Miska Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 17 hours ago, PeterSt said: PS: But watch out for the 16/44.1 MQA's these days. They are a whole different bunch with their own anomalies and pestering and faking and taking (Tidal) out the original albums and what not. So yeh, yuk. There's also lot of originally 44.1/24 or 48/24 material that is available as MQA. For example through Tidal. Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
Popular Post Miska Posted April 16, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted April 16, 2021 On 4/15/2021 at 2:42 AM, GoldenOne said: In a 2018 RMAF talk by Chris Connaker, MQA handwaved away evidence collected by Archimago that their filter design was leaky, by implying he was involved in the industry and was biased. And that because Chris wouldn't reveal Archimago's real name, the information couldn't be trusted. You can now just download the filter coefficients and see yourself their responses. mansr who extracted those also posted the response plots here at one point. Then, there's the generic upsampling filter used also for non-MQA content in many DACs, for which you can find performance here, in Fig.6: https://www.stereophile.com/content/mytek-hifi-brooklyn-da-processorheadphone-amplifier-measurements Edit: looks like the link doesn't work correctly, so here's just the relevant plot linked: Elberoth and GoldenOne 1 1 Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now