level will be a couple db less than max. So - at 44.1/16 -> 176.4 K, HQPlayer vol set at -12db, what am I losing in terms of dynamic range? Are there any settings available to optimize this (such as increasing bit depth) ?
  14. with a good passive pre in my system (Lightspeed LDR), I am guessing I usually use less than 25% attenuation Speakers are very inefficient, DAC is 4 x PCM1704UK per channel, possible to 768KHz I do not think I would damage anything if the DAC full level hit the amp my question is, when using HQPlayer, how to adjust the settings to arrive at the most optimal "bit saturation".
  15. OK! I am testing this with my NOS DAC, HQPlayer 3, dual PC, just got a Windows NAA working on Server 2019 GUI and it is sounding great so far.. For HQPlayer, how is best to manage the "gain staging" of the digital volume control? I am upsampling to 384, within the rate family, and have Min Vol set at -60 and Max Vol set at -3.. would this be optimal ?
  16. Is it required to oversample the file (say Redbook 16/44) to get the best performance for using a digital software volume control, using HQPlayer for example ?
  17. Hi, The AK4497 DAC's I had were the Topping D70 (OK but no dynamics) and the Gustard A20H (AOK). They were fed by a pretty decent dual PC setup, both fanless, using full ATX LPS's and all peripherals (PCIE cards, SSD's, etc) fed by separate LPS's, most with outboard LT3045 regulators. USB output is from a JCat USB* card to a Singxer UIP-1* isolator to a WFS Recovery* reclocker (*these all powered by separate Uptone LPS-1/1.2 super-capacitor PS and followed by LT3045's). Software is WIN10 on control PC and WINServer 2019 GUI on the audio PC, using JPlay and AO. Preamps and DAC's are powered by 220V mains power regeneration units. Preamps used for comparisons were Lightspeed LDR attenuator (dead neutral) or Audio-GD Master 1, C-2, or NFB-1AMP (all SS and generally neutral). AMP is Audio-GD Master 3 (Neutral-warm SS) Speakers are Mark Daniel Ruby monitors (pretty flat but a couple +5db peaks after 10K in-room measured) http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/markdaniel3/ruby.html All cables good quality but nothing crazy; interconnects are pure silver litz or Morrow, USB are Paul Pang, HDMI i2s is Wireworld, power cables are generic audiophile style, DC cables by Ghent, lots of MuMetal shielding scattered about. Small, dedicated, single chair, amateur-acoustically treated, lights-out listening room. My impression was that the AK4497 has very natural tonality, good sound-stage, and very black background (especially the D70). These were both generally bettered by my Audio-GD NOS 7 (PCM1704UK, 4 per channel), which has similar attributes but adds a more realistic weight or texture (much more expensive also..). Both these AK4497 DAC's's had some problems with occasional pops when trying DSD. I tried the USB inputs - and also a Gustard U16 DDC i2s for the Gustard A20H. For the Topping D70 I had trouble using i2s DDC's - neither the Gustard U16 or Singxer SU-1 would work via i2s. But I did not really try to much to troubleshoot this DSD problem. I asked my Gustard supplier about this popping and they replied it was inherent in the AK4497, but that answer was probably just weak customer service and not accurate. So if you are looking to use a lot of DSD files, you may want to double check that popping stuff with the AK's.. I only have a few DSD albums, but also had trouble with HQPlayer oversampling to DSD. (I have a Topping D50 and a quick check showed my DSD files works OK with the Sabre Topping) This problem was probably due to my configurations, but it would be a good point to investigate on the exact DAC you are considering, if you will be using DSD or changing sample rates within a playlist.
  18. I have recently tried 2 Dual AK4497 DAC's from different makers. One was pretty good overall, and the other obviously lacked dynamics. So I think the implementation of the chip in the DAC as a whole will have a greater influence than the chip itself. I think it is a good idea to have both tube and solid state options at home! But maybe the MP DAC alone, especially with the 4497 and all the tweaking options available will offer a big enough dose of the tube good stuff (I would check that first before getting a tube pre and amp). I would think tube rolling will offer much bigger differences than AK vs. Sabre. You may be surprised at the extra sound quality you can gain through a dedicated source such as: I have not heard an AK4493, but if you like the reviews of that Topping model, I have read the chips share the same general family sound signature. I notice the DX3 Pro uses a 15V power supply, which seems to me a somewhat uncommon voltage. Only you can decide if the extra expense of a fancy power supply is worth the sound quality difference to you. I think most DAC engineers put a high value in the power supply design. The Topping D50 (Sabre) gets some good reviews and uses 5V, which should give you more power supply options. For travel I would use an iFi (these seems to be being upgraded so check carefully). https://www.musicdirect.com/recommended-gifts-under-50/ifi-ipower-outboard-supply https://ifi-audio.com/products/ipowerx/ 5V also can try a USB battery power pack source which may give a different presentation and may be great for travel (would need check the amperage draw, but maybe no so bad with the display shut down). For home, there are many 5V options including the used market. The iFi is also available in 15V for the Topping DX3 Pro, which may prove a very nice combination for the money.
  19. Yep - he was using a small server MB, not sure the model but it was one of the small Supermicro server boards.... I am using a dual PC setup now, but have enough extra stuff to build up a nice single box for Euphony trial, so am following this closely ... and of course thanks a million for all your posts from the other thread...
  20. I have setup 2 i5's similarly, and used a 10A on the HDPlex 400 DC-DC just for the 24 pin and then another 12V 10A direct to the EATX. My current i7 control PC uses a HDPlex 400W ATX LPS just for the 24 pin... another 10A direct to the 12V EATX. Everything runs super cool... all peripherals and SSD's, cards, etc. use separate LPS's A friend's research (using a bunch of MPAudio LT3045's and other regulators ) concluded that in his build the 5V was most important to the sound quality, so that may be a good indicator to consider to keep as much headroom there (on the 24 pin) as possible. just looking at Ghent's prices as a base reference... I guess the fis stuff is going to be somewhat expensive 😁
  21. I have read that you need be careful with software vol. control so as to not accidentally have it default to 100% I have only tried it once so not much experience....
  22. I never compared them side-by-side but the Intona and Singxer both are beneficial to my setup as the system exhibits a noticeable downgrade when they are removed from the chain. I also like to follow the Singxer with the Wyred 4 Sound Recovery (with isolated PS) to get better reclocking. The Uptone does the high-level reclocking internally also, but the isolation may not work and returning it from Europe would possibly not be convenient.
  23. I have had the Uptone ISORegen, an Industrial Intona (first version), and the Singxer UIP-1 . https://shenzhenaudio.com/products/singxer-uip-1-isolate-processor-usb2-0-usb-interface?_pos=1&_sid=6fb180caf&_ss=r The Uptone did not work in my system and there were pretty many reports that some users could not get the isolation to work. The Intona and Singxer works perfectly in my system, both are in use today. If I was buying today, I would probably go for the new Intona. Ifi also has an isolator. https://ifi-audio.com/products/nano-igalvanic3-0/
×
×
  • Create New...