-
Content Count
368 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About JR_Audio
-
Rank
Sophomore Member
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Hi Mitch. Ah, great you are introducing a new (at least for me new) room correction solution. I will read through it and will give it a spin. If you have a regular room, you can do so much with room correction to get good sound, much more than with most of the “tweaks” that are used to improve the sound. Thanks for writing.
-
Article: Making Memories In Santa Monica
JR_Audio replied to The Computer Audiophile's topic in Article Comments
Hi Chris, Hi Maier. Great to read that you both have had a wonderful time together, listening to music and enjoy live. All the best from my side. Juergen -
Article: CAPS Twenty | Part One
JR_Audio replied to The Computer Audiophile's topic in Article Comments
Hi Chris. Wow, this is a great project. Congrats! Juergen -
Article: Home Audio Fidelity - Room Shaper Review
JR_Audio replied to mitchco's topic in Article Comments
Hi Mitch. Great Report. Thanks. One question, as this seems to work “dynamically”: If you would make some steady state frequency response measurements with different levels, will you then be able to see changes / correction in the resulting frequency response? Juergen -
Article: CA is now Audiophile Style!
JR_Audio replied to The Computer Audiophile's topic in Article Comments
Happy New Year Chris and a great idea with going into the audiophile style 😉 -
Article: A New Listening Room Part One
JR_Audio replied to The Computer Audiophile's topic in Article Comments
Hi Chris. Oh man. A lot of work. Good luck. Juergen -
This could have 4 different reasons: Microphone, Mic Pre-Amp, Tape Head or Venue Noise This could be the SMPS noise of the polarization voltage that could go into the signal for 2 reasons: Either the signal transformer / path is not fully balanced, so that the SMPS noise is not canceled out, that would otherwise be the case with balanced signal path (if the in-phase path has for example 1k1 and the off-phase path 1k0 input resistance), or what I have had with older Neumann Tube of FET mics is, that the filtering electrolyte got a cold solder point. It is always good to
-
Article: Kevin Schmidt: We Are the Robots Exhibit Review
JR_Audio replied to mitchco's topic in Article Comments
Hi Mitch, Hi Archie. Very nice. I would have liked to join you for this event. It would have been fun, for sure. Thanks. Juergen -
Article: Dutch & Dutch 8c Loudspeaker Review
JR_Audio replied to mitchco's topic in Article Comments
For my Genelecs 8260 in my Mixing / Mastering Room, that are coaxial from low mid on, so very good sound stage and localization for near / mid field mixing and mastering, but not time coherent, I have the miniDSP Dirac DDRC-22D (Digital-In to Digital-Out) and use this for Room EQ (that could the Genelec GLM also) and also to make them time coherent, and use the digital volume control of the miniDSP to control the SPL. Yes, I know, the miniDSP does run internally with 96 kHz sample rate, and does SRC all other sample rates, but being time coherent up the 48 kHz (96 kHz / 2) is of much higher of -
Article: Dutch & Dutch 8c Loudspeaker Review
JR_Audio replied to mitchco's topic in Article Comments
Hi Mitch. Wow, another great review from you. Congrats on that. I enjoyed every paragraph you have written. I am familiar with both speakers (Dutch & Dutch 8c and Kii THREE) and do agree with many points you have described. But for most, it is great to see such thorough review of speakers with the focus, how they behave at home, and not mainly in anechoic chambers. Juergen -
Article: NAD VISO HP50 with Roomfeel Headphone Review
JR_Audio replied to mitchco's topic in Article Comments
Hi Mitch. What a great work and write-up. My full respect for this level of clean analysis and writing. This is extraordinary. Thanks. Juergen -
Article: Computer Audiophile Turns 10 Today!
JR_Audio replied to The Computer Audiophile's topic in Article Comments
Congratulations Chris, also from my side. Great. My best wishes for you for the upcoming future. -
Article: My First 24 Hours With MQA
JR_Audio replied to The Computer Audiophile's topic in Article Comments
Hi Pal Good, that you join this group. My two points, are not adressed against you in any way but: MQA is lossy, where plain PCM would not, and concerning the sound quality of actual releases. If I would remove every actual release, that do have inter sample overload or native overloads (leaving aside the much to heavy dynamic compression), then nearly no pop / rock release would remain. Juergen