DIRAC Live vs. Audiolense: Smaller Learning Curve and Gain Loss?

[nxrm]

I may be able to use this interface to build a 5.3  system (three powered subs). https://motu.com/products/avb/8a

I would certainly enjoy it for music listening, and which may be greatly enhanced via this software.

But just as often I'd want to use the system for playing 1080p BD movie disks via JRiver. https://jriver.com/ 

 

The plan is for JRiver to output the video from my graphic's card's HDMI port to my TV while it decodes the BD movie's DTS-MA

to a 5.1 (or 5.3?) PCM signal and sending it via USB to the MOTU 8A.

 

Regarding the analog outputs, https://motu.com/products/avb/8a/specs.html it appears that each of the eight balanced outputs

deliver 20 dbu max output/channel, or ~ 7.8 volts, as per this chart. https://www.sowter.co.uk/decibels.php

 

So, given that (undistorted) output level range, and depending on speaker sensitivity, amplifier input sensitivity/gain, room size

and volume levels which of these two software based room correction solution usually might imposed the lesser amount of signal loss?  https://www.dirac.com/live/