Jump to content
IGNORED

Digital streaming optimisation with EtherRegen - ENO filter Vs Master clock Vs sonore optical module


Recommended Posts

hi all,

 

after some advice/views am looking to further optimise my hifi etherregen digital network setup 

 

currently is router with LPS> 8m AQ cinnamon Ethernet > ERegen with MCRU pinnicle LPS > Chord Super Sarum Ethernet > innuous zenith mk 3 > innuos pheonix (chord USB cables) > CHORD DAVE DAC 

router also feeds > switch > Wifi Mesh system aswell with loads of other stuff hanging off it with SMPS, etc 

 

having spent a LOT of time reading, thoughts were 1 of the following (maybe more than one over time) but not sure how would best work with the ERegen in my system 

 

1) add an afterdark master clock an LPS to the ERegen

2) Use a Sonore opticalModule with LPS to connect via fibre to my ERegen (to isolate system fully from rest of my home network)

3) use the ENO Ag network filter with my ERegen 

 

any advice or feedback from those that have tried combos with the ERegen greatly appreciated 

 

 

thanks

 

Mat 

Link to comment
28 minutes ago, plissken said:

 

Whom ever told you to add an external clock to a switch typically won't understand how data networks operate.

 

All your play back is from data at rest and needs only the clock on your DAC to reconstruct the samples with the proper timing.

Just so I’m clear you’re saying the only clock that matters is the DAC’s clock? All other clocks are irrelevant? 

Link to comment

the pheonix usb reclocker made a real +ve difference to sound quality as did adding the etherregen switch which also has a reclocker (ER notable when streaming from quobuz) 

 

was after any peeps experience with the products when used with the etherregen switch or any other tips welcomed :) 

 

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, mbj666 said:

the pheonix usb reclocker made a real +ve difference to sound quality as did adding the etherregen switch which also has a reclocker (ER notable when streaming from quobuz) 

 

was after any peeps experience with the products when used with the etherregen switch or any other tips welcomed :) 

 

If you are going purely by SQ then try each option and select. There is no measurement based way, nor theory, to select among these options. Every ethernet switch reclocks. No one can tell you what you hear.

 

The option which would make the most sense to me would be the opticalModule but the etherregen claims to block leakage currents aka common mode noise so unsure why it would help. You might be good to go already.

Custom room treatments for headphone users.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, ASRMichael said:

Just so I’m clear you’re saying the only clock that matters is the DAC’s clock? All other clocks are irrelevant? 

I think that the Etherregen claims to have an excellent internal clock. My suspicion is that any external clock, regardless of how good, could improve on an excellent internal clock. But I just know what I'm told, I haven't seen anything like eye patterns. Clocks and ethernet signals aren't magic, they have defined measurable properties. Its a network device not a DAC nor amplifier.

Custom room treatments for headphone users.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, ASRMichael said:

Just so I’m clear you’re saying the only clock that matters is the DAC’s clock? All other clocks are irrelevant? 

 

I'm saying an external clock on an Ethernet switch doesn't matter and whomever is saying it does doesn't understand how data networks operate when it comes to non-realtime playback.

 

Now there are switches with IEEE 1588 V1 and V2 PTP. But that is an entirely other beast and not meant for simple re-play systems.

Link to comment
11 hours ago, mbj666 said:

any advice or feedback from those that have tried combos with the ERegen greatly appreciated 

You have got advice from the only 2 persons here at AS that deny the benefit of EtherRegen with or without an external clock. Uptone soon will have 3000 happy EtherRegen owners. 
 

Option 1 is what I would do. 
A second EtherRegen instead of the opticalModule maybe as a possible option. (30 days money back). 
And remember to purchase the 50 ohm version. (And send the 75ohm back 😉). 

Link to comment
9 hours ago, R1200CL said:

You have got advice from the only 2 persons here at AS that deny the benefit of EtherRegen with or without an external clock.

 

I deny it based on real world testing. Try to refute my video example. You tell everyone here how the eR affected the SQ even though we don't need it connected while playing back. By disconnecting the eR I've purposefully introduced the largest source of jitter possible. What possible effect can the eR or any switch, external clocking applied or not, have on the data once it's delivered.

 

With all due respect R1200CL you don't know what you are talking about.

 

 

Link to comment
22 hours ago, mbj666 said:

currently is router with LPS> 8m AQ cinnamon Ethernet > ERegen with MCRU pinnicle LPS > Chord Super Sarum Ethernet > innuous zenith mk 3 > innuos pheonix (chord USB cables) > CHORD DAVE DAC 

router also feeds > switch > Wifi Mesh system aswell with loads of other stuff hanging off it with SMPS, etc

 

19 hours ago, mbj666 said:

the pheonix usb reclocker made a real +ve difference to sound quality as did adding the etherregen switch which also has a reclocker (ER notable when streaming from quobuz) 

 

Definitely all the realtime audio is generated by Innuous Zenith Mk 3 and is output via USB cable to the Pheonix USB reclocker in that setup. Absolutely no realtime audio comes from Qobuz's online server, which only provides the Zenith with bog standard FLAC audio archive file tracks over the network.

 

The ER would be as notable with Qobuz's FLAC files as it would be with your online bank statement files. 

We are far more united and have far more in common with each other than things that divide us.

-- Jo Cox

Link to comment

@plissken

The way you use EtherRegen, there probably isn’t any benefit. We have discussed this before in a couple of treads. You do not stream your music the way most other people do. When I pull my cable, music stops. See also here:

For the rest of us, John’s innovative developments, has help several in achieving better SQ in the digital chain for a price point most can afford. 
 

 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, plissken said:

 

I deny it based on real world testing. Try to refute my video example. You tell everyone here how the eR affected the SQ even though we don't need it connected while playing back. By disconnecting the eR I've purposefully introduced the largest source of jitter possible. What possible effect can the eR or any switch, external clocking applied or not, have on the data once it's delivered.

 

With all due respect R1200CL you don't know what you are talking about.

 

 

I’ll give you 1 million dollars if you come to my house & listen to an EtherRegen. Money is waiting! 😂

Link to comment

will take a look at the other bits of info posted thanks 

 

all i can say is what i hear and ER with LPS definitely improved SQ when streaming quobuz via internet and off local innuous drive directly which is where my thoughts on the ENO / sonore optical isolation come from as attributed this latter part down the the ER moat design (also noticed that adding an LPS to my router helped also, which was test of noise still getting through)

 

reclocker wise the pheonix gave another jump in performance again much more pronounced than the ER though 

 

anyone tried the ENO network filter? 

Link to comment
49 minutes ago, R1200CL said:

See also here:

For the rest of us, John’s innovative developments, has help several in achieving better SQ in the digital chain for a price point most can afford. 
 

 

 

I've seen the thread. Again you don't understand what you are even talking about and that thread proves it. Miska, John, Jabbr, Paul, have all tried in that thread to INFORM you.

 

Stupidity is ignorance left willfully uncorrected.

 

Also: If you have a play back setup that has buffering in the millisecond range than you have a sub-optimal setup. I like products that are able to take advantage of the best technology has to offer: Multi-rate GBe (1 / 2.5 / 5 / 10), wireless, optical, copious amounts of RAM for buffer (Tidal, JRiver, some others I'm sure) that will take advantage of the fact I can put 300+MB/s on the wire and then be done with it.

 

What again are John's innovations? A really slow, really hot, really expensive, switch.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, ASRMichael said:

Do you have evidence to the contrary? 3000 happy users versus your opinion. The 3000 have at least tried it. You haven’t. Let’s leave it at that. 
 

Worth a laugh mind you! 

 

I just posted a video of playback happening w/o the eR or Aruba switch even plugged in. That's no opinion. It's proof.

 

Did the sound get better, worse, or stay the same when I plugged/unplugged the eR?

 

Did the sound get better, worse, or stay the same when I plugged/unplugged the Aruba?

 

I know about 3000 people that don't believe in the Covid Vaccine either. Lets leave it at that. I don't give a fig what 3000 Luddites think. 

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
On 8/23/2021 at 11:50 AM, mbj666 said:

..having spent a LOT of time reading, thoughts were 1 of the following (maybe more than one over time) but not sure how would best work with the ERegen in my system 

 

1) add an afterdark master clock an LPS to the ERegen

2) Use a Sonore opticalModule with LPS to connect via fibre to my ERegen (to isolate system fully from rest of my home network)

3) use the ENO Ag network filter with my ERegen

Back to the question at hand: for me,

#1  hasn't happened, so no opinion

#2 didn't hear much sonic synergy, but I left a fiber link in place anyway to the audio-only network segment

#3 ENO Ag system alone outperformed ERegen, so I choose to leave ENO last device into my best Roon endpoint while still using the Uptone ahead of a Cisco 2960 switch serving both that and also the second best endpoint for another system. Unlike some others, I do NOT hear any compromise using them together.

Link to comment
32 minutes ago, Meridimac said:

Back to the question at hand: for me,

#1  hasn't happened, so no opinion

#2 didn't hear much sonic synergy, but I left a fiber link in place anyway to the audio-only network segment

#3 ENO Ag system alone outperformed ERegen, so I choose to leave ENO last device into my best Roon endpoint while still using the Uptone ahead of a Cisco 2960 switch serving both that and also the second best endpoint for another system. Unlike some others, I do NOT hear any compromise using them together.

thx appreciate your insight :) 

Link to comment

Some other points I would like to clarify:

 

1) I am using the Fiber/EtherRegen/SOtM SNH-10G/ENO in cascade, one after the other, in that order.

2) In my system, EtherRegen -> SOtM sound better than the other way around.  More full bodied.

3) ETherRegen + Eno = Not so good.  But put the SOtM switch in the middle and everything improves.  Now the ENO at the end of the chain has a smaller effect, but still positive enough for me to want to keep it. There is a better synergy (in my system) between the SOtM and the ENO.

4) Others prefer the sound of one or two SOtM in cascade.

5) Others have reported that a different order of devices gave them better results, which leads me to believe each individual should test their own system and decide.

6) Monomode fiber sounds better than multimode.  There is a theory about the reflections inside the fiber that explains this.

________________________________________________________________________________

Finisar Mono mode Fiber > (Finisar SFPs + iFi Elite) > SOtM SNh 10g (+AD Clock + LPSU) > Melco S10 > Melco N10 > Verity Audio Monsalvat Pre 2 > MBL N15 Monoblocks > MBL 116 speakers

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...